Limitations and Conclusions Sample Clauses

Limitations and Conclusions. Despite its strengths, the results from the present work must be considered in light of its weaknesses. First, differences in sample characteristics prevented the direct comparison of SCARED data for treatment- and non-treatment seeking samples. This critical next step is needed to establish or confirm that clinical cutoff scores have acceptable specificity and sensitivity in both community and treatment-seeking samples. One set of cutoffs may not be sufficient for such disparate samples. Instead, separate cutoffs may be necessary to appropriately accommodate both groups. Second, issues related to age, sex, and ethnicity are beyond the scope of the current study. Previous research suggests that such factors may differentially impact discriminant validity, diagnostic utility, and informant agreement on the SCARED (e.g., Xxxx et al., 2003; Xxxxxxxx et al., 2009; Xxxx et al., 2011); however little is known about the extent to which these relations vary across community compared to treatment-seeking samples. In the present study, the majority of participants at both sites were Caucasian. Targeted recruitment is needed in future studies to obtain a more diverse sample in both community and treatment-seeking populations. Third, although the treatment-seeking sample in Study 1 is the largest to date to test the SCARED in conjunction with diagnostic interviews, the community sample of anxiety- disordered youth in Study 2 was relatively small. Given the limited number of anxious youth in the community sample (N=33), our ability to generalize the findings from this group is somewhat limited. Studies with small samples have a lower likelihood of identifying true effects given their relatively low power. Large community-based studies that administer the SCARED in conjunction with a clinical interview, such as the K-SADS-PL, are needed to yield a larger number of anxious youth. Studies that directly compare the scores on the SCARED in well- matched treatment-seeking and community populations will likely need to oversample from the community to achieve this goal. While there is no way to confirm this, data from Study 1 suggest that timeframe instructions may not, in this context, have a large influence on how participants respond. Given the various contexts in which the SCARED is administered, it is important that researchers carefully consider, and report, the timeframe they instruct participants to use when completing the SCARED. Finally, the present study tested pare...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Limitations and Conclusions. ‌ The immediate implications of the comparative analyses will be to the Africa CDC and the implementation of the IWD. However, one limitation includes the fact that the methods heavily rely on internet research; the sample evaluated was small. Additionally, with some of the data coming from websites of the LMS, self-reporting could contain potential biases. Given the time frame of this project, there were resources outside of internet sites that were examined. But a more comprehensive assessment should include interviews with technical members of each selected LMS, together with technical members of various universities who participated in the process of LMS analysis for their own institutions. This would provide a thorough qualitative analyses of experiences using the various LMS and resolutions about features from technical personnel of the LMS, as they have a better understanding. Lastly, with the analyses being exclusive to the Africa CDC IWD needs and priorities, other organizations may not be able to utilize this work as the findings are not necessarily generalizable. With the mission to “strengthen Africa’s public health institutions’ capabilities to detect and respond quickly and effectively to disease outbreaks and other health burdens through an integrated network of continent-wide preparedness, response, public health surveillance, laboratory, and research programs” [2], Africa CDC is a growing organization that is set to implement the IWD. The institute will train public health personnel and ultimately work to strengthen the healthcare workforce throughout Africa. In order for this to be implemented and beneficial, a LMS will be set up to support the pedagogical environment. Therefore, the need to establish an LMS that correlates with the priorities of the Africa CDC IWD implementation was imperative. With the analyses of LMSs, we hope that the offered recommendation is considered, and further commits to incorporating Canvas as the LMS for the IWD.
Limitations and Conclusions. This cross-sectional study captured PMA at one point of time, yet it is likely that PMA is a dynamic phenomenon. Whilst there may be some relatively unchangeable predictors of PMA such as personality and previous experi- ence, there are also likely to be some anteced- ents that change over time. Situational factors such as workload, work-life issues, changes to company policies and practices (e.g., mentor- ing training programs), and changes to organ- izational climate (e.g., downsizing) may alter PMA. Length of the mentorship did not come out to be a significant variable. In future it may be more useful to consider the stages of men- toring, rather than assuming that length is lin- early related to PMA. It may be that these findings are only ap- plicable to mentoring within universities. However, as the employees in this study were involved in the operational and business func- tions of the university there may be some gen- erality to the findings. Moreover, given that the antecedents in this study were either dispo- sitional (e.g., personality) or not unique to a university sample (e.g., workload) the results may relate to other contexts. The extent to which protégés and mentors agree about the level of psychosocial support being provided in their relationship is an im- portant factor for work outcomes. However, this study has shown that PMA is not readily achieved. While the results point to a number of situational and dispositional factors that can be used to improve PMA, further work is needed to xxxxxx a greater understanding of the antecedents and outcomes of PMA. Xxxxx, X., Xxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., & Xxxxxxx, G. (1997a). A field study of factors re- lated to supervisors’ willingness to mentor others. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 1-22. Xxxxx, X., Xxxxxx, M., & Xxxxxxxxx, S. (1997b). The mentor's perspective: A qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behav- ior, 51, 70-89. Xxxxx, X., Xxxxx, X., & Xxxxx, R. (1996). Early career outcomes of graduate employ- ees: the effect of mentoring and ingra- tiation. Journal of Management Stud- ies, 33, 95-118. Baird, X., & Xxxx, K. (1983). Career dynam- ics: managing the superior/subordinate relationship. Organizational Dynamics, 11(4), 46-64. Xxxx, X., & Xxxxxxxx, P. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In

Related to Limitations and Conclusions

  • Limitations and Conditions on Benefits The benefits and payments provided under this Agreement shall be subject to the following terms and limitations:

  • Limitations and Exclusions The limitation and exclusion in this Section 8 shall not apply: (i) to the extent that liability cannot be limited or excluded according to the Applicable Law; (ii) in cases of our willful misconduct and gross negligence; (iii) in cases of bodily injuries or death caused by our negligence; and (iv) in cases of our fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation.

