Open Research Sample Clauses

Open Research. Data Pilot (ORDP) As already described, this deliverable is associated with the Open Research Data Pilot (ORDP) that aims to improve and maximise access to and re-use of research data generated by the projects (e.g. coding, simulations, experiments and surveys). The produced datasets constitute of the various data types that are produced in the context of each project and are stored across repositories and hard drives throughout Europe. The success of the EC’s Open Research Data Pilot is therefore dependent on support and infrastructures that acknowledge disciplinary approaches on institutional, national and European levels. The pilot constitutes an excellent opportunity to stimulate and nurture the data- sharing ecosystem and has the potential to connect researchers interested in sharing and re-using data with the relevant services within their institutions (libraries, IT services), data centres and data scientists. The pilot should serve to promote the value of data sharing to both researchers and funders, as well as to forge connections between the various players in the ecosystem[2]. The HECARRUS project recognizes the value of regulating research data management issues in a proper way, to avoid disclosure of confidential research data. Accordingly, in line with the rules laid down in the Grant Agreement Model, the beneficiaries will deposit relevant project outcome data (results and numbers published in papers and public deliverables) while more specific research data will be publicly released after the approval of all consortium partners, considering the confidentiality that would initially be used to protect the results. 2.2.1 Enabling projects to register discover, access and re-use of research data
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Open Research. The University can consider requests to comply with the policies of collaborators but, given the extent of the University’s policies and processes, such additional obligations are usually not required.
Open Research. 2.3.1 The University of St Xxxxxxx is strongly committed to ensuring the widest possible access to its research6 and to supporting the opportunities that the move to open scholarship provides7. We have had an open access policy in place since 2013 and a research data management policy since 20148. We established an Open Research Steering Group in 2016 to oversee the University’s alignment with the evolving open research policy and cultural environment. 2.3.2 The Institution is closely monitoring compliance with the ‘REF2021: Decisions on staff and outputs’. Our current levels of compliance (at Feb 2018) with both REF2021 and RCUK policies exceed 90% and we continue to encourage open access for publications outside the scope of these policies. 3 xxxxx://xxx.xx-xxxxxxx.xx.uk/research/university/centres/ 4 xxxxx://xxx.xx-xxxxxxx.xx.uk/news/archive/2016/title,344202,en.php 5 xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/ 6 xxxxx://xxx.xx-xxxxxxx.xx.uk/library/services/researchsupport/openaccess/oapolicy/ 7 xxxxx://xxx.xx-xxxxxxx.xx.uk/about/governance/university-strategy/ 8 xxxxx://xxx.xx-xxxxxxx.xx.uk/staff/policy/research/researchdata/ 2.3.3 As of July 2017, 10,000 open access outputs (articles, conference proceedings, theses, datasets) have been logged in our institutional repository and are available from our public research portal9. We will continue to support our authors in making their outputs as widely available as possible. 2.3.4 We provide 0.5TB of secure, resilient, centrally-managed data storage for all Principal Investigators with additional storage available at a highly competitive rate. We are a pilot institution in the £ 1 million Jisc Research Data Shared Service project10, which aims to provide cost-effective research data management and digital preservation for the sector. 2.3.5 We established a Research Data Management Advisory Group in 2017 that brings together representatives from the Library, IT Services and the institutional research community with the aim of sharing best practice in advocacy, skills and knowledge to broadly support research data management and encourage open data practices. 2.3.6 We monitor compliance with funder open data policies and have seen a steady increase in compliance for, particularly, EPSRC- funded researchers from 42% in 2015 to 59% in 2017. Our operational plan to 2020 aims to increase compliance while working within the constraints imposed by legal or ethical responsibilities. In Jan 2018 we introduced new procedures for theses...

Related to Open Research

  • Research Primary Investigator as part of a multi-site study (25 points) • Co-Investigator as part of a multi-site study (20 points) • Primary Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (15 points) • Co-Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (10 points) • Develops a unit specific research proposal (5 points) • Conducts a literature review as part of a research study (5 points)

