Political Economy of Policymaking in Nigeria Sample Clauses

Political Economy of Policymaking in Nigeria. Applying the Kaleidoscope Model 2.10.1 Identification of professor and student pair XXXXX Xxxxxx and or ABU October 2015- Febru- ary 2016 1 Establishment of col- laborative team skilled in political economy and policy process analysis ; Capacity strengthening regarding Kaleidoscope Model political economy tools 3) Number of collab- orative research teams involving lo- cal partners formed and undertaking pol- icy re-search and analysis 2.10.2 Research Team Meetings IFPRI Virtual, Wash- ington, DC and Ibadan or Abuja Monthly 12 Minutes of meetings 1) Number of policy research and best practice papers gen- erated 2) Number of stakeholder learning forums held where findings/best prac- tices are presented 2.10.3 Research team field work: Field Work IFPRI Selected states in Nigeria April 2016, August 2016 (tenta- tive) 2 Data collection from key stakeholders involved in target research areas (e.g. land reform, youth employment, and insti- tutional reform); Better understanding of the barriers and opportuni- ties for improved policy outcomes, including pol- icy adoption and im- plementation 2.10.4 Research team analysis IFPRI Virtual, Wash- ington, DC and Ibadan or Abuja Monthly 12 Minutes of meetings and draft papers 2.10.5 Research team results presenta- tions IFPRI Washington, DC and Abuja Bi-yearly 2 Dissemination of results from data collection and analysis that applies the Kaleidoscope Model to improve policy out- comes
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Political Economy of Policymaking in Nigeria. Applying the Kaleidoscope Model 2.10.1 Identification of professor and student pair
Sample 1
Political Economy of Policymaking in Nigeria. Applying the Kaleido- scope Model This research activity will use the Kaleidoscope Model (KM) of Agricultural and Food Secu- rity Policy Change as an applied conceptual framework to explain drivers of policy change in the agricultural policy arena in the case of Nigeria. The framework is aimed at answering why a policy change occurs in one country (or state) and not another, in one policy arena but not another, or at one time period but not another. The KM will nicely complement many of the other planned research activities within the project, especially with respect to drivers of agricultural transformation and land governance issues. In particular during Year 1, this research activity will focus on the key question, namely, why there have been differential levels of land administration across Nigerian states and what are the limitations to more large-scale implementation of SLTR. The research activity will also involve Nigeri- an PhD students involved in public administration and policy studies to participate in the interviews and the construction of the tools with respect to the study above on land tenure reform. Please see relevant Activities Table under this Work plan Component for the time- line of this research activity in Year 1. Budget category‌ Year 0 Year 1 TOTAL Total direct labor Salary and wages $0 $137,256 $137,256 Fringe benefits $0 $29,710 $29,710 Consultants $0 $4,500 $4,500 Travel, transportation, and per diem $4,956 $126,273 $131,229 Equipment and supplies $0 $9,750 $9,750 Sub-awards (IFPRI) $441,482 $2,058,518 $2,500,000 Sub-awards (other than that for IFPRI) $0 $0 $0 Allowances $0 $0 $0 Participant training $0 $0 $0 Other direct cost $0 $79,221 $79,221 Indirect Cost $7,789 $100,545 $108,334 General & administrative costs $0 $0 $0 Material overhead $0 $0 $0 Total Estimated Cost $512,745 $2,545,773 $3,000,000 Budget category‌ Year 0 Year 1 TOTAL Total direct labor Salary and wages $74,652 $340,394 $415,046 Fringe benefits $43,671 $199,131 $242,802 Consultants $50,220 $438,000 $488,220 Travel, transportation, and per diem $14,134 $180,000 $194,134 Equipment and supplies $92,541 $240,095 $332,636 Sub-awards $0 $0 $0 Allowances $37,050 $168,750 $205,800 Participant training $0 $65,000 $65,000 Other direct cost $65,068 $128,047 $193,115 Indirect Cost $64,147 $299,101 $363,248 General & administrative costs $0 $0 $0 Material overhead $0 $0 $0
Sample 1

Related to Political Economy of Policymaking in Nigeria

  • Department of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture at 0-000-000-0000, 000-000-0000, or xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/plantind/ to determine those specific project sites located in the quarantined area or for any regulated article used on this project originating in a quarantined county. Regulated Articles Include

  • Learning and Development (i) Managers and supervisors are responsible for promoting and supporting learning activities for employees in their area of responsibility.

