AUTOSAR Gateway Clause Samples

AUTOSAR Gateway. Procedures AUTOSAR Gateway (ARGateway) is designed for the generation of an AUTOSAR compliant architecture from an EAST-ADL2 model. The generation process is twofold, namely from EAST- ADL2 model generation of an AUTOSAR model takes place and from this model, ARXML file can be generated. This is shown on the Figure 5-13. These two processes can be triggered separately by the user. Naturally, an AUTOSAR model first has to be generated. In order to represent the EAST-ADL2 specification, UML profile for the EAST-ADL2 is used. The same solution holds for the modelling of the AUTOSAR architectures. Therefore the first transformation is a transformation between the model expressed with the EAST-ADL2 UML profile and the model expressed with the AUTOSAR UML profile. Generation of a model based on the AUTOSAR UML profile first, instead of direct generation of an ARXML file from the EAST-ADL2 model (which was the approach used in the previous implementation of an AUTOSAR Gateway) has a significant advantage. Namely, the designer can manually change the final design of an implementation level working directly on the models. Current version of the AUTOSAR Gateway features with a predefined approach for the generation of a software architecture. In fact the generation of a software architecture, i.e. software component prototypes and their internal behaviour, poses the main question. In our predefined approach, software architecture is mostly generated based on the compositional structure of a functional specification. Non-elementary functions are transformed into composite software components. Each elementary function is transformed into the runnable entity and runnable entities are grouped into the software components in a way in which elementary functions were grouped into the non-elementary functions. Of course if two elementary functions were grouped into the same non-elementary function, but allocated to different nodes, their corresponding runnable entities will not state a part of the same internal behaviour. Previous implementation of an AUTOSAR Gateway was following simpler approach where for each elementary function, one atomic software component with one runnable entity have been generated. Evaluation Results AUTOSAR Gateway has been tested on the EAST-ADL2 model representing the Brake-by-Wire. The results are shown on a set of below figures. Result of a first step of a transformation this is a UML model stereotyped with an AUTOSAR UML profile. This model i...
View SourceView Similar (2)
AUTOSAR Gateway. The AUTOSAR gateway builds on results from EDONA and ATESST2 projects to provide an enhanced transformation from the EAST-ADL design architecture to AUTOSAR vehicle architecture design and initial system configuration. The gateway is based on the ARTOP framework, which is an implementation of common base functionality for AUTOSAR development tools, available free of charge for AUTOSAR members [5]. The transformation takes as input the EAST-ADL Design Level with functional description, hardware description and allocation information and generates a tentative AUTOSAR software architecture, a hardware topology and mapping constraints (coming from EAST-ADL allocation information). The generation of the tentative software architecture is based on mappings between EAST-ADL functions and AUTOSAR software components/runnables that fit in the EAST-ADL Implementation Level.
View Source
AUTOSAR Gateway. The AUTOSAR gateway builds on results from EDONA and ATESST2 projects to provide an enhanced transformation from EAST-ADL design architecture to AUTOSAR compliant software architecture, based on the ARTOP framework, which is an implementation of common base functionality for AUTOSAR development tools, available free of charge for AUTOSAR members [5]. The transformation also takes into account allocations and hardware description architecture from the EAST-ADL model to generate a tentative topology for the AUTOSAR architecture.
View Source
AUTOSAR Gateway. AUTOSAR is an open and standardized automotive software architecture, jointly developed by manufacturers, suppliers and tool developers. EAST-ADL complements AUTOSAR in several ways. The EAST-ADL metamodel is specified according to the same rules of the AUTOSAR metamodel, and AUTOSAR elements can be referenced by EAST-ADL elements. The result is a compositional metamodel where functional architecture aspects and software architecture aspects coexist, and are capable of enriching AUTOSAR with timing constraints, safety constraints and support for safety analysis, support for requirements engineering, variability management. The goal of the AUTOSAR gateway is to provide an effective means for automatic model transformation from an EAST-ADL design architecture to an AUTOSAR software architecture, supporting the engineers during the design phases. More precisely, the AUTOSAR gateway takes a ▇▇▇▇▇-enriched EAST-ADL model as input, i.e. an EAST-ADL design function architecture and hardware description architecture, together with a software architecture using ▇▇▇▇▇ constructs (i.e. RtUnits). In this enriched model, each EAST- ADL elementary function is allocated to the ▇▇▇▇▇ software components which themselves are mapped to hardware elements (the same kind of description is made for the Timing analysis see above). From this, an Autosar architecture is generated which tries to export as much information as possible. Essentially the core transformation is to map EAST-ADL each elementary function to a Runnable, then use the ▇▇▇▇▇ software architecture description and allocation to regroup Runnables in different software components. Depending on the allocation of software component on hardware elements, different communication mechanisms are generated in the Autosar model, e.g. inter-variable mechanism for collocated elements. The resulting Autosar model is provided as a file in Autosar xml format, using the ARTOP implementation of Autosar in Eclipse. Note that use of this and development with the ARTOP framework is open for AR members only. It is intended in the course of the MAENAD project to define an Autosar UML profile so that modelling of an Autosar architecture could be feasible within EAST-ADL models in the Modeling Workbench. When available, the AR gateway will be adapted so that parts of the transformations will also be available within the modelling workbench, to complement an EAST-ADL UML model with AR elements directly in the UML model. Key points for t...
View Source
AUTOSAR Gateway 
View Source

