LINES OF DEMARCATION – DISPUTES MECHANISM Sample Clauses

LINES OF DEMARCATION – DISPUTES MECHANISM. If matters involving the appropriateness of the work assignment of employees in skilled trades classifications are not resolved, the Union shall present the matter in writing to the skilled Trades Modernization Committee, setting forth all the facts and circumstances surrounding the case and the position taken. The skilled Trades Modernization Committee shall attempt to resolve the matter. If unable to resolve the case within thirty (30) days of the appeal, the case shall be withdrawn without prejudice by the Union or may be appealed to an arbitrator for final and binding decision. Such arbitrator shall be familiar with trades issues.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
LINES OF DEMARCATION – DISPUTES MECHANISM. ‌ If matters involving the appropriateness of the work assignment of employees in an apprenticeship are not resolved the Union shall present the matter in writing to the Committee setting forth all the facts and circumstances surrounding the case and the position taken. The Committee shall attempt to resolve the matter. If unable to resolve the case within thirty (30) days of the appeal, the case shall either be withdrawn without prejudice by the Union or may be appealed to an arbitrator for final and binding decision. Such arbitrator shall be familiar with trades issues.‌
Sample 1Sample 2
LINES OF DEMARCATION – DISPUTES MECHANISM. If matters involving the appropriateness of the work assignment of employees in skilled trades classifications are not resolved, the Union shall present the matter in writing to the Skilled Trades Committee, setting forth all the facts and circumstances surrounding the case and the position taken. The Skilled Trades Committee shall attempt to resolve the matter. If unable to resolve the case within thirty (30) days of the appeal, the case shall be withdrawn without prejudice by the Union or may be appealed to an arbitrator for final and binding decision. Such arbitrator shall be familiar with trades issues. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Intentionally Left Blank PAYMENT OF SKILLED TRADES COMMITTEES The Company will pay wage continuance without loss of benefits and necessary expenses of employee members. APPRENTICESHIP HOURS This has reference to the discussion and concerns raised during the recently-concluded negotiations concerning the skilled trades issue. It is agreed that the bona fide apprenticeshipas referred to in the Skilled Trades Agreement is to reflect training of eight thousand hours or somewhat less, as determined by the joint committee, that is, the current seven thousand six hundred and eighty hours. Notwithstanding this, it is agreed that the Joint Trades Committee will develop standards that may be required in order to take into consideration any specific case where the term of apprenticeship is less than the required hours, and for which special circumstances may apply. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK RULE HOURLY RATES OF PAY AND SHIFT DIFFERENTIALS BASIC RATES OF PAY Starting Rates: Except as provided in Note below, employees entering the service on or after March will be compensated as follows: months of cumulative compensated service of job rate 2nd months of of job rate 3rd months of of job rate Thereafter of job rate NOTE : This provision will not apply to apprentices trainees. NOTE 2: This provision will replace all existing step rate provisions. An employee subject to paragraph above, except when moving to a classification that had step rate provisions, will, when entering a different classification in the same bargaining unit, be compensated at the same percentage of the job rate of the classification being entered as he was receiving in the classification being vacated. Service in the classification vacated will be counted as service in the classification entered for purposes of application of paragraph An employee su...
Sample 1

Related to LINES OF DEMARCATION – DISPUTES MECHANISM

  • Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Registry Operator will comply with the following dispute resolution mechanisms as they may be revised from time to time:

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Process Owner may establish a dispute resolution process to be utilized in advance of that outlined in Tex. Gov’t Code, Chapter 2260.

  • Dispute Resolution Mechanism a. Any dispute regarding the administration of the Institute at the Company or plant level shall be subject to expedited resolution by the Chairs of the Union and Company Negotiating Committees and the Executive Director of ICD who shall apply the policies, rules and regulations of the Governing Board and the provisions of this Section in ruling on any such dispute. Rulings of the Executive Director may be appealed to the Governing Board, but shall become and remain effective unless stayed or reversed by the Governing Board.

  • Mini-Bid Dispute Resolution Process If the Authorized User does not have a dispute resolution policy, please refer to OSC or OGS dispute resolution policy for guidance in creating a policy. In the event the Contractor has any disputes with the Authorized User, the Contractor shall so notify the Authorized User in writing. If either party notifies the other of such dispute, the other party shall then make good faith efforts to solve the problem or settle the dispute amicably, including meeting with the party’s representatives to attempt diligently to reach a satisfactory result through negotiation. In the event that the Contractor and the Authorized User are unable to resolve a conflict through negotiation, then both parties will comply with the Authorized User’s stated dispute resolution policy which must be included as part of the Authorized User Agreement. If the conflict is still unresolved, please refer to section 4.2.1.II.A.3 for guidance. Mini-Bid Proposal Validity All Contractor responses to Authorized User Mini-Bids must remain open and valid for at least 60 days from the Mini-Bid opening date, unless the time for awarding the Authorized User Agreement is extended by mutual consent of the Authorized User and the Contractor. A Contractor’s Mini-Bid response shall continue to remain an effective offer, firm and irrevocable, subsequent to such 60 day period until either tentative award of the Authorized User Agreement by the Authorized User is made or withdrawal of the Contractor response in writing by the Contractor. Tentative award of the Authorized User Agreement shall consist of written notice to that effect by an Authorized User to a successful Contractor, who shall thereupon be obligated to execute a formal Authorized User Agreement. SIGNATURE PAGE

  • Opt-Out Procedure The procedure that enables Eligible Consumers to affirmatively elect not to participate in the program and either remain on or revert to Basic Service.

  • CENTRAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to disputes and grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Board Collective Bargaining Act, 2014 central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply. In the event that central language is being grieved locally, the local parties shall provide the grievance to their respective central agents.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Prior to filing of litigation, the parties may select non-binding mediation as a method of conflict resolution for issues arising out of or relating to this procurement process or any contract resulting from or any contemplated transaction. The parties agree that if non-binding mediation is chosen as a resolution process, the parties must agree to the chosen mediator(s) and that all mediation venue shall be at a location in Xxx Xxxxx County, Texas or agreed by the parties. The parties agree to share equally the cost of the mediation process and venue cost.

  • Negotiation; Alternative Dispute Resolution The Parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to the performance of services under this Agreement. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute, then, pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Section 21.36, Contractor may submit to the Contracting Officer a written request for administrative review and documentation of the Contractor's claim(s). Upon such request, the Contracting Officer shall promptly issue an administrative decision in writing, stating the reasons for the action taken and informing the Contractor of its right to judicial review. If agreed by both Parties in writing, disputes may be resolved by a mutually agreed-upon alternative dispute resolution process. If the parties do not mutually agree to an alternative dispute resolution process or such efforts do not resolve the dispute, then either Party may pursue any remedy available under California law. The status of any dispute or controversy notwithstanding, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with the Agreement and the written directions of the City. Neither Party will be entitled to legal fees or costs for matters resolved under this section.

  • Governing Law; Dispute Resolution This Agreement shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 9(a), 9(c), and 9(h) of the Employment Agreement.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) The City and the Union encourage the use of the City’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Program or other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes to resolve non-contractual workplace conflicts/disputes. Participation in the program or in an ADR process is entirely voluntary and confidential.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.