Land Ownership. The Owner is the owner of the freehold of the Land and has an interest in the Land within the meaning of the term in Section 106(9)(b) of the 1990 Act
Land Ownership. (a) In accordance with the State Council Order No. 221 promulgated on 1 July 1997, after the training of the Shenzhen River, the boundary will follow the new centre line of the river. Regarding the “cross-boundary” land after the realignment of the Shenzhen River, the four sites originally within the administrative boundary of Shenzhen (i.e. sites A1 (i.e. the Loop), A2, A3 and A4 in the attached Plan 2) with an area of around 91 hectares, have since been included within the administrative boundary of the HKSAR. On the other hand, the 5 sites originally within the administrative boundary of the HKSAR (i.e. sites B1, B2, B3, B4 and B5 in the attached Plan 2) with an area of around 12 hectares, have since been included within the administrative boundary of Shenzhen.
(b) The Shenzhen side confirms that the HKSAR Government possesses in accordance with the law since 1 July 1997 the land ownership of sites A1 (i.e. the Loop), A2, A3 and A4 in the attached Plan 2. Likewise, the Hong Kong side confirms that the Shenzhen Municipal People’s Government possesses in accordance with the law since 1 July 1997 the land ownership of sites B1, B2, B3 and B4 in the attached Plan 2.
(c) Neither side is required to reimburse the other side for any of the land resumption compensation previously and respectively paid for the said “cross-boundary” land. To ensure that the “cross-boundary” land is not encumbered by land ownership problems in future land grants, each side shall take the responsibility for tackling and settling any land ownership problems or claims involving interests in their respective “cross-boundary” land arising before such land was included within the administrative boundary of the other side.
Land Ownership. For the avoidance of doubt the parties acknowledge and agree that there will be no change in land ownership in respect of this agreement, nor will the Licensee restrict the core functions or activities of the Licensor nor require the Licensor to take any action which would be beyond its statutory powers or in breach of government policy or government accounting procedures. The Licensee shall not create or permit any restriction to the use of the Lands by the Licensor its agents contractors and others authorised by the Licensor in connection with its forestry function.
Land Ownership. The HPT Staff identifies all landowners through resources available to them (e.g., AZSITE, ROW, county assessor maps) information provided by the Environmental Planner and project team. If any of the following entities own or manage land within the APE, the HPT Staff contacts them directly as they may have information regarding resources within their jurisdiction that is not available on AZSITE or other available tools: • Tribes • Individual National Forests • Military • City of Phoenix • City of Tucson • Salt River Project • Pima County • City of Scottsdale NOTE: ADOT has easement over federal lands, but does not typically own the ROW. It is advisable to double check underlying landownership status. While most agencies input data into AZSITE, a few agencies and Tribes maintain their own databases. A large portion of the ADOT ROW has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. Unless the areas have not been previously surveyed, the survey does not meet today’s standards, or the specific agency and Tribe has requested a site file search for their lands, a new records check is not completed. The HPT Portal Contacts page is the official resource for the most updated contact information for each agency or Tribe and provides information on consultation preferences. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC), for example, will conduct the site file search with no consultant required. There is typically a charge for that service. ADOT has an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with GRIC that allows EP to pay GRIC directly for their services. To procure the services of any GRIC Staff for a project, the HPT Staff notifies the Cultural Resources Program Manager to utilize the IGA. Other entities may require an on-site visit to access their site files and other records. If necessary, a consultant may be tasked with doing background research requiring an on-site visit. If necessary, additional resources to be checked include local public agencies and historical societies. These are particularly useful for researching historic buildings.
Land Ownership. Agree Scheme Brief.
Land Ownership. In relation to each Eligible Dwelling identified by the Provider for the future receipt of the Help to Buy (Scotland) Affordable New Build Scheme Equity Funding, either the Provider or one of its Group Companies (a) has, or (b) will have prior to any drawdown of Equity Funding in respect of that Eligible Dwelling, or (c) can procure pursuant to binding contractual arrangements with the proprietor of the Eligible Dwelling, a Good and Marketable Title to such Eligible Dwelling.
Land Ownership. (a) Party B represents and warrants that:
(i) It is the registered proprietor of the Land; and
(ii) it has obtained the consent of all persons that have an interest in the Land prior to executing this Planning Agreement.
Land Ownership. (a) SPML Land is:
(i) the legal and beneficial owner or leaseholder of the SPML Land Real Property set out in the Valuation Report; and
(ii) has good and marketable title to the SPML Land Real Property free from Security (other than those created by or pursuant to the SPML Land Security Documents) and restrictions and onerous covenants (other than those set out in the Valuation Report in relation to that property).
(b) Except as disclosed in the Valuation Report relating to a property:
(i) no breach of any law, regulation or covenant is outstanding which adversely affects or might reasonably be expected to adversely affect the value, saleability or use of that property;
(ii) there is no covenant, agreement, stipulation, reservation, condition, interest, right, easement or other matter whatsoever adversely affecting that property;
(iii) all facilities necessary for the enjoyment and use of that property (including those necessary for the carrying on of its business at that property) are enjoyed by that property;
(iv) none of the facilities referred to in paragraph (iii) above are enjoyed on terms:
(A) entitling any person to terminate or curtail its use of that property; or
(B) which conflict with or restrict its use of that property;
(v) SPML Land has not received any notice of any adverse claim by any person in respect of the ownership of that property or any interest in it which might reasonably be expected to be determined in favour of that person, nor has any acknowledgement been given to any such person in respect of that property; and
(vi) that property is held by SPML Land free from any lease or licence (other than those entered into in accordance with this Agreement).
Land Ownership. 2.1 The Property at Spinning Point, Rossendale is owned by Party B. Party B warrants that no person other than Party B has any legal or equitable interest in the Property. The Property will be let from Party B to Party C on [details of lease (or heads of terms of lease) from Party B to Party C] on [when]. (A plan is attached showing the Property edged in red).
2.2 The Property shall remain in the ownership of Party C for xxxx when it will revert to the ownership of Party B.
Land Ownership. 5.1. The Landowner represents and warrants they are the sole owners of the Land.