Related to AUTOSAR Gateway

  • Unbundled Network Terminating Wire (UNTW) 2.8.3.1 UNTW is unshielded twisted copper wiring that is used to extend circuits from an intra-building network cable terminal or from a building entrance terminal to an individual End User’s point of demarcation. It is the final portion of the Loop that in multi-subscriber configurations represents the point at which the network branches out to serve individual subscribers. 2.8.3.2 This element will be provided in MDUs and/or Multi-Tenants Units (MTUs) where either Party owns wiring all the way to the End User’s premises. Neither Party will provide this element in locations where the property owner provides its own wiring to the End User’s premises, where a third party owns the wiring to the End User’s premises.

  • Connectivity User is solely responsible for providing and maintaining all necessary electronic communications with Exchange, including, wiring, computer hardware, software, communication line access, and networking devices.

  • Trunk Group Architecture and Traffic Routing 5.2.1 The Parties shall jointly establish Access Toll Connecting Trunks between CLEC and CBT by which they will jointly provide Tandem-transported Switched Exchange Access Services to Interexchange Carriers to enable such Interexchange Carriers to originate and terminate traffic from and to CLEC's Customers. 5.2.2 Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be used solely for the transmission and routing of Exchange Access and non-translated Toll Free traffic (e.g., 800/888) to allow CLEC’s Customers to connect to or be connected to the interexchange trunks of any Interexchange Carrier that is connected to the CBT access Tandem. 5.2.3 The Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be one-way or two-way trunks, as mutually agreed, connecting an End Office Switch that CLEC utilizes to provide Telephone Exchange Service and Switched Exchange Access Service in the given LATA to an access Tandem Switch CBT utilizes to provide Exchange Access in the LATA.

  • Workstation/Laptop encryption All workstations and laptops that process and/or store County PHI or PI must be encrypted using a FIPS 140-2 certified algorithm which is 128bit or higher, such as Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). The encryption solution must be full disk unless approved by the County Information Security Office.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where Freedom has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to Freedom. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for Freedom (e.g. hairpinning): 1. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to any spare copper that exists to the customer premises. 2. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to an existing DLC that is not integrated. 3. If capacity exists, provide "side-door" porting through the switch. 4. If capacity exists, provide "Digital Access Cross Connect System (DACS)- door" porting (if the IDLC routes through a DACS prior to integration into the switch). 2.6.2 Arrangements 3 and 4 above require the use of a designed circuit. Therefore, non- designed Loops such as the SL1 voice grade and UCL-ND may not be ordered in these cases. 2.6.3 If no alternate facility is available, and upon request from Freedom, and if agreed to by both Parties, BellSouth may utilize its Special Construction (SC) process to determine the additional costs required to provision facilities. Freedom will then have the option of paying the one-time SC rates to place the Loop.