National Stakeholders Clause Samples

The 'National Stakeholders' clause defines the parties within a country who have a vested interest or role in the subject matter of the agreement. This typically includes government agencies, regulatory bodies, industry representatives, and sometimes non-governmental organizations that are directly affected by or responsible for implementing the agreement's provisions. By clearly identifying these stakeholders, the clause ensures that all relevant parties are recognized and can be engaged in decision-making or compliance processes, thereby promoting transparency and effective collaboration.
National Stakeholders. The initial stakeholder group was a national assembly of experts in laboratory chemical and environmental safety. The purpose of this group was twofold: (a) to assure that the University Laboratory XL Proposal reflected state of the art thinking with regard to controlling the potential impacts of laboratory chemicals; and (b) to ensure that the Laboratory Environmental Management Standard developed by the XL Participants could reasonably apply to a broad spectrum of small, medium and large institutions. This national group participated in the development of the University Laboratory XL Proposal in a number of ways. • The Laboratory Consortium for Environmental Excellence (LCEE) sponsored national stakeholders’ meetings which were conducted in November 1997 in Boston, MA and March 1998 in Naples, Florida. These meetings included a broad cross-section of participants, including representatives of different-sized colleges and universities, representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), industry representatives, and representatives of various branches of the EPA. These meetings were instrumental in the formation and revision of the XL Proposal as presented to the EPA in February 1998 and then updated in April 1998. • People unable to attend the national stakeholders’ meetings were able to review the various drafts of the Laboratory XL Proposal at the Laboratory XL Home Page on the World Wide Web and comment electronically through the Laboratory XL e-mail listserve. Additionally, copies of the XL Proposal were mailed to individuals or organizations upon request. Over 100 people reviewed the proposals in this way. • Several professional groups reviewed and commented on the Laboratory XL Proposal, including: (i) the Laboratory Waste Management Task Force of the American Chemical Society; and (ii) the Government Relations Committee of the Campus Safety, Health and Environmental Management Division of the National Safety Council. • Many national and regional environmental or not-for-profit organizations were informed of this Laboratory XL Project and asked to participate. Those NGOs that have participated in the Laboratory XL Proposal include: the Tellus Institute, a not-for-profit organization with expertise in pollution prevention, sustainability and environmental performance measurement; Second Nature, an NGO promoting environmental literacy in secondary education; and Ecologia, an organization whose Board Member, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, has been a key NGO repre...
View SourceView Similar (3)
National Stakeholders. The initial stakeholder group was a national assembly of experts in laboratory chemical and environmental safety. The purpose of this group was twofold: (a) to assure that the University Laboratory XL Proposal reflected state of the art thinking with regard to controlling the potential impacts of laboratory chemicals; and (b) to ensure that the Laboratory Environmental Management Standard developed by the XL Participants could reasonably apply to a broad spectrum of small, medium and large institutions.
View Source

Related to National Stakeholders

  • Professional Standards The Contractor agrees to maintain the professional standards applicable to its profession and to consultants doing business in the United States Virgin Islands.

  • International Standards In determining whether an international standard, guide, or recommendation within the meaning of Articles 2 and 5 and Annex 3 of the TBT Agreement exists, each Party shall apply the principles set out in Decisions and Recommendations adopted by the Committee since 1 January 1995, G/TBT/1/Rev.8, 23 May 2002, Section IX (Decision of the Committee on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations with relation to Articles 2, 5 and Annex 3 of the Agreement), issued by the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade.

  • Informal Stage If a Teacher is unable to resolve a complaint informally, the Teacher may with the concurrence of the Bargaining Unit Executive initiate a complaint with his/her supervisor who shall answer the complaint in writing (if requested) within ten (10) days of receipt of the complaint. The problem must be brought to the attention of the supervisor within fifteen (15) days after the Teacher becomes aware, or would reasonably be expected to have become aware, of the circumstances giving rise to the complaint.

  • Professional Status The Superintendent affirms that he is not under contract with any other board of education covering any part or all of the term provided in this contract. Throughout the contract term, he will hold a valid and appropriate certificate to act as a superintendent of schools in the State of Nebraska which he will register and maintain on file in the school district’s central administrative office. This contract shall not be valid and the Board will not compensate the Superintendent for any service performed prior to the date that he registers his certificate.

  • National Shopping Goods estimated to cost less than $50,000 equivalent per contract, may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of national shopping procedures in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.5 and 3.6 of the Guidelines.