Low efficiency of justice Sample Clauses

Low efficiency of justice. The current judiciary in the Czech Republic is generally not very efficient as a result of a combination of problems and disparities at the institutional, legislative and personnel level. And yet, functioning judiciary is an essential prerequisite for law application and enforcement which must be fast and efficient from the subject´s point of view (natural persons and legal entities), and also economically viable for the state and considerate towards the basic rights of the persons against whom the law is enforced. At the legislative level, ensuring a long term evaluation of experience gained from practice and judicature proves to be problematic. Currently, issues that should be subsequently addressed by legislation are not analysed on a regular basis as part of the legislative process. At the institutional level, advanced information technologies, such as technologies transmitting images and sound, are not used sufficiently. In addition to the development of modern technologies, it is also necessary to use electronic tools for the efficient management of processes within the justice system, and for external communication, to a greater extent. In particular, the development of programmes aiming to make the transmission of data between the individual sections of the judiciary much easier. At the personnel level, the professional and qualification standards of judiciary staff have not been developed sufficiently. The filing and clerical agenda presents a burden for the courts, and in order to make the agenda more efficient it is essential not only to introduce legislative amendments, but also to strengthen professional and administrative capacities. The efficiency of justice (particularly in terms of the duration of proceedings) in some types of proceedings lags behind the EU average and also the total cost of some types of proceedings is higher than in other EU countries. Alternative ways of settling disputes (mediation, Alternative Dispute Resolution and others) are used to a lesser extent. In terms of criminal law, it is necessary to focus on increasing the quality and efficiency of the imposed alternative punishment and measures. From a long-term point of view, judiciary does not address the high level of recidivism of offenders, in particular in property crime, despite the fact that the causes have been known for a long time. The Czech Republic ranks 31st (out of 34 Member States) in the evaluation of the business environment among the OECD countries. T...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Low efficiency of justice

  • Department of Justice Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx Student Loan Repayment Program (JRJSLRP) Service Agreement – Secondary Term of Service NAME: In consideration of the student loan repayment incentive for which I may qualify under 34 U.S.C. §10671, such incentive having been offered above and beyond the incentive(s) from which I have already benefitted from in exchange for a term of service that I have fulfilled, I hereby agree as follows:

  • Office of Justice Programs The Provider must report suspected fraud, waste and abuse to the OAG’s Office of the Inspector General at 000-000-0000.

  • Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994—Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, (59 FR 7629), 3 C.F.R., 1994 Comp. p. 859.

  • Frequency of Evaluations 36.2.1 Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary and trial service periods and annually thereafter. If the supervisor identifies a performance concern during the evaluation period, the supervisor may provide feedback. The supervisor will provide written documentation to the employee with a copy kept in the supervisor’s working file.

  • Public Procurement 1. The Parties consider the liberalization of their respective public procurement markets as an objective of this Agreement.

  • Frequency of Evaluation Short form employees shall be evaluated one (1) time per year, which evaluation shall be completed no later than June 1.

  • Agency of Human Services The Agency of Human Services is responsible for overseeing all contracts and grants entered by any of its departments, boards, offices and business units, however denominated. The Agency of Human Services, through the business office of the Office of the Secretary, and through its Field Services Directors, will share with any named AHS-associated party to this Agreement oversight, monitoring and enforcement responsibilities. Party agrees to cooperate with both the named AHS-associated party to this contract and with the Agency of Human Services itself with respect to the resolution of any issues relating to the performance and interpretation of this Agreement, payment matters and legal compliance.

  • OFFSET CREDIT/COOPERATION This Contract has been entered into in direct support of LOCKHEED XXXXXX'x international offset programs. All offset benefit credits resulting from this Contract are the sole property of LOCKHEED XXXXXX to be applied to the offset program of its choice. SELLER shall assist LOCKHEED XXXXXX in securing appropriate offset credits from the respective country government authorities.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!