Formative Mid-Year Rating Sample Clauses

Formative Mid-Year Rating. 32 The evaluator will provide a formative mid-year rating to the teacher by January 31 for each 33 indicator and criterion the teacher is evaluated on that year. The evaluator will meet with any 34 teacher with scores of one (1) or (2) for any indicator or criterion by the last working day of 35 February. 36 37 C. Probation‌ 38
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Formative Mid-Year Rating. 32 The evaluator will provide a formative mid-year rating to the teacher by January 31 for each 33 indicator and criterion the teacher is evaluated on that year. The evaluator will meet with any 34 teacher with scores of one (1) or (2) for any indicator or criterion by the last working day of 35 February. 37 C. Probation 38 39 1. Anticipated Probation 40 41 In accordance with statute, a regular certificated contract Employee may be placed on probation 42 at any time after October 15. Where it is anticipated that a regular certificated contract Employee 43 may be placed on probation, a meeting will be held a minimum of three (3) weeks before the 44 onset of probation to notify the Employee and to call attention to deficiencies. A written 45 summary of the deficiencies shall be given to the Employee at that meeting.

Related to Formative Mid-Year Rating

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • Level IV a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the disposition of his/her grievance at Level III, he/she may file the grievance within five (5) days of the Level III response for transmittal to the Board.

  • Level I If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the supervisor shall give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after receipt of the written grievance.

  • Level III In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level II, the decision rendered may be appealed to the School Board, provided such an appeal is made in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of the decision in Level II. If a grievance is properly appealed to the School Board, the School District shall hear the grievance within twenty (20) days after the receipt of the appeal. Within twenty (20) days after the meeting the School Board shall issue its decision in writing to the parties involved. At the option of the School Board, a committee or representative(s) of the School District may be designated by the School Board to hear the appeal at this level, and report its findings and recommendations to the School District. The School District shall then render its decision.

  • Insurance Company Rating The required insurance must be written by a company approved to do business in the State or Texas with a financial standing of at least an A- rating, as reflected in Best’s insurance ratings or by a similar rating system recognized within the insurance industry at the time the policy is issued.

  • PRIORITY RATING If so identified, this Contract is a "rated order" certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and SELLER shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocation System Regulation (15 C.F.R. Part 700).

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.