Evaluation and Assessment. 10.1.1. All children and youth referred for services will have received a thorough clinical assessment performed by the CONTRACTOR. This assessment will serve as the basis of the treatment and service plan as developed by the CONTRACTOR.
10.1.2. An assessment of the child or youth must be conducted in compliance with the requirements established in the Mental Health Plan (MHP) contract between COUNTY and DHCS, a copy of which will be provided to the CONTRACTOR under separate cover.
10.1.3. Children and youth must be active Medi-Cal recipients, with the exception of children and youth referred due to their status in the Child Welfare system, and those children identified by the COUNTY as to be served via the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) program. The children and youth served due to their status in the Child Welfare system will be referred by the Child Welfare social worker but must meet medical necessity to receive treatment. COUNTY shall verify Medi-Cal eligibility prior to commencement of services. CONTRACTOR shall verify that the child/youth continues to be an active Medi-Cal recipient throughout the course of services.
10.1.4. The assessment must establish medical necessity for the child or youth as defined in the California Code of Regulations, Title 9, which guides service and documentation provisions. Further, medical necessity must be maintained for all services provided, and for the timeframe in which the services were provided. Medical Necessity includes three elements: a covered DSM-5 diagnosis, significant impairment in an important area of life functioning or development, and an ability to benefit from the proposed specialty mental health intervention. The CONTRACTOR may use either its own assessment form or the COUNTY Biopsychosocial Assessment form, CARE 015.
10.1.5. A client plan must be developed and maintained for the child or youth that meets all client plan requirements established in the MHP. The CONTRACTOR may use either its own client plan form, if it has all the Medi-Cal required elements, or the COUNTY USP CARE 008 form. Individual client plans shall be developed no less than annually.
Evaluation and Assessment i. BSU and the County will regularly evaluate and assess the outcomes and impact of collaborative efforts.
ii. The Parties will engage in ongoing discussions to identify areas of improvement and further opportunities for collaboration.
Evaluation and Assessment. An evaluation plan has been developed to provide data which will identify student progress, be used as a part of the evaluation of the Charter School's effectiveness, and as the basis for continuous improvement of the school's program.
Evaluation and Assessment. The Provider agrees to provide ISD with copies of any evaluation or assessment results for any ISD dual-enrolled students served by Provider subject to this Contract or for any classroom-based evaluation or assessment for a class that includes ISD dual-enrolled students. The Provider further agrees ISD shall have the right to conduct assessments of all dual-enrolled students provided educational services under this Contract; and Provider shall fully cooperate with any assessments conducted by ISD.
Evaluation and Assessment. Grantor will utilize tools to evaluate all clients receiving advising services. Participation in any program impact reviews and assessments will be directed by the Grantor. Grantee shall maintain records of client activities through the Center IC for compilation and submission to
Evaluation and Assessment. Using evaluation, applied technology and program performance measurement, we will assess the situation, determine benchmarks for each project, and offer testing and training to validate current procedures and processes and recommend change solutions based on outcomes. Assessment is key to an effective and comprehensive Project Worksheet (PW) and results in successful project funding with FEMA. The purpose of Evaluation and Assessment is to observe and quantify your response and recovery expenses and confirm it is a result of the disaster and translate this into an appropriate Scope of Work for a PW. We will support the client to capture information as soon as possible and maintain this information throughout the life of the recovery effort. Program. Group Projects. Recent guidance promulgated by FEMA instructs project specialists to formulate projects by “logically grouping” work. In practice, this has resulted in large permanent work PWs grouping facilities without taking into consideration how an applicant does business. Xxxxxxx EMC believes that PWs formulated to align with the business process of the applicant lead to better recovery outcomes. Identify Opportunities for Hazard Mitigation. The Client may be given the opportunity to rebuild facilities and incorporate resiliency measures. Maximizing the amount of hazard mitigation funding the Client receives is a top priority for Xxxxxxx EMC. Our professionals have had success working with FEMA on broad cost-effective mitigation measures, resulting in HMGP funds that in some cases exceeded 100 percent of the repair cost eligible through the PA Program. We will achieve these results for the Client by making mitigation central to project development, accomplished by embedding hazard mitigation specialists to review PWs and ensure all possible opportunities to incorporate mitigation are maximized. Identify Alternative and Improved Projects. In most cases, the PA Program reimburses applicants for the completion of eligible permanent repair work on an actual cost basis. There are instances where applicants are reimbursed based on capped estimates, known as alternate projects, which require expertise in cost estimating. Implement the Alternative Procedures Pilot Program. SRIA created the Section 428 Alternative Procedures Pilot Program, which allows FEMA to make recovery grants for permanent work projects based on fixed cost estimates. Xxxxxxx EMC will support the Client to engage the Section 428 Alternative Pr...
