In-Licensed Patents Sample Clauses

In-Licensed Patents. If there are at any time any Licensed Patents and/or Post-Sublicensing Licensed Patents that are in-licensed by Xencor instead of owned by Xencor (or any Xencor Affiliate), then Section 6.2(a) (as applicable) shall apply to the prosecution of such Licensed Patents and/or Post-Sublicensing Licensed Patents in the same way as if they were Licensed Patents and/or Post-Sublicensing Licensed Patents owned by Xencor, to the full extent Xencor has prosecution rights under the agreement by which Xencor (or the Xencor Affiliate) received its license rights to such Patents, and to the full extent permitted by such agreement.
In-Licensed Patents. With respect to any aspect of the In-Licensed Patents for which Codexis has less than fully exclusive, worldwide rights (e.g., co-exclusive, non-exclusive, limited territorial or otherwise restricted rights), the licenses provided in Sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 and 3.5.6 shall be limited to the scope of those rights that Codexis Controls.
In-Licensed Patents. It is understood and agreed that, with respect to Patents within the Santarus Patents that are owned by a Third Party and licensed to Santarus, the provisions set forth in this Section 8.4 shall apply only to the extent consistent with Santarus’ rights under the applicable in-license for such Santarus Patents.
In-Licensed Patents. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 8.3 to the contrary, the Parties acknowledge that certain Genethon Background Patent Rights are in-licensed from Third Parties and consequently that the rights and obligations of the Parties set out in this Section 8.3 remain in any case subject to the terms of the license agreement with such Third Parties and to the legal rights of such Third Parties. As a consequence, neither Party shall be in breach of any of its obligations under this Section 8.3 to the extent it is unable to comply with such obligation as a consequence of the legal rights of the Third Party licensor under the applicable license agreement.
In-Licensed Patents. With regard to any Subject AnaptysBio Patent licensed to Client pursuant to Section 4.3(a) that is licensed to AnaptysBio by [*]. Subject to mutual execution by the parties of a sublicense agreement with respect to an In-Licensed Patent, AnaptysBio shall be responsible for any payments that may be due to Licensor(s) as a result of Client’s practice of the invention(s) claimed by such In-Licensed Patent within the scope of such sublicense.
In-Licensed Patents. With respect to this Section 8, “Protalix Patent Rights” shall include Patent Rights that are Controlled by Protalix or any of its Affiliates pursuant to a Third Party License (i.e., such Patent Rights are not owned by Protalix or any of its Affiliates) only if [***]
In-Licensed Patents. With respect to any Licensed Patent that is licensed to Tarsus from a Third Party, to the extent Tarsus has the right to do so, Tarsus will cooperate with Lian to enforce, such Licensed Patents in the Field and in the Territory in the same manner as set forth in this Section 14.2. As between Tarsus and Lian, any recoveries from enforcement of such Licensed Patents owned by a Third Party shall be shared in accordance with Section 14.2.4, after deducting from such recoveries any amounts owed to the Third Party licensor for such enforcement.
In-Licensed Patents. (a) Pharmstandard acknowledges that: (i) pursuant to Section 6.2(a) of the KHK Agreement, KHK shall have the first right and responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Listed AVEO Patents and any other Licensed Patents that fall within the definition of Kirin Product Invention Patents (as defined in the KHK Agreement) on a worldwide basis, with AVEO having step-in (ii) pursuant to Section 6.2(c) of the KHK Agreement, KHK shall have the first right and responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of any Licensed Patents that fall within the definition of Jointly Owned Product Patents (as defined in the KHK Agreement) in the KHK Territory, and, as between KHK and AVEO, AVEO shall have the first right and responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Licensed Patents in the Pharmstandard Territory, subject to (A) keeping the other party reasonably informed with respect to such activities, consulting with the other party on such matters (including with respect to final abandonment of any claims), and reasonably considering the other party’s comments, (B) reasonable cooperation and mutual agreement on (and sharing costs equally with respect to) filings that are applicable to both the KHK Territory and the Pharmstandard Territory, and (C) the other party having the right to step-in on prosecution and maintenance if the original prosecuting party determines to abandon or not maintain any such Licensed Patent in the would-be-abandoning party’s territory; (iii) pursuant to Section 6.2(d) of the KHK Agreement, KHK and AVEO have agreed to confer and agree upon which party shall prosecute and/or maintain any Joint Other Invention Patent (as defined in the KHK Agreement). AVEO shall not undertake such conference or agreement with KHK with respect to any Licensed Patent without the Parties’ mutual agreement (which agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed by either Party); (iv) if AVEO or Pharmstandard, as applicable, does not bring action to prevent or xxxxx Competitive Infringement of any Licensed Patents within [**] days (or [**] days in the case of an action brought under the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act or any ex-U.S. equivalent of the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act recognized by Applicable Law) after notification thereof to or by such Party pursuant to Section 5.4(a) above, then KHK shall have a back-up right under Section 6.5(b)(ii) of the KHK Agreement to bring, at its own expense, an appropriate action in the Pharm...
In-Licensed Patents. If there are at any time any Aveo Patents that are in-licensed by Aveo instead of owned by Aveo (or an Aveo Affiliate), then Section 6.2(b) shall apply to the prosecution of such Patents in the same way as if they were Aveo Patents owned by Aveo, to the full extent Aveo has prosecution rights under the agreement by which Aveo received its license rights to such Aveo Patents that are in-licensed by Aveo instead of owned by Aveo (or an Aveo Affiliate), and to the full extent permitted by such agreement. If there are at any time any Listed Kirin Patents or Kirin Product Invention Patents that are in-licensed by Kirin instead of owned by Kirin (or any Kirin Affiliate), then Section 6.2(a) shall apply to the prosecution of such Patents in the same way as if they were Listed Kirin Patents or Kirin Product Invention Patents owned by Kirin, to the full extent Kirin has prosecution rights under the agreement by which Kirin received its license rights to such Patents that are in-licensed by Kirin instead of owned by Kirin (or any Kirin Affiliate), and to the full extent permitted by such agreement.

