RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Sample Clauses

RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. The Recommendation Development Process explains the steps involved in assembling a recommendation for final approval as to how the revenue in the Special Accounts would be spent. This process includes the organizational entities described in Section III and provides opportunities for Federal, tribal government, State and local government to participate. Figure 1 depicts the process and anticipated annual time-line. Each step in the process is then described in more detail.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. The Recommendation Development Process explains the steps involved in assembling a recommendation for the Secretaries as to how the revenue in the Special Accounts would be spent with approval. This process includes the organizational entities described in Section III and provides several opportunities for any Federal, State or local governmental entities or other interested parties to participate. Figure 1 depicts the SNPLMA process and typical annual time- line. Each step in the process is then described in more detail. The actual time line will vary because Secretarial approval is required on the previous round of nominations before beginning a new round. The Lake Tahoe Recommendation Process is separate but parallel to the SNPLMA process and is depicted in Figure 1-A below. FIGURE 1-A: Lake Tahoe Recommendation Development Process
Sample 1
RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. The Working Group will work together to provide recommendations to Boulder County on how to distribute the Fund. The Working Group is not a final decision-making body; ultimately, the final decision on the distribution of funding lies with the Boulder County Commissioners. The commissioners are eager to hear feedback and receive guidance from the community and will carefully review the recommendations provided by the Working Group. The Working Group will seek to achieve "consensus" in the development of recommendations. For this process, the term consensus is defined as "all members of the panel can live with the proposal." Consensus requires that all members act in good faith and actively propose viable alternative solutions to meet the interests of other partners and find common ground. If the Working Group cannot achieve consensus on a given recommendation, any differing perspectives will be shared in a final report to the Boulder County Commissioners. The Boulder County Commissioners will review all perspectives provided in a final report and make decisions accordingly. WORKING GROUP MEMBER EXPECTATIONS The Working Group will consist of representatives from the following communities*: • Chute Rd./Juniper Heights • Coal Creek Canyon Dr./SH 72 & South of SH 72 (e.g., Crescent Lake Rd., Copperdale Ln., Hummingbird Ln., etc.) • Gross Dam Rd • Lakeshore/North Shore • Lazy Z/Xxxxxx Rd. (west side) • Miramonte • Pika/Flagstaff • SH 72 & GDR intersection • Tunnel Rd. 19/Lichen Ln. • Other – (TBD) *Boulder County reserves the right to appoint more than one representative from the larger communities and to combine other areas as necessary. Working Group members are requested to consider the construction impacts to the community as a whole rather than focusing specifically on their own individual circumstances. Members are asked to be cognizant that the goal of the group is to provide guidance to the Boulder County Commissioners on what the community feels is most fair. The Working Group will meet three times to develop recommendations. There will also be a community meeting open to the public in April. It is mandatory for Working Group members to attend all Working Group meetings; it is optional but strongly encouraged that Working Group members attend the community meeting. The schedule for the Working Group meetings is as follows: • Thursday, April 6, from 5:30 pm to 8:30 pm (mandatory in-person Working Group meeting – CCCIA or City of Boulder location TBD) • ...
Sample 1

Related to RECOMMENDATION DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

  • Design Development Phase Services 3.3.1 Based on the Owner’s approval of the Schematic Design Documents, and on the Owner’s authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect shall prepare Design Development Documents for the Owner’s approval. The Design Development Documents shall illustrate and describe the development of the approved Schematic Design Documents and shall consist of drawings and other documents including plans, sections, elevations, typical construction details, and diagrammatic layouts of building systems to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems, and other appropriate elements. The Design Development Documents shall also include outline specifications that identify major materials and systems and establish, in general, their quality levels.

  • Professional Development Program (a) The parties agree to continue a Professional Development Program for the maintenance and development of the faculty members' professional competence and effectiveness. It is agreed that maintenance of currency of subject knowledge, the improvement of performance of faculty duties, and the maintenance and improvement of professional competence, including instructional skills, are the primary professional development activities of faculty members.

  • Professional Development Plan Professional Development Plan (PDP) refers to plans developed by faculty members addressing the criteria contained in Article 22 and Appendix G.

  • Professional Development Committee There shall be a Professional Development Committee composed of at least two (2) representatives of the Association and an equal number of representatives from the Hospital. Each party may have alternates to replace a member from time to time.

  • Local Professional Development Committee 1. The Local Professional Development Committee (LPDC) shall be established to oversee and review professional development plans pursuant to ORC 3319.22.

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Design Development An interim step in the design process. Design Development documents consist of plans, elevations, and other drawings and outline specifications. These documents will fix and illustrate the size and character of the entire project in its essentials as to kinds of materials, type of structure, grade elevations, sidewalks, utilities, roads, parking areas, mechanical and electrical systems, and such other work as may be required.

  • Design Development Phase INDICATE IN STATEMENT OF WORK “NOT APPLICABLE” IF SECTION IS NOT APPLICABLE

  • CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT & PROMOTION FUND 19.01 The Employer shall contribute to the Union’s Construction Industry Development and Promotion Fund (the “Industry Fund”) the amount identified at Schedule “A” for each hour worked by each employee covered by this Agreement, and it shall remit such contributions to the Union together with union dues, and in the manner described in the Remittances to the Union article and in the Union’s remittance directives.

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A. The Board agrees to implement the following:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.