Evaluation of optimization approaches Sample Clauses

Evaluation of optimization approaches. The current concept for optimization in EAST-ADL is to develop an optimization architecture built around a central engine based on genetic algorithms that can leverage existing variability constructs in EAST-ADL and previous variability development work as well as linking with the various external analysis tools (for safety, timing, behaviour analysis etc.).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of optimization approaches. The current concept for optimization in EAST-ADL is to develop an optimization architecture built around a central engine based on genetic algorithms that can leverage existing variability constructs in EAST-ADL and previous variability development work as well as linking with the various external analysis tools (for safety, timing, behaviour analysis etc). As planned, the input to the process will be an EAST-ADL model that has been augmented with variability elements to define the potential design space (by establishing possible alternative architectural choices to be experimented with) as well as all data necessary for the analyses/evaluation of each object (e.g. an error model for safety analysis, etc). An initial function called the Optimization Space Definition Module (OSDM) will take this model and determine the possible design space. The Central Optimization Engine (XXX) then uses this as the basis of the optimization process, experimenting with different possibilities. Each design candidate is passed to the Variability Resolution Mechanism (VRM), which generates a new model variant with all optimization variability resolved for that given design candidate. This model variant can then be analysed by the external analysis tools and evaluated on the basis of their results. The XXX then tries new possibilities, keeping good candidates and discarding poor candidates, until it is told to stop. It then presents the list of good candidates it has kept so far, which form a Pareto front (a set representing optimal trade-offs between the various multiple optimization objectives - e.g. minimize cost, maximize safety etc). Each 'optimal' candidate can be generated on demand from the original model by the VRM, so the optimization is not creating and storing a huge set of variant models. At present the optimization architecture is still in the concept phase and so there is little validation or verification that can take place. Development of an optimization concept prototype is expected in the second year of MAENAD. Key points for the analysis • Availability of language construct for the definition of cost constraints • Correctness of Cost evaluation • Correctness of Energy consumption evaluation • Correctness of Current Consumption evaluation • Correctness of cable length evaluation • Correctness of power distribution evaluation • Correctness of Safety, Timing analysis etc • Ensure the generated 'optimal' candidate models are coherent and plausible Analysis stra...
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of optimization approaches

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • EVALUATION OF OPTIONS The County shall evaluate bids for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price of the basic period. However, the evaluation of options shall not obligate the County to exercise the option(s).

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • Implementation Program 1. The Borrower shall:

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Orientation Program The Company will allow a designated representative of the Local or Bargaining Unit up to one (1) hour per calendar month for the purpose of conducting the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union New Members’ Orientation Program. Such meetings will be conducted during the probationary period of employees, and will be held on Company premises. Employees participating in Orientation Program meetings during their normally scheduled working hours will not suffer loss of pay at their regular rate. Orientation Program meetings will be scheduled by Management and a Management representative may attend as an observer.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.