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • Clinical 1.1 Provides comprehensive evidence based nursing care and individual case management to a specific group of patients/clients including assessment, intervention and evaluation. 1.2 Undertakes clinical shifts at the direction of senior staff and the Nursing Director including participation on the on-call/after-hours/weekend roster if required. 1.3 Responsible and accountable for patient safety and quality of care through planning, coordinating, performing, facilitating, and evaluating the delivery of patient care relating to a particular group of patients, clients or staff in the practice setting. 1.4 Monitors, reviews and reports upon the standard of nursing practice to ensure that colleagues are working within the scope of nursing practice, following appropriate clinical pathways, policies, procedures and adopting a risk management approach in patient care delivery. 1.5 Participates in xxxx rounds/case conferences as appropriate. 1.6 Educates patients/carers in post discharge management and organises discharge summaries/referrals to other services, as appropriate. 1.7 Supports and liaises with patients, carers, colleagues, medical, nursing, allied health, support staff, external agencies and the private sector to provide coordinated multidisciplinary care. 1.8 Completes clinical documentation and undertakes other administrative/management tasks as required. 1.9 Participates in departmental and other meetings as required to meet organisational and service objectives. 1.10 Develops and seeks to implement change utilising expert clinical knowledge through research and evidence based best practice. 1.11 Monitors and maintains availability of consumable stock. 1.12 Complies with and demonstrates a positive commitment to Regulations, Acts and Policies relevant to nursing including the Code of Ethics for Nurses in Australia, the Code of Conduct for Nurses in Australia, the National Competency Standards for the Registered Nurse and the Poisons Act 2014 and Medicines and Poisons Regulations 2016. 1.13 Promotes and participates in team building and decision making. 1.14 Responsible for the clinical supervision of nurses at Level 1 and/or Enrolled Nurses/ Assistants in Nursing under their supervision.

  • Research Program The term “Research Program” shall mean the research program to be undertaken by TSRI under the direction and control of the Principal Investigator as expressly set forth on Exhibit A hereto.

  • Research Use The Requester agrees that if access is approved, (1) the PI named in the DAR and (2) those named in the “Senior/Key Person Profile” section of the DAR, including the Information Technology Director and any trainee, employee, or contractor1 working on the proposed research project under the direct oversight of these individuals, shall become Approved Users of the requested dataset(s). Research use will occur solely in connection with the approved research project described in the DAR, which includes a 1-2 paragraph description of the proposed research (i.e., a Research Use Statement). Investigators interested in using Cloud Computing for data storage and analysis must request permission to use Cloud Computing in the DAR and identify the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) or providers and/or Private Cloud System (PCS) that they propose to use. They must also submit a Cloud Computing Use Statement as part of the DAR that describes the type of service and how it will be used to carry out the proposed research as described in the Research Use Statement. If the Approved Users plan to collaborate with investigators outside the Requester, the investigators at each external site must submit an independent DAR using the same project title and Research Use Statement, and if using the cloud, Cloud Computing Use Statement. New uses of these data outside those described in the DAR will require submission of a new DAR; modifications to the research project will require submission of an amendment to this application (e.g., adding or deleting Requester Collaborators from the Requester, adding datasets to an approved project). Access to the requested dataset(s) is granted for a period of one (1) year, with the option to renew access or close-out a project at the end of that year. Submitting Investigator(s), or their collaborators, who provided the data or samples used to generate controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy and who have Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and who meet any other study specific terms of access, are exempt from the limitation on the scope of the research use as defined in the DAR.

  • Commercialization Intrexon shall have the right to develop and Commercialize the Reverted Products itself or with one or more Third Parties, and shall have the right, without obligation to Fibrocell, to take any such actions in connection with such activities as Intrexon (or its designee), at its discretion, deems appropriate.

  • Development License Subject to the terms and conditions of this XXXX, You are licensed to perform an installation of the SOFTWARE for an unlimited use in designing, testing and creating Developed Software by unlimited Developers on one or more computers.

  • Research Project The findings of any research project, which would change the provisions of this Agreement will not be implemented until such changes are negotiated and agreed to by the parties.

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process. b. Student evaluation packets for each class containing instruments and instructions shall be distributed to each faculty member by the first week of December during the fall semester and by the last week in April during the spring semester. c. It is expressly agreed that the faculty member being evaluated shall not be present in the classroom when the student evaluation is being administered and that all instruction to students with regard to such student evaluation shall be included in writing on the instrument, provided further that the designated unit or non-unit professional shall return the student evaluation directly to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The administering of the student evaluation shall be the responsibility of the President of the College or the President’s designee who shall determine who among unit or non-unit professionals shall administer such student evaluation. Student evaluations shall be valid only if signed by the student; provided, however, that faculty members shall not be entitled to the identity of the student responding unless such student evaluation is used as a basis for dismissal or other disciplinary action and such will be communicated to the students. d. The data from the student evaluation shall be tabulated and copies sent to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The raw data shall be retained by the College for a period of one (1) year during which time the faculty member shall have access thereto upon written request. e. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall review the tabulated data and shall forward a data summary to the faculty member by January 23 for the fall semester and by June 15 for the spring semester. f. The faculty member shall have seven (7) working days in which to respond to such data.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!