Task 6. Provide operational and training liaison with other State and local Fusion Centers.
Task 6. PRINTED WIRING BOARD (PWB)
Task 6. Meetings/Public Hearings/Coordination with Stakeholders: It is anticipated that the following meetings would occur with implementation of the CEQA scope of work: one (1) project initiation meeting, one (1) scoping meeting with City staff, applicant, and residents, two (2) project status/update meetings, one (1) Planning Commission Public Hearing, one (1) City Council public hearing and coordination with the Los Angeles Conservancy. Representative(s) from the Consultant will attend the following meetings as needed in addition to the project initiation meeting described above. Consultant will attend any additional meetings at the City’s request. Consultant will provide notes of comments received at the public hearing or board meeting.
Examples of Task 6 in a sentence
Task Total Task 1 – Project Management $9,480 Task 2 – Alignment Study $7,590 Task 3.1 – 60% Design $18,560 Task 3.2 – 90% Design $10,400 Task Total Task 3.3 – 100% Design $5,335 Task 4 – Permitting $2,790 Task 5 – Bid Services $3,090 Task 6 – Construction Admin $6,270 Total Budget $63,515 EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS The following items are exclusions and conditions specific to this Scope of Services.
Task Expected Start from NTP Estimated Days to Complete Task 1 – Project Management – – Task 2 – Alignment Study 5 30 Task 3.1 – 60% Design 49 45 Task 3.2 – 90% Design 108 30 Task 3.3 – 100% Design 152 14 Task 4 – Permitting 138 45 Task 5 – Bid Services 183 TBD Task 6 – Construction Administration XXX XXX The schedule includes 14-day review period for the City for each submittal.
More Definitions of Task 6
Task 6. Working Session – Draft Expanded Table of Contents Conduct a working session (by telephone or web-based meeting software) with Airport management to review draft expanded Minimum Standards and Rules and Regulations table of contents and provide comments, identify questions, and make recommendations. Task 7: First Draft Develop and provide for review (e.g., airport management and staff) first draft of the Minimum Standards and Rules and Regulations based on the information collected, reviewed, and analyzed in Task 2 and Task 3, the first site visit conducted in Task 4, the draft expanded Minimum Standards and Rules and Regulations table of contents developed in Task 5, and the comments provided, questions identified, and recommendations made during Task 6. The first draft of the Minimum Standards and Rules and Regulations will be appropriate, reasonable, and relevant for the Airports, markets, and activities occurring (or reasonably anticipated to occur) at the Airports and consistent and compliant with the: ⮚ Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Sponsor Assurances (dated February 2020) and ⮚ consistent with all other applicable FAA compliance-related directives including: o Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5100-16A (AIP, Grant Assurance Number One – General Federal Requirements) o AC 150/5150-2B (Federal Surplus Personal Property for Public Airport Purposes) o AC 150/5190-6 (Exclusive Rights at Federally Obligated Airports) o AC 150/5190-7 (Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities) o Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, FAA Order 5100.38A (Airport Improvement Program Handbook) o Order 5190.6B (Airports Compliance Manual) In addition to being clear, concise, and well organized, the Minimum Standards and the Rules and Regulations will complement (not duplicate) the other governing documents for the Airports and other legal requirements. AMCG proposes that the Minimum Standards and the Rules and regulations be a separate (standalone) document (i.e., the documents will not be combined with other documents or consolidated). To ensure that Minimum Standards are relevant, reasonable, and appropriate for the Airports, the market, and the activities, AMCG utilizes a comprehensive approach that will consider the: (1) commercial aeronautical activities occurring at the Airports (including the land and improvements being leased/used, the type, level, and quality of aeronautical products, services, and facilities being provide...
Task 6. Bidding Support Services: Note: This scope assumes that the recycled water line will be constructed concurrently with the water and storm drain lines. Additional effort and associated fees will be required if the recycled water line is constructed as a separate project by a different contractor on a different schedule. City will be responsible for advertisement for bid of the project. Consultant shall assist City during bid solicitation process. Consultant shall provide bid phase services, as requested by the City through award of the construction contract including the following; response to bidders’ inquiries, preparation of addenda, and review and evaluation of bids. Upon completion of bidding, consultant shall prepare a “Conformed” package of plans and specifications revised to incorporate all addenda ready to issue for contract award and construction. Consultant shall submit one (1) signed conformed set of contract documents hard copies copy on bond paper and one electronic copy on CD or DVD in AutoCAD 2014 or later version, MS Word and PDF formats. This scope of work assumes that the conformed set already being prepared as part of the Xxxxxxx Sewer Improvements Project is augmented for the Recycled Water Pipeline Extension.
Task 6. County Sign-Off (Week 11) Activities: Contractor shall facilitate the production review call to ensure everything is configured according to the County’s needs. County Acceptance: Prior year account values in all documents are accurate and new structure is approved.
Task 6. Reporting (Old St. Hilary’s Open Space Preserve):
Task 6. TARGETED USE CASE ANALYSIS [ITERATIVE TASK] The goal of this task is to perform risk and performance assessment of the target Use Cases in industrial and a power generation application (real or as designed) given the data, models, and insights from previous tasks. This will include critical components starting from the injection point to end use equipment, and as such it would also include portions of gas network pipeline and components. The analysis is intended to inform the owners of the Use Cases what are the associated risk for various scenarios of blending, what part(s) of the system should be replaced/upgraded, what modifications are needed for daily operation and integrity management practices, associated costs, and other factors critical to technical and economic decisions regarding hydrogen blending. This is an iterative task, as that the same target systems are subject of the preliminary assessments in previous tasks, updated as needed in this task. Task 6 tightly is linked to the system integrity management and techno-economic analyses in Task 7. The Recipient shall: • Conduct risk and performance assessment of the Industrial Use Case • Conduct risk and performance assessment of the Power Generation Use Case. • Produce QRA results and qualitative insights, as well as comprehensive integrity management approach for the above Use Cases to convert certain segments of the existing system for various concentrations of blended hydrogen and pure hydrogen.
Task 6. DETERMINE THE NEED FOR “CREDITS” Description: There are two types of “credits,” each with specific and distinct characteristics, which should be considered as part of this analysis. The first is a credit due to possible “double-payment” situations. These could occur when future contributions are made by the property owner toward the capital costs of the public facility covered by the development fee. Per state law, TischlerBise will forecast revenues other than development fees generated by new service units, such as state-shared revenue, highway user revenue, federal revenue, ad valorem property taxes, construction contracting, or similar excise taxes and the capital recovery portion of utility fees attributable to development based on the approved land use assumptions. The second is a credit toward the payment of a development fee for the required dedication of public sites and improvements provided by the developer and for which the development fee is imposed. Both types of credits will be addressed in the calculation of development fees. Meetings: Conference calls as necessary. Deliverables: See Task 7.