Electronic Plan Review Sample Clauses

Electronic Plan Review. Consultant has more than ten (10) years of experience providing electronic plan reviews to many of its clients. Electronic plan review services incorporate “green” technology by reducing paper refuge and eliminating shipping costs. A. PLAN REVIEW SERVICES 1. All fire plan reviews will be billed at the hourly rates noted in the Table of Hourly Billing Rates listed below. Expedited reviews, which are performed in half the time noted in Exhibit “A”, will be billed at of 150% of the above noted fees contingent upon the availability of staff to perform these expedited reviews. The fees noted herein are good for the first two (2) years of the Agreement and for a maximum of $40,000. 2. Invoices for work performed during the previous month will be sent out at the beginning of each month, unless requested otherwise by the Client. Payment must be received within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Electronic Plan Review. Within 30 days of contract execution, CONSULTANT shall offer an optional Internet-based system where project stakeholders may submit plans, calculations, and other information electronically, directly from their computer, with no need for printing and shipping and receive comments back electronically (“E-submittal”). CONSULTANT shall provide training for project stakeholders as needed at no cost to the CITY. E-submittal shall be advertised as necessary at the Building Counter and City website. E-submittal can be a commercially available product or one developed in-house, but all software and hardware needed shall be provided and maintained by the CONSULTANT; provided, that E-submittal users must provide their own hardware and internet browser to access E-submittal. E-submittal shall have provisions for project stakeholders to conference with plan reviewer over the telephone. Access to E-submittal shall be provided to City personnel to perform associated plan review and comment. E-submittal will be provided free of charge to City customers and City employees.
Electronic Plan Review. Consultant has more than ten (10) years of experience providing electronic plan reviews to many of its clients. Electronic plan review services incorporate “green” technology by reducing paper refuge and eliminating shipping costs. a) Review of one or more aspects of the submitted plans and design (as assigned) such as structural, architectural, accessibility, mechanical, HVAC design, plumbing, electrical, fuel gas, energy code, wildland urban interface compliance, and other areas as applicable. Reviews shall be conducted via the MSD’s planning and development software as necessary. b) Verify and provide to the MSD the square footages for areas of new construction, addition, and/or remodeling for the following: • Residential: Affected remodel area, new finished basement areas, new unfinished basement areas (including cold storage and similar types, furnace/mechanical rooms, etc.), new habitable areas, deck(s), covered patio(s), carport(s), garage(s), accessory structures (gazebo, pool house, retaining walls, etc.) • Commercial: Commercial: Affected remodel areas, areas of different occupancy classification and type of construction, deck(s), covered patio(s), carport(s), garage(s), accessory structures (gazebo, pool house, retaining walls, etc.) c) All details should match the referenced section in the plans. d) Deferred submittals are not allowed (unless prior MSD authorization has been given). e) Phased submittals (footings and foundations with engineering calculations) are subject to approval by the building official. f) Evaluation Service (E.S.) Reports if applicable must be attached for field reviewers. g) Reviewer to provide both correction list & corrections response sheets for all reviews. h) Reviewer to provide back to the MSD an electronic set of the final accepted plans, calculations, specifications, and other related documentation for the building permit issuance. i) Reviewer will be required to handle plan review workloads in the Planning and Development Services Department in an efficient and expeditious manner. Initial reviews will need to be completed within 10 business days and each subsequent review or change will need to be completed within 5 business days. Exceptions will be clearly communicated to the Chief Building Official or Director of Planning and Development. j) These services may also be performed as part of the MSD’s response to a natural disaster or emergency event. A. GENERAL FEE INFORMATION 1. Inflation: Rates are subject to ...

Related to Electronic Plan Review

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Claims Review The IRO shall perform the Claims Review annually to cover each of the five Reporting Periods. The IRO shall perform all components of each Claims Review.

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Enrollment The Competitive Supplier shall be responsible for enrolling all Eligible Consumers through EDI transactions submitted to the LDC for all enrollments of Eligible Consumers during the term of this Agreement.

  • Participant Bound by Plan Participant hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees to be bound by all the terms and provisions thereof.

  • Appeal Panel Award The Appeal Panel shall issue its decision (the “Appeal Panel Award”) through the lead arbitrator on the Appeal Panel. Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, the Appeal Panel Award shall (a) supersede in its entirety and make of no further force or effect the Arbitration Award (provided that any protective orders issued by the Original Arbitrator shall remain in full force and effect), (b) be final and binding upon the parties, with no further rights of appeal, (c) be the sole and exclusive remedy between the parties regarding any Claims, counterclaims, issues, or accountings presented or pleaded in the Arbitration, and (d) be promptly payable in United States dollars free of any tax, deduction or offset (with respect to monetary awards). Any costs or fees, including without limitation attorneys’ fees, incurred in connection with or incident to enforcing the Appeal Panel Award shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, be charged against the party resisting such enforcement. The Appeal Panel Award shall include Default Interest (with respect to monetary awards) at the rate specified in the Note for Default Interest both before and after the Arbitration Award. Judgment upon the Appeal Panel Award will be entered and enforced by a state or federal court sitting in Salt Lake County, Utah.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!