Final Conclusion Sample Clauses

Final Conclusion. If due to force majeure will not be possible to perform by the Seller contract in accordance with the contract, he is entitled to defer the delivery date until the cessation of force majeure and its consequences, and if you can not identify the obstacles arising from the completion of the Seller shall be entitled to a partial or total withdrawal to the agreement without the ensuing further obligations to the Purchaser. The postponement of delivery and partial or complete waiver by the Seller of the agreement does not create a basis for any claims by the Purchaser, including compensation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Final Conclusion. Thanks to the differentiated and comparative analysis of the responses of the two groups of professionals, we could identify which are the most important knowledge that the responsible person - IMS Manager / Responsible for the IMS – needs to possess to design, implement and maintain an INTEGRATED SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (IMS) in a furniture manufacturing SME. EASIMS will put efforts on developing training content in the field of process management, since this field has been valued as the most important (high level - very high) by experienced professionals and in which not-experienced professionals admit having a medium - low knowledge. Meaning that this area is highly needed and there is a training gap. Moreover, we have to remind that for this area of process management very little or almost no training offer is available and accessible. According to experienced professionals, knowledge in standard requirements is highly important, although less than in process management and the related training offer is rich. Therefore, EASIMS will not develop training content for this area, although, reference will be made to existing and available ones. In relation to software for the IMS management, the importance of having knowledge is lower than in the rest of the aspects assessed, although the level of knowledge is low - very low. Therefore, EASIMS will cover also this aspect, but with less depth than process management. Annex 1 includes the survey that the experts have responded. Annex 2 includes the detailed survey results.
Final Conclusion. In summary, the four participating institutions, University College of Southeastern Norway (HSN), Stord/Haugesund University College (HSH), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), and UiT - The Arctic University of Norway (UiT) have proposed to create a joint PhD- program incorporating a well-composed course structure and with sufficient scientific breadth to have the potential to become internationally strong. The committee assesses that the institutions have satisfactorily complemented their application by responding to comments on criteria that must be satisfied.
Final Conclusion. 1) Contracting parties declare that all legal relations arising from this Contract are governed by Czech law, in particular the Civil Code, and further declare that the Agreement is not concluded in violation of good morals, which they confirm with their signatures 2) This Contract is written in four copies, of which the Buyer will receive three copies and Seller one copy. If the Contract is concluded electronically using recognized electronic signatures, only one copy of the Contract with the recognized electronic signatures of the representatives of both parties is issued. 3) The contracting parties declare that they do not consider the facts stated in this Contract to be trade secrets within the meaning of § 504 of the Civil Code and grant permission for their use and publication without specifying any other conditions 4) The Contract becomes valid on the date of signature by both contracting parties and becomes effective on the date of its publication in the register of contracts. 5) The contracting parties expressly agree that the publication of this Contract in the register of contracts in accordance with Act No. 340/2015 Coll., on special conditions for the effectiveness of certain contracts, publication of these contracts and on the register of contracts (Act on the Register of Contracts), as amended, will be ensured by the Buyer.
Final Conclusion. Recently, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx gave a clear characterisation of biblical prophecy in relation to ancient Near Eastern prophecy: Das Eigentümliche der israelitisch-judäischen Prophetie (insbesondere der ‘Schriftprofeten’) ist m.E. ... in erster Linie ein redaktionelles Phänomen, das eine Welt überdeckt, die der altorientalischen ähnlicher gewesen ist als die und vorliegenden Texte suggerieren.7 The present study confirms this view. The main conclusion of this study is, that the earliest stages of the Isaiah tradition, i.e. the prophetic material from the eighth century and its earliest revision in the seventh century, to a great extent correspond with the prophetic material of seventh-century Assyria. Three aspects of comparison have been worked out: 1) Prophetic oracles relate to particular historical circumstances, and prophets sought to interfere in events of major political importance. 2) Prophets served as mouthpieces of the gods; through their prophets the gods both supported the king and put their demands on him – with regard to both aspects, prophets functioned as guardians of the well-being of the state. 3) Prophecies were recorded, in collections and otherwise, and in some cases became the subject of reworking and elaboration. Furthermore, literary texts resembling or imitating prophecy emerged. The various manifestations of prophecy in literature served a royal interest.

Related to Final Conclusion

  • Special Condition With respect to Liability to the Fund or its shareholders, and subject to applicable state and federal law, the Board Member shall be indemnified pursuant to this Section 1 against any Liability unless such Liability arises by reason of the Board Member’s willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office as defined in such Section 17(h) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“Disabling Conduct”).

  • Financial Condition (a) The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet of Holdings and its consolidated Subsidiaries as at September 30, 2012 (the “Pro Forma Balance Sheet”), copies of which have heretofore been furnished to each Lender, has been prepared giving effect (as if such events had occurred on such date) to (i) the consummation of the Transactions, (ii) the Loans to be made on the Closing Date and the use of proceeds permitted under Section 8.15 thereof and (iii) the payment of fees and expenses on the Closing Date in connection with the foregoing. The Pro Forma Balance Sheet has been prepared based on the best information available to the Borrower as of the date of delivery thereof, and presents fairly in all material respects on a pro forma basis the estimated financial position of Holdings and its consolidated Subsidiaries as at September 30, 2012 assuming that the events specified in the preceding sentence had actually occurred at such date. (b) The audited consolidated balance sheets of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the fiscal years ended on December 31, 2011, reported on by and accompanied by an unqualified report as to going concern or scope of audit from Ernst & Young, LLP, present fairly in all material respects the consolidated financial condition of the Borrower and its Restricted Subsidiaries as at such date, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for the respective fiscal years then ended. All such financial statements, including the related schedules and notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied consistently throughout the periods involved (except as approved by the aforementioned firm of accountants and disclosed therein). No Group Member has, as of the Closing Date after giving effect to the Transactions and excluding obligations under the Loan Documents, any material Guarantee Obligations, contingent liabilities, or any long term leases or unusual forward or long term commitments, including any interest rate or foreign currency swap or exchange transaction or other obligation in respect of derivatives, which are required in conformity with GAAP to be disclosed therein and which are not reflected in the most recent financial statements referred to in this paragraph.

