Evaluation Steps. I. Classroom teachers shall be observed for the purposes of evaluation using the observation and evaluation steps listed below.
Evaluation Steps. Step 1: Self-Assessment Each teacher shall reflect on his/her practice and complete the Framework for Teaching Self- Assessment document (Form A). This may also be completed using the eVal system. This is a personal reflection of practice and the teacher has the option of sharing or not sharing the written results with the administration. The self-assessment shall serve as a tool for the goal setting conference.
Evaluation Steps. Model import/export 1.: Export of an existing Use Case model to EAXML exchange format using tool “X”. 2:Import of the EAXML file generated in step 1 using tool “X” Evaluation: consistency check of generated EAXML output through file review, Models generated through EAXML import shall match the original
Evaluation Steps. The appropriate Department Head, or designee, will complete the performance appraisal form prior to meeting with the employee. Thereafter, the appropriate Department Head, or designee, will meet with the employee to review the performance appraisal report.
Evaluation Steps. Step 1: Self-Assessment
Evaluation Steps. All bids received as a result of this competitive bidding process will be analyzed and scored through a 4-step evaluation process: Eligibility Technical Evaluation Financial Evaluation Final Selection ELIGIBILITY Purpose: Ensure all bidders have submitted all mandatory documents as specified in the tender advert and documentation Eliminatory: YES Scoring Methodology: YES/NO, 100% yes to pass this phase TECHNICAL Purpose: Ensure bidder have the technical capability to provide the services requested. It may include a visit to vendor’s premises Eliminatory: NO Scoring Methodology: Progressive scoring with Weighting System. [Maximum of 40% of Overall Evaluation Process] FINANCIAL Purpose: Assessing financial competitiveness of the bidder for key services Eliminatory: NO Scoring Methodology: Progressive scoring with Weighting System. [Maximum of 60% of Overall Evaluation Process] Criteria Evaluation phase Means of verification Weight Mandatory documentation- Bidders need to present official & valid documents (Registrations and 2018 tax) as required by local law & IMC. Eligibility Evaluation Requested documents to be submitted with the bids. Yes/No (1 No = disqualification)
Evaluation Steps. All bids received as a result of this competitive bidding process will be analyzed and scored through a 4-step evaluation process: Eligibility Technical Evaluation Financial Evaluation Final Selection ELIGIBILITY Purpose: Ensure all bidders have submitted all mandatory documents as specified in the tender advert and documentation Eliminatory: YES Scoring Methodology: YES/NO, 100% yes to pass this phase TECHNICAL Purpose: Ensure bidder have the technical capability to provide the services requested. It may include a visit to vendor’s premises Eliminatory: NO Scoring Methodology: Progressive scoring with Weighting system. [Maximum of 30 points] FINANCIAL Purpose: Assessing financial competitiveness of the bidder for key services Eliminatory: NO Scoring Methodology: Progressive scoring with Weighting system. [Maximum of 70 points] Criteria Evaluation phase Means of verification Weight Mandatory documentation- Bidders need to present official & valid documents. Please find the attached Annex 1 – Mandatory documents Eligibility Evaluation Requested documents to be submitted with the bids. Yes/No (1 No = disqualification) Fleet Capacity- Company can provide % of the requested fleet, locations and drivers Technical & Capability Evaluation Bid & Visit 30% Price Competitiveness- Monthly rate Financial-Commercial Evaluation Bid 70%
Evaluation Steps. A. Step 1: Self-Assessment
Evaluation Steps