  • Foreign Terrorist Organizations Contractor represents and warrants that it is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization, as prohibited by Section 2252.152 of the Texas Government Code.

  • Training and Development 14.1 The parties are committed to, and acknowledge the mutual benefit to the employer and employee of planned human resource development and the provision and participation in relevant development opportunities (including accredited training).

  • Iran, Sudan and Foreign Terrorist Organizations The Dissemination Agent and the Administrator represent that neither the Dissemination Agent, the Administrator nor any parent company, wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries, and other affiliates of the Dissemination Agent or the Administrator is a company identified on a list prepared and maintained by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts under Section 2252.153 or Section 2270.0201, Texas Government Code, and posted on any of the following pages of such officer’s internet website: xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx/purchasing/docs/sudan-list.pdf, xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx/purchasing/docs/iran-list.pdf, or xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx/purchasing/docs/fto-list.pdf. The foregoing representation is made solely to enable the Issuer to comply with Section 2252.152, Texas Government Code, and to the extent such Section does not contravene applicable Federal or State law and excludes the Dissemination Agent, the Administrator and each parent company, wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries, and other affiliates of the Dissemination Agent or the Administrator, if any, that the United States government has affirmatively declared to be excluded from its federal sanctions regime relating to Sudan or Iran or any federal sanctions regime relating to a foreign terrorist organization.

  • Summary of Policy and Prohibitions on Procurement Lobbying Pursuant to State Finance Law §139-j and §139-k, this Contract includes and imposes certain restrictions on communications between OGS and a Vendor during the procurement process. A Vendor is restricted from making contacts from the earliest notice of intent to solicit offers/bids through final award and approval of the Procurement Contract by OGS and, if applicable, the Office of the State Comptroller (“restricted period”) to other than designated staff unless it is a contact that is included among certain statutory exceptions set forth in State Finance Law §139-j(3)(a). Designated staff, as of the date hereof, is identified in Appendix G, Contractor and OGS Information, or as otherwise indicated by OGS. OGS employees are also required to obtain certain information when contacted during the restricted period and make a determination of the responsibility of the Vendor pursuant to these two statutes. Certain findings of non-responsibility can result in rejection for contract award and in the event of two findings within a four-year period; the Vendor is debarred from obtaining governmental Procurement Contracts. Further information about these requirements can be found on the OGS website: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx.xxx/aboutOgs/regulations/defaultSFL_139j-k.asp.

  • Foreign Terrorists Organizations Contractor represents and warrants that it is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization, as prohibited by Section 2252.152 of the Texas Government Code.

  • Prohibition on Political Activity with City Funds In accordance with San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 12.G, Contractor may not participate in, support, or attempt to influence any political campaign for a candidate or for a ballot measure (collectively, “Political Activity”) in the performance of the services provided under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to comply with San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 12.G and any implementing rules and regulations promulgated by the City’s Controller. The terms and provisions of Chapter 12.G are incorporated herein by this reference. In the event Contractor violates the provisions of this section, the City may, in addition to any other rights or remedies available hereunder, (i) terminate this Agreement, and (ii) prohibit Contractor from bidding on or receiving any new City contract for a period of two (2) years. The Controller will not consider Contractor’s use of profit as a violation of this section.

  • Department of Housing and Urban Development This includes a HUD produced video titled “The Basics of the Fair Housing Act” which can be accessed via YouTube at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/watch?v=egXPe7HT7tc. Relief for Complainant

  • Political dialogue Article 3

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.