Related to In-Licensed Patents

  • Licensed Patents Licensee shall be responsible for all further patent prosecution with respect to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technologies set out in Exhibit “A”. Licensee may select the patent agent for the prosecution of the Licensed Patents, subject to the approval of Licensor as the patent owner, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Licensee shall provide Licensor with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Licensed Patents so that Licensor may be informed and apprised of and meaningfully consulted as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall keep all such documentation confidential. In the event the Licensee does not agree that any given patent application or patent should be filed, prosecuted or maintained (hereinafter referred to as a “Refused Licensed Patent”) in a particular jurisdiction(s) Licensee shall indicate such disagreement in writing (hereinafter “Refusal Notice”) and upon Licensor’s receipt of such Refusal Notice Licensor shall have the right unilaterally to make, prosecute and maintain such Refused Licensed * Confidential Information, indicated by [***], has been omitted from this filing and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission Patent in such jurisdiction(s) in the name of its owners, at Licensor’s expense, and Licensee shall not have any rights or obligations to such Refused Licensed Patent in such jurisdiction(s); provided, however, that Licensee shall retain all of its ownership rights in any Refused Licensed Patent that is a Co-Owned Technology. In such case Licensor shall provide Licensee with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Refused Licensed Patents so that Licensee may be informed and apprised of and be meaningfully consulted with as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall have no obligation to continue prosecution or maintenance of any Refused Licensed Patent and may abandon same without any prior notice or any obligation to Licensee. Both Licensee and Licensor shall make best efforts to respond promptly to any request from the other Party for input or assistance with respect to matters pertaining to the Licensed Patents. Licensee shall use reasonable efforts to amend any patent application to include claims reasonably requested by the other Party and required to protect the Licensed Technology. In addition to Licensee’s obligations pursuant to section 4.1 above, Licensee shall be solely responsible for all patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) from the Effective Date onward, including all costs relating to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to the new patent agents selected by Licensee and approved by Licensor. For any patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) paid by Licensor after the Effective Date (including, without limitation, those expenses related to patentability assessments and drafting, filing, prosecution, maintenance, and taxes (the “Patent Costs”)), Licensee shall promptly reimburse Licensor for such Patent Costs upon receipt of an invoice from Licensor for such expenses. For any work in progress with respect to the Licensed Patents for which the Patent Costs have not already been paid by Licensor to its patent firm prior to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to Licensee’s patent agent, Licensor will direct its patent firm to copy Licensee on all such invoices from said patent firm and Licensee will promptly pay said invoices directly to Licensor’s patent firm.

  • Third Party Patent Rights If either Party desires to bring an opposition, action for declaratory judgment, nullity action, interference, declaration for non-infringement, reexamination or other attack upon the validity, title or enforceability of a Patent Right owned or controlled by a Third Party and having one or more claims that Cover the Compound or Product, or the use, sale, offer for sale or importation of the Compound or Product (except insofar as such action is a counterclaim to or defense of, or accompanies a defense of, a Third Party’s claim or assertion of infringement under Section 7.6, in which case the provisions of Section 7.6 shall govern), such Party shall so notify the other Party and the Parties shall promptly confer to determine whether to bring such action or the manner in which to settle such action. Provention shall have the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to bring, at its own expense and in its sole control, such action in the Territory. If Provention does not bring such an action in the Territory, within ninety (90) days of notification thereof pursuant to this Section 7.7(a) (or earlier, if required by the nature of the proceeding), MacroGenics shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring, at MacroGenics’ own expense, such action. The Party not bringing an action under this Section 7.7(a) shall be entitled to separate representation in such proceeding by counsel of its own choice and at its own expense, and shall cooperate fully with the Party bringing such action. Any awards or amounts received in bringing any such action shall be first allocated to reimburse the initiating Party’s expenses in such action, and any remaining amounts shall be allocated between the Parties as provided in Section 7.5(e).