Evaluation and Assessment. What types of evaluation will you use to determine if students have mastered the goals for the lesson?
Evaluation and Assessment. Both the face-to-face training and presentations available on the web programs will include an evaluation component to assess program effectiveness and to modify and enhance curriculum content to achieve project goals. A two-stage evaluation approach will be used to measure both knowledge and behavior changes of individuals participating in the program. Stage 1. A pre-/post-test evaluation strategy will be implemented at the beginning and end of both the face-to-face educational program and web-based training program. The pre-test will ask knowledge-based questions and post-test will measure the same knowledge-based questions to determine the knowledge increase of participants. In addition, the post- test will include 'satisfaction' questions and 'intentions to change or adopt' questions. Stage 2. A six-month follow-up assessment instrument will also be sent to participants via email to complete the assessment and ascertain what practices were actually adopted six months after participating in the program. Results will be summarized in a project final report. Briefs also may be developed to document and enhance the success of future riparian education and similar training programs. Figure 1. Initial Priority Watersheds Task 1 Project Administration Costs Federal $18,000 Non-Federal $12,000 Total $30,000 Objective Administer, coordinate and monitor all work performed under this project including technical and financial supervision and preparation of status and final reports.
Evaluation and Assessment. At the end of the internship, the internship supervisor evaluates the student’s competence development (based on interim evaluations if relevant) and informs the internship lecturer of their findings. In the evaluation of the internship, which remains the exclusive responsibility of HAN, the internship supervisor’s evaluation of the competence development is explicitly considered.
Evaluation and Assessment. All parties to this Agreement agree that all records pertaining to an infant/toddler’s evaluation and assessment will be maintained confidential and will not, directly or indirectly, be disclosed to any third party without authorization by the individual’s parent or guardian. Evaluation and Assessment will be provided by TLC (Whidbey Island and San Xxxx Islands) and Sherwood Community Services (Camano Island) to determine initial and continuing eligibility for IDEA Part C Early Intervention Services. Evaluations, assessments, and determinations of eligibility of services will be based on the ESIT Practice Guide for Evaluations, Assessments, Eligibility, and the Initial IFSP. Families will have the opportunity to identify their needs, concerns, priorities and resources related to enhancing the development of their child during the Initial Intake, Evaluation and Assessment, and throughout the program (i.e. home visits, IFSP Reviews). When the IFSP team discusses the child’s present levels of development as part of the annual IFSP review, they ensure the child’s continuing eligibility for Part C. A child must continue to meet Washington’s eligibility criteria in order to continue to receive Part C services. For those children who no longer exhibit a delay based on test scores alone, but for whom the team determines services continue to be needed, the team's informed clinical opinion may be used to continue Part C eligibility. If at any point during the provision of services, including at any periodic or annual IFSP review, the IFSP team, determines that the child may no longer be eligible for Part C services, the IFSP team must decide whether additional evaluations are warranted to establish continued eligibility. An evaluation is not required to determine ongoing eligibility. However, it is highly recommended to complete an evaluation in line with ESIT policies and procedures. If the parent declines to provide written consent for re-evaluation, the team may use information about current functioning, progress, outcome achievement, and other factors to determine the need for continued services. (Source: xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xx.xxx/sites/default/files/pdf/esit/2019-3EvalAssess-OngoingEligibility.pdf )
