INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLUTION Sample Clauses

INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLUTION. During the pendency of the dispute resolution procedures described herein, DOC and DOE will ensure that services required to provide a free appropriate public education (FAPE) will continue. Disputed service(s) currently being provided will continue until the outcome of the dispute resolution process. The implementation of disputed service(s) not previously provided will be pursuant to a decision through the described resolution process. All attempts will be made to resolve disputes at the lowest possible level. When disputes cannot be resolved by designated department representatives, a written explanation of the dispute will be sent to the DOE Director of Special Education Programs and the DOC Educational Services Coordinator. These individuals, in consultation with each other, shall review the issues and make a determination as to how the dispute should be resolved. The decision will be shared in writing with each level involved within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of request for the determination and will include reasons for the decision. If they are unable to reach resolution, they will refer the issue to the Secretary of the Department of Education and the Secretary of the Department of Corrections. If a resolution is not obtained by the Director of Special Education Programs and DOC Educational Services Coordinator, the Secretary of the Department of Education and the Secretary of the Department of Corrections will jointly make a final determination within thirty
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLUTION. If a dispute arises between the local EI program and the LEA program regarding any matter that cannot be addressed through open communication and dialogue among the parties involved, the local EI program director and the appropriate LEA supervisor shall intervene. If all local efforts are unsuccessful, the BWEIP manager and the USBE preschool coordinator must be consulted. If the matter involves the USDB/PIP program(s), a representative from that program must be consulted. If resolution at this level cannot be reached, the Procedure for Use of the Dispute Resolution Board shall be initiated.
Sample 1
INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLUTION. When disputes arise between the parties that cannot be resolved through other means, the resolution process described herein will be available. During the pendency of the dispute resolution procedures, the parties will ensure that services, including disputed services, required to provide free appropriate public education (FAPE) will continue.
Sample 1
INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLUTION. If a dispute arises between the local EI program and USDB regarding any matter that cannot be addressed through open communication and dialogue among the parties involved, the local EI program director and the USDB supervisor shall intervene. If all local efforts are unsuccessful, the BWEIP Program Manager and the USDB Superintendent must be consulted. If resolution at this level cannot be reached, the Procedure for Use of the Dispute Resolution Board shall be initiated.
Sample 1
INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLUTION. It is the intent of IRC and the SELPA that all disputes be resolved at the lowest administrative level possible. A process will be followed if a dispute and impasse* arises (*the 60 day calendar day timeline begins on the date both agencies agree the issue has reached an impasse) between the SELPA and IRC as to: the eligibility of the infant; which agency is responsible for the infant and family evaluation and assessment, service coordinator, and the development and implementation of the IFSP; and which agency is responsible for the provision/purchase of appropriate early intervention services.
Sample 1
INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLUTION. TCRC and SBCSELPA agree to work cooperatively to minimize interagency disputes and, when such disputes occur, both agencies will seek a speedy resolution. Local disputes that may occur between TCRC and SBCSELPA are defined below:
Sample 1

Related to INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLUTION

  • I2 Dispute Resolution I2.1 The Parties shall attempt in good faith to negotiate a settlement to any dispute between them arising out of or in connection with the Contract within twenty (20) Working Days of either Party notifying the other of the dispute and such efforts shall involve the escalation of the dispute to the finance director of the Contractor and the commercial director of the Authority.

  • Dispute Resolution Procedures (a) In the event a dispute arises about the interpretation, application, calculation of Loss, or calculation of payments or otherwise with respect to this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item”), then the Receiver and the Assuming Institution shall make every attempt in good faith to resolve such items within sixty (60) days following the receipt of a written description of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item, with notification of the possibility of taking the matter to arbitration (the date on which such 60-day period expires, or any extension of such period as the parties hereto may mutually agree to in writing, herein called the “Resolution Deadline Date”). If the Receiver and the Assuming Institution resolve all such items to their mutual satisfaction by the Resolution Deadline Date, then within thirty (30) days following such resolution, any payment due as a result of such resolution shall be made arising from the settlement of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute.

  • Dispute Resolution Procedure 21.1 All disputes or grievances arising between the Parties shall as far as practical be resolved at the workplace level through consultation. Accordingly the following procedure must be followed:

  • Dispute Resolution All or any disputes arising out or touching upon or in relation to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including the interpretation and validity of the terms thereof and the respective rights and obligations of the Parties, shall be settled amicably by mutual discussion, failing which the same shall be settled through the adjudicating officer appointed under the Act.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Prior to the initiation of formal dispute resolution procedures, the Parties shall first attempt to resolve their Dispute informally, in a timely and cost-effective manner, as follows:

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Process 1. In the event there is a dispute under this Centralized Contract, the Contractor, OGS and Authorized User agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The Contractor, OGS and Authorized User shall, without delay, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Centralized Contract which are not affected by the dispute. Primary responsibility for resolving any dispute arising under this Centralized Contract shall rest with the Authorized User’s Contractor Coordinators and the Contractor’s Account Executive and the State & Local Government Regional General Manager.

  • CENTRAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to disputes and grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Board Collective Bargaining Act, 2014 central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply. In the event that central language is being grieved locally, the local parties shall provide the grievance to their respective central agents.

  • Formal Dispute Resolution 10.6.1 If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute through the informal procedure described in Section 10.5, then either Party may invoke the formal Dispute Resolution procedures described in this Section 10.6. Unless agreed among all Parties, formal Dispute Resolution procedures, including arbitration or other procedures as appropriate, may be invoked not earlier than sixty (60) calendar days after receipt of the letter initiating Dispute Resolution under Section 10.3.

  • Dispute Resolution Process Any claim, dispute or other matter in question not resolved by the process identified in Paragraph

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Prior to filing of litigation, the parties may select non-binding mediation as a method of conflict resolution for issues arising out of or relating to this procurement process or any contract resulting from or any contemplated transaction. The parties agree that if non-binding mediation is chosen as a resolution process, the parties must agree to the chosen mediator(s) and that all mediation venue shall be at a location in Xxx Xxxxx County, Texas or agreed by the parties. The parties agree to share equally the cost of the mediation process and venue cost.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.