Job Evaluation Appeal Process Sample Clauses

Job Evaluation Appeal Process if the incumbent employee is not satisfied with the evaluation results, the employee may request an on-site interview with the Director of DHR (or designee) to discuss and further clarify the job duties, or the employee may choose to appeal the classification decision. If an employee chooses to appeal the classification decision, they must notify the Director of DHR within ten (10) work days after receiving the evaluation results. A Job Analysis Review Board (JARB) shall be convened within fifteen (15) days of DHR receiving notice of an appeal. The JARB will consist of two (2) representatives from the CWA, two (2) administrators and one (1) representative from DHR. The JARB will be chaired by the DHR representative. The JARB is strictly advisory in nature. The JARB will review the process completed by DHR. The JARB shall be permitted to review written employee requests and accept input from the incumbent and his/her direct supervisor to help clarify the rationale for the incumbent’s request for his/her position to be reclassified. The JARB will conclude their review and submit a written recommendation to the Director of DHR within thirty (30) work days from the date convened. The final classification decision resides with the Director of DHR and will be concluded and communicated to appropriate parties within thirty (30) work days from receipt of the recommendations. The results of this appeal are final and are not grievable. Resulting pay adjustments, if applicable, will be processed the next full pay period, after the decision is made, and retroactive to January 31st of the year submitted.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Job Evaluation Appeal Process. 6.1 It is important that each party maintain accurate job ratings on an on-going basis. Failure to do so will serve to damage the integrity of the program.
Job Evaluation Appeal Process. 22.13 Incumbents who disagree with the evaluation results may make one request, in writing, for reconsideration as follows:

Related to Job Evaluation Appeal Process

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement which conform with and provide specificity to the statutory obligations established by Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.111 and § 3319.112.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.