Final Conclusion. 48. If due to force majeure will not be possible to perform by the Seller contract in accordance with the contract, he is entitled to defer the delivery date until the cessation of force majeure and its consequences, and if you can not identify the obstacles arising from the completion of the Seller shall be entitled to a partial or total withdrawal to the agreement without the ensuing further obligations to the Purchaser. The postponement of delivery and partial or complete waiver by the Seller of the agreement does not create a basis for any claims by the Purchaser, including compensation.
Final Conclusion. 1) Contracting parties declare that all legal relations arising from this Contract are governed by Czech law, in particular the Civil Code, and further declare that the Agreement is not concluded in violation of good morals, which they confirm with their signatures
Final Conclusion. Thanks to the differentiated and comparative analysis of the responses of the two groups of professionals, we could identify which are the most important knowledge that the responsible person - IMS Manager / Responsible for the IMS – needs to possess to design, implement and maintain an INTEGRATED SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (IMS) in a furniture manufacturing SME. EASIMS will put efforts on developing training content in the field of process management, since this field has been valued as the most important (high level - very high) by experienced professionals and in which not-experienced professionals admit having a medium - low knowledge. Meaning that this area is highly needed and there is a training gap. Moreover, we have to remind that for this area of process management very little or almost no training offer is available and accessible. According to experienced professionals, knowledge in standard requirements is highly important, although less than in process management and the related training offer is rich. Therefore, EASIMS will not develop training content for this area, although, reference will be made to existing and available ones. In relation to software for the IMS management, the importance of having knowledge is lower than in the rest of the aspects assessed, although the level of knowledge is low - very low. Therefore, EASIMS will cover also this aspect, but with less depth than process management. Annex 1 includes the survey that the experts have responded. Annex 2 includes the detailed survey results.
Final Conclusion. In summary, the four participating institutions, University College of Southeastern Norway (HSN), Stord/Haugesund University College (HSH), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), and UiT - The Arctic University of Norway (UiT) have proposed to create a joint PhD- program incorporating a well-composed course structure and with sufficient scientific breadth to have the potential to become internationally strong. The committee assesses that the institutions have satisfactorily complemented their application by responding to comments on criteria that must be satisfied. The committee also acknowledges that the institutions have satisfactorily responded to comments on criteria that should be satisfied. Based on the written application with attached documentation elucidated at the on-site interviews, and the response from the institution after the first version of the report, the expert committee concludes the following: The committee recommends accreditation of the PhD programme in Nautical Operations: Joint Degree at University College of Southeast Norway (HSN), Stord/Haugesund University College (HSH), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and UiT- The arctic University of Norway (UiT). 7 Decision The PhD program in Nautical Operations- Joint degree fulfils all criteria for accreditation as detailed in Chapter 7 §§7.1 - 7.4 of Regulations concerning supervision of the educational quality in higher education (Academic Supervision Regulations) of 28. February 2013. The PhD program in Nautical Operations- Joint Degree is accredited. 8 Presentation of the expert committee Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx University, Finland Xxxxxx is Doctor of technology, Helsinki University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (1994). He is an experienced scientist and lecturer. He also has a technical background from the field as Project manager Xxxxxxxx Xxxx-Yards and Xxxx Finnyards/Xxxx Yards. From 2006 he is Professor of Safety of marine traffic and winter navigation safety, Helsinki University of Technology. He is the Head of the Mechanical Engineering study program in Aalto University, 2014-2015 and has participated in the coordination of the planning of a new master program for Applied Mechanics for Aalto University 2013-2015. He teaches all levels within subjects such as ship vibrations, winter navigation, vehicle engineering and safety of marine traffic. He currently supervises seven PhD students and has previously supervised 5...
Final Conclusion. Recently, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx gave a clear characterisation of biblical prophecy in relation to ancient Near Eastern prophecy: Das Eigentümliche der israelitisch-judäischen Prophetie (insbesondere der ‘Schriftprofeten’) ist m.E. ... in erster Linie ein redaktionelles Phänomen, das eine Welt überdeckt, die der altorientalischen ähnlicher gewesen ist als die und vorliegenden Texte suggerieren.7 The present study confirms this view. The main conclusion of this study is, that the earliest stages of the Isaiah tradition, i.e. the prophetic material from the eighth century and its earliest revision in the seventh century, to a great extent correspond with the prophetic material of seventh-century Assyria. Three aspects of comparison have been worked out:
