Discussion of main findings Sample Clauses

Discussion of main findings. A time consuming and complicated application process was identified as an impediment to the development of LTS aquaculture in all cases and regions. Lengthy application processes may be difficult to avoid in practice, i.e. due to regulatory complexity, requirements to involve several administrative or expert agencies or uncertainties or lack of knowledge in cases involving new species or production methods. The workshops pointed to several measures considered to have a potential to improve this aspect. These include dedicated efforts to simplify the regulatory framework (Sweden, section 4.1), guidance in the form of a regulatory scout (Germany, section 3.1), guidance in the form of web resources (Norway, section 3.2), and industry networks facilitating knowledge sharing (Norway, section 3.2). For the case of IMTA in South Africa, it was proposed that more direct dialogues between the industry applicants, administrators and scientists could help to reduce the application time for licences for new species in research. Workshop participants in South Africa did not note major policy constraints for IMTA but pointed to specific deficiencies with the regulatory framework for this type of production. In turn, the overall perception from stakeholders in the workshop on IMTA in Brazil is that the Brazilian policies fail to support or help the development and adoption of IMTA. Timing of regulations is seen as a key factor, with macroalgae practitioners in Norway and Scotland being Regulatory deficiencies specific for novel LTS aquaculture systems Workshop participants expressed that the development of IMTA in South Africa and in Brazil is impeded by regulatory deficiencies specific to IMTA as a novel type of aquaculture. In the case of South Africa, mentioned deficiencies concern a lack of regulatory provision for testing and monitoring, whereas regulatory deficiencies addressed in Brazil seem to be of a more general scope. Regulatory deficiencies were also identified as a barrier for the development of offshore aquaculture, as regulatory uncertainty will be seen to involve significant investment risks. Food safety In most cases addressed, workshop participants were concerned that novel LTS aquaculture production forms may be hampered by inadequacies in food safety procedures for the respective production forms and resulting products. Food safety concerns were brought up in relation to macroalgae cultivation in Norway, concerning harmful product components (iodine, ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Discussion of main findings

  • NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC EVENTS AND MEETINGS 2 A. CONTRACTOR shall notify ADMINISTRATOR of any public event or meeting funded in 3 whole or in part by the COUNTY, except for those events or meetings that are intended solely to serve 4 clients or occur in the normal course of business.

  • COMPLETION OF MEET AND NEGOTIATION 24.1 During the term of this Agreement, the Association expressly waives and relinquishes the right to meet and negotiate and agrees that the District shall not be obligated to meet and negotiate with respect to any subject or matter whether referred to or covered in this Agreement or not, even though each subject or matters may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both the District or the Association at the time they met and negotiated on and executed this Agreement, and even though such subjects or matters were proposed and later withdrawn.

  • Restricting on disclosure and use of the Confidential Information 5.1 The Receiving Party undertakes not to use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than:

  • Rules of Competition Concerning Undertakings 1. The following are incompatible with the proper functioning of this Agreement in so far as they may affect trade between the Parties:

  • Evaluation of Proposals 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.

  • EVENTS CONSTITUTING MATERIAL BREACH OF AGREEMENT The Applicant shall be in Material Breach of this Agreement if it commits one or more of the following acts or omissions (each a “Material Breach”):

  • COMPLETION OF MEET AND NEGOTIATE During the term of this Agreement, the parties waive and relinquish the right to meet and negotiate except as provided below and elsewhere in this Agreement, and agree that they shall not be obligated to meet and negotiate with respect to any subject or matter referred to or covered in this Agreement, nor on those subjects or matters which were proposed by either party and later withdrawn. Negotiations may be reopened at any time on any section of this contract on petition of either party and with the concurrence of the second party.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be submitted to the attention of Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx-Green, via e- mail at XXX.Xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxXXX.xxx no later than 5:00 p.m. Central, Wednesday, March 10, 2021.

  • Reliance by the State on Representations All payments by the State under this Agreement will be made in reliance upon the accuracy of all representations made by the Party in accordance with this Agreement, including but not limited to bills, invoices, progress reports and other proofs of work.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!