Development of Lake Tahoe Final Recommendation Sample Clauses

Development of Lake Tahoe Final Recommendation. The LTFAC will request that administrative staff with the Forest Service (see below) prepare the Final Recommendation for Lake Tahoe for its review based on the Preliminary Recommendation, minutes of the public hearing, and input from the congressional delegation. The LTFAC role is to incorporate the input that is received regarding the nominated projects along with its own views, and to reconcile the nominated projects with the available funding. The LTFAC will also be responsible for assuring that the projects included in the Lake Tahoe Restoration Projects Recommendation maximize the use of all available funding prior to recommending SNPLMA funds being used. For example, the acquisition of environmentally sensitive land should come, first, from other sources, such as Section 4 of SNPLMA, Xxxxxxx- Xxxxxx, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund, whenever possible. The Final Recommendation shall specify a certain total funding amount derived from a per project basis for the Lake Tahoe projects included in the Primary Category. The Final Recommendation shall allow for the flexibility to replace projects from the Secondary to Primary Category for Lake Tahoe Restoration Projects based on available funding approved by the Secretary, subject to the following guidelines. All projects that are funded shall come first from the Primary Category and then, if funds are available, to projects in the Secondary Category. A project from the Secondary Category may be funded only if a project from the Primary Category becomes infeasible or if actual costs of such a project are lower than estimated costs, and if the TWG determines that all other projects in the Primary Category are adequately funded. The TWG shall prioritize projects in the Secondary Category so that, if funds are available for such projects, the project with the highest priority for the amount of funding that becomes available shall be implemented. Conversely, if the Secretary approves funding that is less than the total amount of the Primary Category, the TWG will determine which project(s) shall be moved from the Primary Category to the Secondary Category. The anticipated amount for funding recommendations from the SNPLMA Special Account for the Lake Tahoe Restoration Projects is expected to be approximately $37.5 million annually until the amount allocated in accordance with section 342 of P.L. 108-108 is expended. In allocating each round of funding among Federal agencies for Lake Tahoe, if available...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Development of Lake Tahoe Final Recommendation

  • Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.

  • Development Reports Beginning six months after Effective Date and ending on the date of first commercial sale of a Licensed Product in the United States, LICENSEE shall report to Cornell progress covering LICENSEE's (and Affiliate's and Sublicensee's) activities and efforts in the development of rights granted to LICENSEE under this Agreement for the preceding six months. The report shall include, but not be limited to, activities and efforts to develop and test all Licensed Products and obtain governmental approvals necessary for marketing the same. Such semi-annual reports shall be due within sixty days (60) of the reporting period and shall use the form as provided herein as Appendix C.

  • Implementation of Corrective Action Plan After the Corrective Action Plan is finalized, the Purchasers shall use reasonable best efforts to implement the finalized Corrective Action Plan on the timeline set forth therein and provide periodic reports (as provided for therein) to the Sellers on the status of their implementation of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • Contract Negotiation Meetings When operational requirements permit, the Employer will grant leave without pay to an employee for the purpose of attending contract negotiation meetings on behalf of the Alliance. Preparatory Contract Negotiation Meetings

  • Construction Change Directives 1.1.1, 3.4.2, 3.11, 3.12.8, 4.2.8, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.1.3, 7.3, 9.3.1.1 Construction Schedules, Contractor’s 3.10, 3.11, 3.12.1, 3.12.2, 6.1.3, 15.1.6.2

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

  • Contract Negotiations Meetings Where operational requirements permit, the Employer will grant leave without pay to an employee for the purpose of attending contract negotiations meetings on behalf of the Institute.

  • Approval of Plans and Specifications The Plans and Specifications will conform to the requirements and conditions set out by applicable law or any effective restrictive covenant, and to all governmental authorities which exercise jurisdiction over the Leased Premises or the construction thereon.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!