Subsequent Review Sample Clauses

Subsequent Review. A) When the Commission approves a salary rate above the minimum pursuant to 14.2.1.1 A) 1. above, they will publicize in the Government of Saskatchewan's Career Centre the rate at which it has given such approval and an outline of the qualifications of the person appointed.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Subsequent Review. Up to one additional review of revised drainage reports and models will be performed by the Consultant. Any other additional reviews are not included in this contract. The review will be completed within 14 calendar days of notice of re-submittal. If initial comments issued during the initial review have been addressed in the subsequent submittal, Consultant will prepare a letter notifying District's Project Manager that the submittal complies with current drainage criteria for Fort Bend County. If initial comments are not fully addressed in the subsequent submittal, the District will be notified accordingly. The Consultant will coordinate any other additional reviews with the District in accordance with Task 2.2.
Subsequent Review. [No longer used]
Subsequent Review. 7.1 On a country-by-country basis, Harvest shall be entitled to discontinue any Earned Royalty payments under Section 4.2 of this Agreement with respect to a Licensed Product immediately upon the occurrence of the following with respect to all Claims of Licensed Patents covering such Licensed Product:
Subsequent Review. 7.1 Medtronic shall be entitled to discontinue any Earned Royalty payments under Article 4.2 of this Agreement in respect to any country or non-US foreign territory where a Licensed Patent exists immediately upon the occurrence of:
Subsequent Review. Whether or not Purchaser shall have furnished to Seller any objection to matters disclosed on the Title Commitment or Survey pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this Agreement, Purchaser may, at or prior to Closing, notify Seller in writing of any objections to title or matters of survey first arising or raised by the Title Company or the surveyor between the effective date of the Title Commitment or the Survey (as applicable), and the Closing Date (“Gap Period Objections”), so long as such title or survey matter is not attributable to Purchaser or Purchaser’s inspections. Each party shall notify the other of any Gap Period Objections by written notice within two (2) business days of learning of the Gap Period Objections. Purchaser reserves the right to date down the Title Commitment at any time (at its expense) in order to verify that no Gap Period Objections have arisen, provided that the additional cost or expense of any such date down shall be borne by Purchaser. Subject to Seller’s obligation to cure Unpermitted Title Exceptions which shall also apply to any Gap Period Objections (but only to the extent the same are not attributable to Purchaser), Seller shall have until the earlier of two (2) business days after receipt of Purchaser’s notice of any Gap Period Objection, or the Closing Date, to give Purchaser notice that (i) Seller will remove or cure such Gap Period Objection; or (ii) Seller elects not to cause such Gap Period Objection to be removed or cured. If Seller agrees to cure the Gap Period Objection, then Seller shall do so prior to the Closing Date. If such objection is not so cured or satisfied, and such Gap Period Objection 400 X. Xxxxxxxxx PSA 10 is not attributable to Purchaser, then Purchaser may by written notice to Seller either (a) terminate this Agreement, in which case the Xxxxxxx Money shall be returned to Purchaser by Escrow Agent, and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder, except for those provided in Paragraph 8.2 if any such Gap Period Objection is the result of any breach of this Agreement by Seller, and except for those which expressly survive any such termination, or (b) waive its objections hereunder and proceed with the transaction pursuant to the remaining terms and conditions of this Agreement.

Related to Subsequent Review

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Annual Statement as to Compliance, Notice of Servicer Termination Event (a) To the extent required by Section 1123 of Regulation AB, the Servicer, shall deliver to the Trustee, the Owner Trustee, the Trust Collateral Agent and each Rating Agency, on or before March 31 (or 90 days after the end of the Issuer’s fiscal year, if other than December 31) of each year (regardless of whether the Seller has ceased filing reports under the Exchange Act), beginning on March 31, 2020, an officer’s certificate signed by any Responsible Officer of the Servicer, dated as of December 31 of the previous calendar year, stating that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year (or such other period as shall have elapsed from the Closing Date to the date of the first such certificate) and of its performance under this Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision, and (ii) to such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all material respects all its obligations under this Agreement throughout such period, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, identifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status of such failure.

  • Evaluation Period Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis are time-limited and will terminate immediately upon the earlier of (i) the trial end date as specified in an Order Form or other document executed by the parties regarding such trial, or (ii) the start date of when Customer purchases a right to use such Services on a non-Trial Basis, or (iii) the date when QuoVadis terminates Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis (which QuoVadis may do at any time in its sole discretion). Customer must cease using the Services on a Trial Basis upon any such termination.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.