  • Exceptions and Limitations For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

  • Restrictions and Conditions (a) Any book entries for the shares of Restricted Stock granted herein shall bear an appropriate legend, as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion, to the effect that such shares are subject to restrictions as set forth herein and in the Plan. (b) Shares of Restricted Stock granted herein may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by the Grantee prior to vesting. (c) If the Grantee’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries is voluntarily or involuntarily terminated for any reason (including death) prior to vesting of shares of Restricted Stock granted herein, all shares of Restricted Stock shall immediately and automatically be forfeited and returned to the Company.

  • Conditions and Limitations The admission of any Person as a Substituted Member or an Additional Member shall be conditioned upon (i) such Person’s written acceptance and adoption of all the terms and provisions of this Agreement, either by (A) execution and delivery of a counterpart signature page to this Agreement countersigned by the Managing Member on behalf of the Company or (B) any other writing evidencing the intent of such Person to become a Substituted Member or an Additional Member and such writing is accepted by the Managing Member on behalf of the Company.

  • DISCLAIMERS; EXCLUSIONS; LIMITATIONS Subject to §4, neither party makes any warranties (express, implied, or otherwise), including implied warranties of merchantability, non-infringement, fitness for a particular purpose, or title, related to its performance or anything else provided under this Agreement. Neither party will be liable for any special, incidental, punitive, or consequential damages of any kind for any reason whatsoever relating to this Agreement, even if such damages were reasonably foreseeable.

  • Limitations on Representations and Warranties Except for the representations and warranties specifically set forth in this Agreement, neither Purchaser nor any of its agents, Affiliates or representatives, nor any other Person, makes or shall be deemed to make any representation or warranty to Seller, express or implied, at law or in equity, with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby, and Purchaser hereby disclaims any such representation or warranty whether by Purchaser or any of its officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives or any other Person.

  • Restrictions and Limitations (a) The Trust shall not lend assets of the Trust to any officer or Trustee of the Trust or to any officer, director, or stockholder (or partner of a stockholder) of, or person financially interested in, the investment adviser or any underwriter of the Trust, or to the investment adviser of the Trust or to any underwriter of the Trust. (b) The Trust shall not restrict the transferability or negotiability of the shares of the Trust, except in conformity with the statements with respect thereto contained in the Trust's Registration Statement, and not in contravention of such rules and regulations as the SEC may prescribe. (c) The Trust shall not permit any officer or Trustee of the Trust, or any officer, director, or stockholder (or partner of a stockholder) of the investment adviser or any underwriter of the Trust to deal for or on behalf of the Trust with himself as principal or agent, or with any partnership, association or trust in which he has a financial interest; provided that the foregoing provisions shall not prevent, to the extent consistent with applicable securities laws: (1) officers and Trustees of the Trust from buying, holding, redeeming, or selling shares in the Trust, or from being officers, directors, or stockholders (or partners of a stockholder) of or otherwise financially interested in the investment adviser or any underwriter of the Trust; (2) purchases or sales of securities or other property by the Trust from or to an affiliated person or to the investment adviser or any underwriter of the Trust, if such transactions are not prohibited by the 1940 Act or have been exempted by SEC order from the prohibitions of the 1940 Act; (3) purchases of investments for the portfolio of the Trust through a securities dealer who is, or one or more of whose partners, stockholders, officers, or directors is, an officer or Trustee of the Trust, if such transactions are handled in the capacity of broker only and commissions charged do not exceed customary brokerage charges for such services; (4) employment of legal counsel, registrar, transfer agent, dividend disbursing agent, or custodian who is, or has a partner, stockholder, officer, or director who is, an officer or Trustee of the Trust, if only customary fees are charged for services to the Trust; (5) sharing statistical research, legal and management expenses and office hire and expenses with any other investment company in which an officer or Trustee of the Trust is an officer, trustee, or director or otherwise financially interested.

  • Geographic Area and Sector Specific Allowances, Conditions and Exceptions The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant. Where the Employer does work which falls under the following headings, the Employer agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • Exclusions and Limitations The aforementioned “Limited Warranty” does not apply to any Products which have been subjected to a) Failure to pay the purchase price towards Peimar or its subsidiaries which have put the modules on the market provided that (i), the payment was due and (ii) the Buyer who has obtained the modules from Peimar or one of its distributors (Direct Customer) is not entitled to withhold the purchase price or parts of the purchase price. Xxxxxx must inform the Buyer about the non- payment and provide the name and the full address of the Direct Customer which has failed to pay the modules. In case that Xxxxxx can reject the claim under this warranty based on this provision, the Buyer can deposit the amount not paid in order to trigger the warranty claims; b) Failure to comply with Xxxxxx’s installation manual applicable during the Validity of this Limited Warranty pursuant to Sec 10; c) Service by service technicians who are not qualified under the relevant law and/or applicable regulations at the place of installation; d) The Product's type, nameplate or module serial number is changed, erased or made illegible (other than by any act or omission of Peimar); e) The Product’s installation on mobile units (except photovoltaic tracking system), such as vehicles, ships or offshore-structures; f) Exposure to voltage in excess to the maximum system voltage or power surges; g) Defective components in the construction on which the module is mounted; h) exposure to mold discoloration or similar external effects; i) exposure to any of the following: extreme thermal or environmental conditions or rapid changes in such conditions, corrosion, oxidation, unauthorized modifications or connections, unauthorized opening, servicing by use of unauthorized spare parts, accident, force of nature (such as lightning strike, earthquake), influence from chemical products or other acts beyond Peimar’s reasonable control (including damage by fire, flood, etc.);

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!