Incorporate Relevant Site-Specific Recommendations Sample Clauses

Incorporate Relevant Site-Specific Recommendations. After Task 5.1 is complete and the City has selected the appropriate mitigation strategy at each affected well site, additional site improvements relevant to each affected well site will be considered for incorporation. For example, additional site-specific recommendations from the Water Master Plan or project needs identified by City staff such as upgrades to obsolete electrical and instrumentation equipment or flood proofing at high flood-risk sites can be identified and prioritized with input by City staff for incorporation into the improvements scope. Task 5.3 Confirm Design Criteria Assumptions After Task 5.2 is complete, design criteria developed for treatment and site improvements will be confirmed and documented. Categories of design criteria to be developed for each well include: • Treatment and blending goal • Type and rating for outdoor vs indoor equipment • Operational redundancy required • Equipment design useful life or remaining useful life (for existing equipment) • Operational flexibility and contingency planning • Chemical consumption, storage and delivery • Treatment backwash sizing criteria • Chlorine gas safety Task 5.1-5.3 Assumptions • Level of design criteria to be developed for each site is intended to provide sufficient level of detail for the City to decide on the recommended alternative, final facility configuration, and major components for improvements. Once the City has reviewed and made these decisions, the basis of design will be documented in two deliverables to avoid changes in concept, configuration, and design criteria during Phase 2 Final Design. Task 5.1-5.3 Deliverables • Basis of Design Report for Cr6 Mitigation, Draft and Final, in PDF. • Basis of Design Report for Site Improvements, Draft and Final, in PDF. TASK 6 – PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT, FIGURES AND COST ESTIMATE Task 6.1 Preliminary Design Report This task is to prepare a new, updated Preliminary Design Report (PDR) following the general outline of the June 2016 Draft PDR. For each affected well site, the following discussions and recommendations will be summarized: • Existing facilities on site • Conceptual treatment and/or blending facilities layout alternatives with figures and a description of recommended equipment and facility upgrades • Recommended design criteria • Discussion of facility hydraulics • Discussion of backwash waste system alternatives and recommendations, if applicable • Summary of power supply and control recommendations for new equipme...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Incorporate Relevant Site-Specific Recommendations

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By February 1, 2018, the District will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the District to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the District, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternates are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the District’s online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor, or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the District will officially adopt, and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Audit of Existing Content and Functionality By September 1, 2017, the Recipient will propose for OCR’s review and approval the identity and bona fides of an Auditor (corporation or individual) to audit all content and functionality on its website, including, but not limited to, the home page, all subordinate pages, and intranet pages and sites, to identify any online content or functionality that is inaccessible to persons with disabilities, including online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third party vendor or an open source. The Auditor will have sufficient knowledge and experience in website accessibility for people with disabilities to carry out all related tasks, including developing a Proposed Corrective Action Plan. The Audit will use the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set out above, unless the Recipient receives prior permission from OCR to use a different standard as a benchmark. During the Audit, the Recipient will also seek input from members of the public with disabilities, including parents, students, employees, and others associated with the Recipient, and other persons knowledgeable about website accessibility, regarding the accessibility of its online content and functionality.

  • DAF Specifications Developer shall submit initial specifications for the DAF, including System Protection Facilities, to Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO at least one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Initial Synchronization Date; and final specifications for review and comment at least ninety (90) Calendar Days prior to the Initial Synchronization Date. Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO shall review such specifications to ensure that the DAF are compatible with the technical specifications, operational control, and safety requirements of the Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO and comment on such specifications within thirty (30) Calendar Days of Developer’s submission. All specifications provided hereunder shall be deemed to be Confidential Information.

  • General specifications For the purpose of this Regulation, the vehicle shall fulfil the following requirements:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!