  • ORIGINAL CONDITIONS A. All reinsurance under this Contract shall be subject to the same rates, terms, conditions, waivers and interpretations and to the same modifications and alterations as the Policy, subject to the terms and conditions of this Contract, and the Reinsurer shall be credited with its exact proportion of the Insured's premiums due to the Company under the Policy. B. Nothing herein shall in any manner create any obligation or establish any right against the Reinsurer in favor of third parties or any persons not parties to this Contract except as provided with respect to the Insured in this Contract or in the Assumption of Liability Endorsement. C. In the event of a Quota Share Reduction, as that term is defined under the Policy, each Subscribing Reinsurer's participation percentage in this Contract shall be increased in the proportion that 100% bears to the total Subscribing Reinsurer's participation after the Quota Share Reduction. For the avoidance of doubt, such participation percentage increase is necessary to account for the reduction provisions of the Reduction Under Quota Share Contract Article of the Policy. If applicable, the Remaining Aggregate Retention, as that term is defined under the Policy, would likewise be adjusted. Any termination of a Subscribing Reinsurer's participation in this Contract shall not require the consent of any other Subscribing Reinsurer. As respects each Subscribing Reinsurer still participating on this Contract following the Reinsurer Reduction Date, as that term is defined under the Policy, in no event shall its share of the aggregate limit following the Reinsurer Reduction Date be greater than its share of the aggregate limit prior to the Reinsurer Reduction Date, notwithstanding that its participation percentage may increase as a result thereof. As an example, where the aggregate limit is $300,000,000 with each of three Subscribing Reinsurers retaining a 33.33% share ($100,000,000 each), and one Subscribing Reinsurer's share is terminated, then the resulting aggregate limit becomes $200,000,000 with each of the two remaining Subscribing Reinsurers retaining a 50.00% share (i.e., 33.33% x 100%/66.67%). As respects each of the two remaining Subscribing Reinsurers, its share of the aggregate limit shall remain at $100,000,000.

  • Investigation of Financial Condition Without in any manner reducing or otherwise mitigating the representations contained herein, Company shall have the opportunity to meet with Buyer's accountants and attorneys to discuss the financial condition of Buyer. Buyer shall make available to Company all books and records of Buyer.

  • Solvent Financial Condition Each of Borrower and its Subsidiaries is now and, after giving effect to the Loans to be made hereunder, at all times will be, Solvent.

  • CERTIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION By submission of this bid, the Bidder certifies, and in the case of a joint bid each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, that in connection with this procurement: A. The prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, collusion, communication, or agreement for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other bidder or with any competitor. B. Unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the Bidder and will not knowingly be disclosed by the Bidder prior to opening, directly or indirectly to any other Bidder or to any competitor; and, C. No attempt has been made or shall be made by the Bidder to induce any other person or bidder to submit or not to submit a bid for the purpose of restricting competition.

  • SUBMISSION OF THE MONTHLY MI REPORT 4.1 The completed MI Report shall be completed electronically and returned to the Authority by uploading the electronic MI Report computer file to MISO in accordance with the instructions provided in MISO. 4.2 The Authority reserves the right (acting reasonably) to specify that the MI Report be submitted by the Supplier using an alternative communication to that specified in paragraph 4.1 above such as email. The Supplier agrees to comply with any such instructions provided they do not materially increase the burden on the Supplier.

  • Final Completion The full and final completion of all Work in accordance with the Contract Documents.

  • Financial Conditions (a) The Recipient shall maintain or cause to be maintained records and accounts adequate to reflect in accordance with sound accounting practices the operations, resources and expenditures in respect of the Project of the departments or agencies of the Recipient responsible for carrying out the Project or any part thereof. (b) The Recipient shall: (i) have the records and accounts referred to in paragraph (a) of this Section including those for the Special Account for each fiscal year audited, in accordance with appropriate auditing principles consistently applied, by independent auditors acceptable to the Bank; (ii) furnish to the Bank as soon as available, but in any case not later than six months after the end of each such year, the report of such audit by said auditors, of such scope and in such detail as the Bank shall have reasonably requested; and (iii) furnish to the Bank such other information concerning said records and accounts and the audit thereof as the Bank shall from time to time reasonably request. (c) For all expenditures with respect to which withdrawals from the GEF Trust Fund Grant Account were made on the basis of statements of expenditure, the Recipient shall: (i) maintain or cause to be maintained, in accordance with paragraph (a) of this Section, records and accounts reflecting such expenditures; (ii) retain, until at least one year after the Bank has received the audit report for the fiscal year in which the last withdrawal from the GEF Trust Fund Grant Account was made, all records (contracts, orders, invoices, bills, receipts and other documents) evidencing such expenditures; (iii) enable the Bank’s representatives to examine such records; and (iv) ensure that such records and accounts are included in the annual audit referred to in paragraph (b) of this Section and that the report of such audit contains a separate opinion by said auditors as to whether the statements of expenditure submitted during such fiscal year, together with the procedures and internal controls involved in their preparation, can be relied upon to support the related withdrawals.

  • SPECIAL CONDITIONS A submitted appeal must;

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!