Performance Task and Constructed-response Scoring Sample Clauses

Performance Task and Constructed-response Scoring. ETS will score Performance Task and constructed-response student responses (including mathematics responses in Spanish) to maximize validity and reliability while incorporating efficiencies wherever possible. Table 16 represents the division of labor between ETS and MI. Table 16. Performance Task and Constructed-Response Scoring by Content Area and Grade Smarter Balanced ELA Smarter Balanced Mathematics California NGSS Primary Language CAA and CA NGSS Alternate Grade 3 ETS MI - ETS Xxxxxxx Grade 4 ETS MI - ETS Xxxxxxx Grade 5 ETS MI ETS ETS Xxxxxxx Grade 6 MI ETS - ETS Xxxxxxx Grade 7 MI ETS - ETS Xxxxxxx Grade 8 MI ETS ETS ETS Xxxxxxx Grade 9 - - - ETS Xxxxxxx Grade 10 - - - ETS Xxxxxxx Grade 11 ETS ETS ETS ETS Xxxxxxx The procedures ETS proposes for California include: careful recruiting of raters utilizing ETS best practice hiring process extensive training of all levels of scoring leadership, not only on the prompts, rubrics, and related scoring material but on how best to monitor the quality of the scoring rigorous training of the raters in appropriately applying the rubric for each prompt type, following the generic sample responses that exemplify the quality required for each score point so that every prompt is scored on the same general criteria requiring new raters to demonstrate their accuracy by passing a “certification” test before being assigned to score a specific assessment and then by passing a shorter, more focused “calibration” test before each new prompt type using scoring leaders to read behind and monitor raters; scoring leaders have the option of evaluating responses a rater previously scored, with or without the knowledge of the score he or she gave (“informed” versus “blind” back rating) using scoring system’s live operational data to identify (and, for scoring leaders, then counsel) raters who are reading at unusually slow (or overly fast) rates using content scoring leaders to monitor the scoring leaders and their virtual teams including pre-scored validity responses (sometimes called monitor papers) within each rater’s set of assigned responses in order to evaluate ongoing accuracy while scoring regularly analyzing inter-rater reliability (IRR) statistics to verify that raters are scoring consistently (scoring system produces real-time IRR and validity response scoring statistics)
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Performance Task and Constructed-response Scoring

  • PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES 8 A. CONTRACTOR shall achieve performance objectives, tracking and reporting Performance 9 Outcome Objective statistics in monthly programmatic reports, as appropriate. ADMINISTRATOR 10 recognizes that alterations may be necessary to the following services to meet the objectives, and,

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer develops and manufactures various products for use in the defense, aerospace and security industries. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to expand its operations at various locations throughout California, including El Segundo, Redondo Beach, Palmdale, Sunnyvale, Woodland Hills, Azusa and Rancho Xxxxxxxx. As part of its expansion, Taxpayer will invest in manufacturing equipment, computer and electrical equipment and make tenant improvements to the above facilities. Additionally, Taxpayer will hire full-time employees as part of its expansion (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit “A” (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of Full- time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the salaries of any of the Full-time employees hired and retained within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the salary of any full-time employee that is not employed by the taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, Xxxxxxxx agrees that any full-time employee hired after the effective date of this agreement that is a “qualified full-time employee” (as defined in RTC section 23636) shall be excluded from the calculation of the net increase of full-time employees required by this Agreement if Taxpayer claims the credit allowed by RTC section 23636.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Performance Orders A Performance Order:

  • Vehicle Base Specifications Note: The actual vehicle awarded may exceed the minimum specifications stated below. The Authorized User may elect to add additional Options, delete Options, or substitute a vehicle feature that is an Option with another Option. See Contract Section III.6

  • Subprojects 1. The Borrower shall make Grants to Beneficiaries (Small Farmers, Municipalities and Organizations) for Subprojects (Farmers’ Business Initiatives, Infrastructure Subprojects and Environmental Subprojects) in accordance with eligibility criteria and procedures acceptable to the Bank as further detailed in the Project Operational Manual.

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.