Historic Context a. Include those historic contexts developed to evaluate the properties evaluated in the HASR that are not eligible for the NRHP.
Historic Context. Conduct background research to identify meaningful historic contexts or verify the lack of meaningful historic associations (i.e., those that may render the properties eligible to the NRHP). If historic associations are identified, the refuse deposits do not qualify for this protocol. As part of background research, review available: atlases (e.g., cut-over atlases, timber sale atlases, etc.); planting records, range condition inventories, and other records; historic maps; historic photographs; ethnographies, oral histories; and standard historical references. Incorporate brief narratives of results of background research into site records.
2.1 Isolated historic refuse deposits lack integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and, most importantly, association. Isolated historic refuse deposits are disassociated from their sources and thus from their historic contexts. They are ineligible for the NRHP.
2.2 The waste in isolated historic refuse deposits has been removed from its source and may be mixed with other deposits. Isolated historic refuse deposits are not associated with adjacent or nearby eligible properties for which historic contexts are or can be established. They represent variable and idiosyncratic behavior by unknown persons or groups. Without historic contexts, isolated trash dumps do not contribute to property significance.
(a) Isolated historic refuse deposits may be associated with roads (see 2.2(b), below). This protocol does not apply if these deposits are associated with other types of historic properties.
(b) The exception for integrity of association is that for roads, and particularly road use. Many refuse deposits are found at the ends of or adjacent to roads. In most cases, the only association is that for road use; the roads were used to access generally remote areas in order to dump trash well removed from the sources of the trash. The roads themselves may have been originally built long before their use to dump trash, or reengineered many times since original construction and subsequent use for dumping trash, or only be incidental to the use for dumping trash. HPM/DHPS need to apply professional judgment to determine if shared relationships exist between trash dumps and historic roads that together may otherwise make refuse deposits eligible to the NRHP.
Historic Context. FEMA will develop a Historic Context statement for New Orleans public schools constructed before 1964, in consultation with SHPO, to guide its evaluation of school facilities directly affected by the implementation of Phase I of the Master Plan. FEMA will also review existing archaeological site information; the Revised Archeological Probability Zone Map for Orleans Parish of September 24, 2008, included as Appendix B, or any update of this map; and historic maps for all
Historic Context. The relationship between the EU and MERCOSUR started immediately after the Mercosur’s constitution in 1991. The EU looked for an interregional group approach with Mercosur. This was the perfect occasion for ‘the EU to export its regional governance model and to increase its reputation as an international actor’24. Furthermore, this dialogue was intensified as a reaction to the US project of Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) initiated in 199425. The idea behind was a clear expansion of the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) to Central and South America. The EU leaders feared that FTAA had the same repercussions of Mexico’s membership to NAFTA regarding the trade with the EU. ‘The European companies lost about half of the Mexican market’26 when it join NAFTA and as a consequence ‘the EU's participation in Mexico's trade reached its lowest point in 1996 to an amount of only 6.1%’27. This
Historic Context. The historic context should be a major component of the project effort, and will serve as the basis for making eligibility recommendations and determinations. Contexts for the region, local area, and individual mines will be prepared unless a regional context addressing these items has already been produced. In many cases (i.e. the Oquirrhs, Park City) adequate contexts have been produced, at least at a regional level, and do not need to be replicated. Consultant must examine previous cultural reports commissioned by the AMRP located in the DOGM Public Information Center files. Consultant will identify, study, and cite all existing contexts utilized in the report. If a regional context specific to mining in that area or district has not been produced, Consultant must write one. At a minimum, these resources should be consulted for context documentation: U.S. and Utah Geological Survey reports and other geological reports, files from the Special Collections at the University of Utah and the Utah State Historical Society, local historic societies and publications, and the index to the Salt Lake Mining Review. Contexts should be written so that they can stand alone, independent of the rest of the report. The AMRP may extract the contexts for publication. They should focus on the mining district within which the project is located, but should not contain sensitive or privileged information that cannot be released to the public.
