Part One. Data provided by the Employer
Part One. (a) The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is One Million Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand (1,536,000) shares, consisting of: (i) Nine Hundred Fifty Six Thousand (956,000) shares of Common Stock, no par value per share (“Common Stock”); and (ii) Five Hundred Eighty Thousand (580,000) shares of Preferred Stock, no par value per share (“Preferred Stock”), of which Two Hundred Eighty Thousand (280,000) shares are shares of New Class A 3% Cumulative Participating Preferred Stock (“New Class A Preferred Stock”) and Three Hundred Thousand (300,000) shares are shares of New Class B 5% Cumulative Participating Preferred Stock (“New Class B Preferred Stock”). The express terms and provisions of the Preferred Stock are as set forth in Part Two of this Article Fourth.
Part One. Progress on research and development, status of applications for regulatory approvals, manufacturing, sublicensing, marketing, and sales during the preceding calendar year, as well as plans for the next [***] period.
Part One. Introducing Our Agreement This Agreement replaces the previous City Wide Tenant Participation Compact 2001 and is the first three-way tenant participation agreement between the tenants and leaseholders of Sheffield City Council, Sheffield Homes’ Boards and staff and Sheffield City Council. Sheffield Homes is the Arms Length Management Organisation which manages Sheffield City Council’s housing. What is a Tenant Participation Agreement? The tenant participation agreement previously known as a compact sets out: • How tenants can get involved in decisions on housing issues that affect them • How we will work together to improve the housing service • How the agreement will be implemented and checked to ensure it is working properly Terms used in this document are explained in the Jargon Buster in Part Eight and are identified by the symbol . We use the word ‘tenant’ to include all tenants, leaseholders and residents of our estates. Dear All, This is the new city wide Tenant Participation Agreement for the tenants and residents of Sheffield City Council. This agreement has been developed by a steering group of tenants, staff from Sheffield Homes and from the Neighbourhoods and Community Care Directorate of Sheffield City Council. It has been widely consulted on. It is a living document that will evolve over time as tenant participation in Sheffield moves forward. Tenants have been actively involved in producing this agreement and produced a draft agreement at a weekend of workshops held at the National Tenants’ Resource Centre at Trafford Hall. Since then, a small group of enthusiastic tenants have worked for many months developing the ideas that came out of the weekend and ideas and draft policies have been shared widely with tenants and staff. The way in which the agreement was developed demonstrates our commitment to working together in a spirit of co-operation and partnership and this gives strength to the agreement in the future. The ultimate aim of the agreement is to give people a greater say in the way in which housing services are delivered and provide new opportunities for involvement. It sets out all the ways that tenants can get involved. We are committed to ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to get involved at a level and pace of their choosing. We have used a ladder of involvement and given an idea of time commitments so people can choose the level of involvement that’s right for them. We don’t want this document to gather dust on a shelf ...
Part One. Background and basics Part two: How Indonesia verifies the legality of timber and timber products Part three: How to recognise legal timber products from Indonesia Part four: Outcomes of the VPA Part five: Ensuring effective VPA implementation
Part One. The opportunities of the “Second Colonial Occupation” The Development Plan of 1945 and changes in the value of land The post-war policies of the colonial office brought a new agenda to Nyasaland in the shape of the Development Plan of 1945. This plan outlined a broad ranging set of reforms which would see chiefs come to mediate agricultural production in a more significant way than ever before. The changes that it heralded restructured the way in which land was managed and began to alter the meaning of ownership and access to this increasingly important resource. Prior to 1945 there was no sense that struggles over land formed any significant part of day-to-day life in the Mzimba District, or indeed in much of the Northern Province. No systematic collection of information about land rights and tenure had ever been undertaken in this part of the Protectorate, a fact which Xxxxxxxx, the district commissioner of Mzimba who was charged with surveying the land in his district, interpreted as meaning the “present absence of any problems due to land shortage”.10 Following the results of this 1945 survey into “Native Land Rights and Tenure” Xxxxxxxx concluded that the general principles upon which land was assigned and held “hardly vary throughout the Ngoni-Tumbuka area of N.A. M’mbelwa and the Henga-Tumbuka areas of Native Authorities Chikulamaembe and Katumbi”.11 The chiefs throughout these areas were presumed to be vested with the rights to control land, though in practice this was almost always delegated to the village headmen except in cases where large numbers of new migrants sought land on which to settle. According to the survey membership of a village carried with it “the right to cultivate a portion of the village lands”, and having once been allocated it became “vested in the individual and his family in perpetuity”.12 Even if the individual did not cultivate the plot of land he could maintain rights over it indefinitely unless the chief decided to evict him, examples of such eviction however were “almost unknown”.13 Land was considered a good which could be freely exchanged but not sold, and whilst a man was entitled to hand his land to someone known to the community, he could not do the same with a stranger without consulting the chief first. Whilst the results of the survey indicated that there were structures which managed land transactions, in practical terms they represented terms which were rarely consulted. In these areas where land was plentifu...
Part One. Instructions: Please determine the degree to which you agree with the 24 following statements (1-‐ do not agree at all ; 5 -‐ agree a great deal)
Part One. An eligible teacher may purchase up to seven hundred twenty-five (725) hours of Retirement Incentive from accrued accumulative leave based upon the following formula: Accrued accumulative leave x daily rate of pay ÷ 7.25 hours. The compensation to be paid each eligible teacher will be the product of the number of hours of accumulative leave times the teacher’s daily rate of pay ÷ 7.25 hours, but will not exceed $45,000.
Part One. If children do have a negative concord grammar, they would be expected to produce sentences with a negative concord construction as opposed to sentences using any NPIs in contexts where both are acceptable. Though they may not produce negative concord constructions all the time given that they do have an NPI grammar, they would be expected to make a significant number of mistakes in also producing negative concord sentences. This part examines the extent that children make these mistakes.
Part One. Section 2 Part two:
