Extension of Deadline Sample Clauses
Extension of Deadline. Section H of the Agreement is deleted in its --------------------- entirety and the following is substituted therefor: If the Merger Agreement has not been entered into by 5:00 p.m. New York City time on March 2, 2001, or, if entered into, the Merger Agreement is subsequently terminated, this Term Sheet shall become null and void, unless extended by mutual agreement of the parties, except that each party shall continue to be bound by the provisions relating to Expenses.
Extension of Deadline. Section 14 of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace "May 1, 2024" with "December 31, 2024".
Extension of Deadline. (a) The second sentence of Section 5.6(a) of the Agreement shall hereby be replaced in its entirety with the following: “The Buyer shall have until May 31, 2012 to complete the 144A Offering and if the 144A Offering is not complete by such date, either the Buyer or the Seller may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(a)(iv).”
(b) The phrase “one hundred fifty (150) days after the date hereof” in Section 8.1(a)(iv) shall be replaced with “May 31, 2012”.
Extension of Deadline. In the event that the Notary has not been provided with all documents and information from the Grantor as are necessary for the execution of the Sale, the time period set forth in Article 5.1 hereinabove for the purchase by the Beneficiary shall automatically be extended until the tenth Business Day following that on which the Notary shall have been provided with the last of the requisite documents or information, it being specified that the date of execution of the Sale shall not be postponed by more than two (2) months following the date set forth in the notification of Offer referred to in Article 5 hereinabove.
Extension of Deadline. Subject to the proviso in the second sentence of this Section 3.3.8(b), if Xxxxxxx submits a Proposed Substitution Notice on or before the Proposed Substitution Deadline for an Initial Target, but if (i) the applicable Proposed Substitute Target is not Available, (ii) the applicable Proposed Substitute Target is a Synaffix Unavailable Target (and is not a Non-Synaffix Target) or (iii) Competition Law Filings are required with respect to such Target and a Party withdraws such Proposed Substitution Notice in accordance with Section 3.6.1(b), then, in each case, the Proposed Substitution Deadline shall be extended for an additional [**] to permit Xxxxxxx to provide a new Proposed Substitution Notice to Mersana. A Proposed Substitution Deadline may be extended in accordance with the first sentence of this Section 3.3.8(b) multiple times until either (x) Xxxxxxx provides a Proposed Substitution Notice for a Proposed Substitute Target that is Available and is a Synaffix Available Target, or (y) Xxxxxxx fails to deliver a new Proposed Substitution Notice to Mersana by the extended Proposed Substitution Deadline; provided that the Proposed Substitution Deadline for the first Target Substitution Right exercised by Xxxxxxx under this Agreement shall be no later than [**] before the deadline for exercise of the Initial Target Substitution Right with respect to the applicable Initial Target under Section 2.9(a) of the Synaffix Agreement, unless the Proposed Substitute Target with respect to such Initial Target is a Non-Synaffix Target.
Extension of Deadline. It has been brought to the LMC’s attention that a considerable number of GPs did not receive the email from Xxxx Xxxxxxx dated Friday 11 March and, therefore, did not receive the LMC’s GP Commissioning Poll. This was due to problems with our email provider, which resulted in our emails to various email accounts being blocked. Our email provider has since remedied the situation and issued a statement which can be accessed via the Facts & Info section of the LMC website at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx- xxx.xxx.xx/Xxxxx/Xxxxxxxx_xxxx_XX C_Email_Communications.pdf In light of the difficulties experienced with the distribution of the poll, and the importance of ensuring that all represented GPs have the opportunity to express their views, the decision was made to redistribute the poll to non responders and to extend the deadline for responses to Thursday 21 April. If you are a represented, Sheffield GP who did not receive the poll in March, you should have received an email acknowledging and remedying this on Tuesday 5 April 2011. Please accept our sincere apologies for this unfortunate situation. We hope that the extended deadline (originally Friday 8 April) will allow sufficient time for all GPs to take part in this important information gathering exercise. If you have not yet returned your poll to the LMC office, we would urge you to take this opportunity to ensure that your views are heard. If you would like to discuss the poll or if you have any concerns about the process, please do not hesitate to contact the LMC office via email to xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx. We understand that the IT problems outlined above also affected the distribution of the March 2011 LMC newsletter, although to a much lesser degree. If you normally receive LMC newsletters and did not receive the March edition, please note that this is available to view on the LMC website at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx- xxx.xxx.xx/Xxxxxxxxxxx_00/Xxx00.xx f ≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡ This is a free interactive seminar / workshop hosted by Sheffield Local Medical Committee and the Sheffield Faculty of the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), to explore the views and approach to commissioning that grassroots GPs and clinicians share. The event: • will cover some key local commissioning issues, as well as being an opportunity to introduce the RCGP Clinical Commissioning Framework. • is for all Sheffield GPs and Practice Managers and does not require any prior commissioning experience. • includes a Persona...
Extension of Deadline. The parties hereby agree to extend the Effectiveness Deadline from April 2, 2022 to June 2, 2022.
Extension of Deadline. Requisite Holder and Sole Holder hereby, effective as of May 7, 2015, extend the Deadline to deliver the Opinions of Counsel required pursuant Section 5.05 of the Indenture (in regards to the first anniversary of the First Issue Date) to (x) May 12, 2015 with respect to the Opinion of Counsel on behalf of Company and Gevo Development, LLC and (y) June 8, 2015 with respect to the Opinion of Counsel on behalf of Agri-Energy.
Extension of Deadline. Subject to the proviso in the second sentence of this Section 3.2.5(b), if Xxxxxxx submits a Proposed Target Notice on or before the Proposed Target Deadline for an Initial Target, but if (i) the applicable Proposed Target is not Available, (ii) the applicable Proposed Target is a Synaffix Unavailable Target (and is a Synaffix Target) or (iii) Competition Law Filings are required with respect to such Initial Target and a Party withdraws such Proposed Target Notice in accordance with Section 3.6.1(b), then, in each case, such Proposed Target Deadline shall be extended for an additional [**] to permit Xxxxxxx to provide a new Proposed Target Notice to Mersana. A Proposed Target Deadline may be extended in accordance with the first sentence of this Section 3.2.5(b) multiple times until either (x) there is a Target Selection Date for such Initial Target, or (y) Xxxxxxx fails to deliver a new Proposed Target Notice to Mersana by the extended Proposed Target Deadline; provided, however, that the Proposed Target Deadline may not be extended past [**] prior to the Option Term Expiration Date (as defined in the Synaffix Agreement) for the applicable Option (as defined in the Synaffix Agreement) under the Synaffix Agreement unless the Proposed Target is a Non-Synaffix Target.
Extension of Deadline. The parties hereby agree to extend the Effectiveness Deadline from December 31, 2021 to the sooner of (i) June 30, 2022, or (ii) 30 days from the date the Investor provides written notice to the Company that requesting the filing of an amendment to the Registration Statement.