Oriented. The nurse has completed a program designed to teach the nurse the basic unit layout, routines, and equipment. Refresher orientation must be completed as determined by the Hospital or if requested by a nurse who has not worked on the specified unit at least once during the preceding three (3) months. Nurses shall notify the Hospital if they require a refresher orientation and the Hospital shall work with the nurse to arrange such orientation. 2.
Oriented. The nurse has completed a program designed to teach the nurse the basic unit layout, routines, and equipment. Refresher orientation must be completed as determined by the Hospital or if requested by a nurse who has not worked on the specified unit at least once during the preceding three
Oriented. This included information such as number of plant introductions processed, the number and types of tests conducted, or the number of accessions or plants subjected to therapy. Though important, NCPN is now moving forward and towards understanding the ‘outcome’ associated with such actions. As such, all stated NCPN project deliverable should do one or both of the following only: 1. Indicate both which one(s) and how specific ‘Outcomes’, ‘Action Items’ or ‘Timelines’ specified in the NCPN Strategic Plan FY 2021-2025 ‘Appendix’ are being satisfied. 2. Indicate a quantifiable ‘industry focused outcome’ to actions undertaken and its associated impact on stakeholders. Examples might include: o Number of New Releases (accessions) provided to Industry or other users ▪ Impacts on industry or stakeholders o Amount of Material Planted or Maintained in Foundations ▪ Impacts on industry or stakeholders o Number and Types of Clean Plant Units Distributed ▪ Impacts on industry or stakeholders Budget Plan Provide budget details that reflect the anticipated expenditures for the project presented (or that will be presented) on Standard Form 424A and expand on the details either in the form of a descriptive budget narrative or as suggested below or in the form of an electronic spreadsheet as suggested elsewhere in this ‘Request for Proposals’:
Oriented. A part of the publications’ contents is said to be either too general or too theoretical and therefore of limited applicability. Quite some papers give general information and conclusions like ˝consumers request a certain quality from the food producers˝ or ˝quality became a most important characteristic of the products within the world market˝ or ˝product quality can be achieved by implementing ISO series of standards˝, etc. There are not enough data on consumers’ attitudes, knowledge and habits regarding food in general, and especially regarding different food types chosen for case studies. Less focus on fruit than on the other product groups is observed There may be a perception that research in such “soft” science has a rather low “scientific value” compared to “pure” science. The “house” of scientific expertise in this field has therefore, perhaps, a poor foundation, while “the pillars behind food consumer science” are not interrelated and fastened together. This is the reason that a multidisciplinary approach is rare. It is observed that the accessibility of the scientific work is very limited. There is also a lack of interaction with the international scientific community. This is illustrated by the fact that by far the most publications are published in the local languages and nearly all of them are written by local authors. Some of the countries conclude that there is huge knowledge gap on food consumers´ science and that should be used as a stimulation for developing the base for further research and for obtaining knowledge about this topic.
