Monitoring, Audits, and Evaluations Sample Clauses

Monitoring, Audits, and Evaluations. 12.1 The Grantee shall supply to the Agency an audit that is in compliance with the Single Audit Act of 1984, 31 U.S.C., Chapter 75, and OMB’s UG, 2 C.F.R. Part 200, applicable at the time costs were incurred. 12.2 The Agency reserves the right to conduct, or cause to be conducted, an independent audit of all funds received by the Grantee under this grant award. Such an audit may be performed by the local government audit staff, a certified public accounting firm, or other auditors as designated by the Agency and must be conducted in accordance with applicable federal rules and regulations, grant award guidelines, and established professional standards and practices. 12.3 The Grantee understands that acceptance of funds under this grant award acts as acceptance of the authority of the State Auditor’s Office, or any successor agency, to audit or investigate the expenditure of funds under this grant award or any subcontract. The Grantee further agrees to cooperate fully with the State Auditor’s Office or its successor, including providing all records requested. The Grantee will ensure that this clause concerning the authority to audit funds received indirectly by subcontractors through the Grantee and the requirement to cooperate is included in any subcontract it awards. 12.4 The Grantee shall develop and maintain a sub-contractor monitoring system, acceptable to the Agency, covering any sub-contract it awards from this grant award. Complete records of all monitoring performed by the Grantee shall be maintained and made available to the Agency during such sub-contract performance periods and for as long thereafter as an unresolved deficiency may require. 12.5 The Agency reserves the right to conduct or cause a designee to conduct monitoring and evaluation studies of the performance of the Grantee or any sub-contractor for services rendered under this grant award. The Agency retains the right to perform such monitoring and evaluation studies that it determines necessary and will report preliminary results to the Grantee and any sub- contractor before the monitoring and evaluation is concluded and the final results are made a matter of record. 12.6 If a charitable or faith-based organization who is a sub-contractor to the Grantee establishes a separate account for the government funds provided through this grant award, then only the services and activities supported by those funds will be subject to audit by the Agency or its duly authorized representatives. 1...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Monitoring, Audits, and Evaluations. 11.1 The Grantee shall supply to the Agency an audit that is in compliance with the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended, July 1996, 31 U.S.C., Chapter 75, and OMB’s UG, 2 C.F.R. Part 200, applicable at the time costs were incurred. 11.2 The Agency reserves the right to conduct, or cause to be conducted, an independent audit of all funds received by the Grantee under this grant award. Such an audit may be performed by the local government audit staff, a certified public accounting firm, or other auditors as designated by the Agency and must be conducted in accordance with applicable federal rules and regulations, grant award guidelines, and established professional standards and practices. 11.3 The Grantee understands that acceptance of funds under this grant award acts as acceptance of the authority of the State Auditor’s Office, or any successor agency, to audit or investigate the expenditure of funds under this grant award or any subcontract. The Grantee further agrees to cooperate fully with the State Auditor’s Office or its successor, including providing all records requested. The Grantee will ensure that this clause concerning the authority to audit funds received indirectly by subcontractors through the Grantee and the requirement to cooperate is included in any subcontract it awards. 11.4 The Grantee shall develop and maintain a sub-contractor monitoring system, acceptable to the Agency, covering any sub- contract it awards from this grant award.

Related to Monitoring, Audits, and Evaluations

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Evaluation Reports Where a formal evaluation of an employee's performance is carried out, the employee shall be provided with a copy to read and review. Provision shall be made on the evaluation form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee's signature in two (2) places, one indicating that the employee has read and accepts the evaluation, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the evaluation. The employee shall sign in one of the places provided within seven (7) calendar days. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of an evaluation report unless the signature indicates disagreement with the evaluation. The employee shall receive a copy of the evaluation report at the time of signing. An evaluation report shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!