Effects Analysis Sample Clauses

Effects Analysis. Motorized Roads & Trails, Nonmotorized Trails, & Closure Implementation Action: Building new motorized roads and trails, nonmotorized trails, and closing and reclaiming routes including the associated conservation measures.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Effects Analysis. Small-Scale Infrastructure Action: Authorizing maintenance of existing small-scale water developments in term permits for grazing, rights-of-way authorizations, and easements. Administrative installation of small-scale infrastructure, including signs, kiosks, vault toilets, vehicle barriers, concentrated parking areas, culverts, gates, cattle guards. Actions include the associated conservation measures. Direct and Indirect Effects Water Developments The maintenance of water developments – removing sediment deposits and/or re- compacting dam structure — can result in the temporary removal of vegetation within and immediately adjacent to the water development footprint. However, these footprints have been previously disturbed and will not contain sagebrush canopy consistent with site-scale PCEs 2-4, and rarely exhibit other native shrub or herbaceous cover. Nonetheless, these areas could become conducive to weed propagation and spread. Other Small-scale Infrastructure The installation of vault toilets, concentrated parking areas, culverts, gates, and cattle guards may require removal of site-scale PCEs. Construction is not anticipated to result in significant disturbance to nearby birds, as construction will be of a very short duration and in a very localized area. It is reasonable to suspect that some of the identified small-scale infrastructure could serve as perches for raptors or corvids, which would facilitate predation. Benefits and Conservation Measures Water Developments Concentrated livestock use for water developments helps reduce disturbances across occupied habitat. Many of these structures have been developed to divert livestock use from natural water sources such as seeps and springs, thus avoiding localized damage of important brood-rearing habitats. Many of these cattle ponds are developed for water retention and consequently sediment retention, which creates mesic sites with food sources that could be used for brood-rearing habitat, or PCE 5. These areas also provide insects that may not have otherwise been available, and improve watersheds downstream that often times succumb to high-flow events. Furthermore, well-maintained and -managed water developments provides for water retention and infiltration in surrounding soils, providing mesic sites (PCE 5) suitable for summer and late fall sage-grouse habitat. Conducting maintenance activities in accordance with the integrated weed management measures reduces the risk of weed spread to proximal ...
Effects Analysis. Medium-Scale Infrastructure Action: Rights-of-way and easement authorizations for new transmission lines, communication towers, pipelines and associated access routes. Re-authorizations for maintenance of such rights-of-way, easements, and their access routes. Actions include associated conservation measures. Direct and Indirect Effects USFWS analysis indicates that “68 percent of the Gunnison Basin population area is within 4.3 miles of an electrical transmission line and is potentially influenced by avian predators utilizing the additional perches…These results suggest that potential increased predation resulting from transmission lines have the potential to affect a substantial portion of the Gunnison Basin population” (75 FR 187, p. 59819). Additionally, power lines can pose as a collision and electrocution hazard to grouse (Xxxxx 1998, pp.145-146; Xxxxxxxx et al. 2000a, p. 974). NPS researchers recorded 2 adult GUSG mortalities directly related to collisions with large overhead power lines collisions (0.04% of sample) while conducting a 12-year radio-telemetry study of sage-grouse in the western Gunnison Basin.
Effects Analysis 

Related to Effects Analysis

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • SAMPLE (i) Unless agreed otherwise, wheeled or track lay- ing equipment shall not be operated in areas identified as needing special measures except on roads, landings, tractor roads, or skid trails approved under B5.1 or B6.422. Purchaser may be required to backblade skid trails and other ground disturbed by Purchaser’s Opera- tions within such areas in lieu of cross ditching required under B6.6. Additional special protection measures needed to protect such known areas are identified in C6.24.

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

  • Segmentation The purchase of any Products and related Service Offerings or other Service Offerings are all separate offers and separate from any other order for any Products and related Service Offerings or other Service Offerings You may receive or have received from Oracle. You understand that You may purchase any Products and related Service Offerings or other Service Offerings independently of any other Products or Service Offerings. Your obligation to pay for (a) any Products and related Service Offerings is not contingent on performance of any other Service Offerings or delivery of any other Products or (b) other Service Offerings is not contingent on delivery of any Products or performance of any additional/other Service Offerings. You acknowledge that You have entered into the purchase without reliance on any financing or leasing arrangement with Oracle or its affiliate.

  • SERVICE MONITORING, ANALYSES AND ORACLE SOFTWARE 11.1 We continuously monitor the Services to facilitate Oracle’s operation of the Services; to help resolve Your service requests; to detect and address threats to the functionality, security, integrity, and availability of the Services as well as any content, data, or applications in the Services; and to detect and address illegal acts or violations of the Acceptable Use Policy. Oracle monitoring tools do not collect or store any of Your Content residing in the Services, except as needed for such purposes. Oracle does not monitor, and does not address issues with, non-Oracle software provided by You or any of Your Users that is stored in, or run on or through, the Services. Information collected by Oracle monitoring tools (excluding Your Content) may also be used to assist in managing Oracle’s product and service portfolio, to help Oracle address deficiencies in its product and service offerings, and for license management purposes.

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!