Pre-Publication Review. Upon notice, District may request and Researcher agrees to timely provide, prior to publication or re-publication, access to any report, memorandum, article, thesis or any other writing that includes Student Record Information provided under this Agreement and links District to any outcome or enables District to be linked to any outcome. District reserves the right to withdraw consent to the publication of any such writing if the District determines that the privacy rights of its students are jeopardized or such writing contains statements that the District considers unacceptable for publication due to, but not limited to, sampling error, flaws in analysis, or misrepresentation of findings.
Pre-Publication Review. A. The Parties agree to secure pre-publication approval from each other which shall not be unreasonably withheld or denied beyond thirty (30) days.
Pre-Publication Review. The publishing Party shall provide the other Party a sixty (60) day period in which to review and comment on proposed publications, including news releases and advertisements, that either disclose technical developments and/or research findings generated in the course of this Agreement, or identify Proprietary Information. The publishing Party shall not publish or otherwise disclose Proprietary Information or Protected Generated Information identified by the other Party, except as provided by law.
Pre-Publication Review. Principal Investigator will provide CMT an opportunity (a minimum of 30 days before submission or other public disclosure) to prospectively review any proposed publication, abstract, or other type of disclosure that reports the results of the Study (collectively, “Publication”). CMT further recognizes and accepts that under Institution’s mission as a non-profit, responsible medical center, Institution and its investigators must have a meaningful right to publish research results without CMT’s approval or editorial control, regardless of the Study’s outcome; provided, however, that if reasonably requested by CMT, Institution shall not publish or publicly disclose any confidential information belonging to CMT. If CMT reasonably determines that the proposed publication or public disclosure contains patentable subject matter which requires protection, CMT may request the delay of publication or public disclosure for a period of time not to exceed ninety (90) days for the purpose of filing patent applications. If no written response is received from CMT within the applicable review period, it may be conclusively presumed that publication or public disclosure may proceed without delay.
Pre-Publication Review. A. The Parties agree to secure pre-publication approval from each other which shall not be unreasonably withheld or denied beyond thirty (30) days. The proposed publication shall be deemed not objectionable, unless the proposed publication contains Proprietary Information, Protected CRADA Information, or material that would create potential statutory bars to filing United States or corresponding foreign patent applications, in which case express written permission shall be required for publication.
Pre-Publication Review. Upon notice, the parties may request in writing, to the party’s designee, and each agrees to timely provide 30 days prior to presentation, publication or re-publication, access to any report, memorandum, article, thesis or any other writing that includes data/record information provided under this agreement and that links the parties to any outcome or enables the parties to be linked to any outcome. The party’s designees agree to acknowledge receipt of these notices and can provide their comments during the 30 day review period. If no such acknowledgement is made, and if no comments are provided, the requesting party may move forward with publication after the 30 day review period. During the review period, the District reserves the right to withdraw consent to the publication of any such writing if the District determines that the privacy rights of its students and/or employees are jeopardized. IHE reserves the right to withdraw consent to the publication of any such writing if the IHE determines that the privacy rights of its teacher candidates and/or employees are jeopardized.
Pre-Publication Review. A. The Parties agree to secure pre-publication approval from each other which shall not be unreasonably withheld or denied beyond thirty (30) days. The only basis for not approving a publication shall be that it contains and would disclose Proprietary Information or Protected CRADA Information or would create potential statutory bars to filing the U.S. or corresponding foreign patent applications, or would disclose Classified Information or Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information.
Pre-Publication Review. A. The Parties anticipate that their employees may wish to publish technical developments and/or research findings generated in the course of this CRADA. On the other hand, the Parties recognize that an objective of this CRADA is to provide business advantages to Participant. In order to reconcile publication and business concerns, the Parties agree to a review procedure as follows:
Pre-Publication Review. To avoid loss of patent rights as a result of premature public disclosure of patentable information, each Party shall submit to the other Party all manuscripts describing scientific results obtained from the practice of the Assigned Patent Rights that have applicability to the receiving Party’s field, and the receiving Party shall notify the disclosing Party in writing within thirty (30) days after receipt of any disclosure whether the receiving Party desires to file or have filed a patent application on any invention disclosed in such scientific results with respect to its permitted field of use. In the event that the receiving Party desires to file such a patent application, the disclosing Party shall withhold publication or disclosure of such scientific results until the earlier of the date upon which (i) a patent application is filed thereon, or (ii) the Parties determine after consultation that no patentable invention exists or, alternatively, that patent protection should not be sought for such invention, or (iii) sixty (60) days after receipt by the disclosing Party of the receiving Party’s written notice of the receiving Party’s desire to file such patent application. Further, if such scientific results contain the information of the receiving Party that is subject to use and/or nondisclosure restrictions under this Article 6, the disclosing Party agrees to remove such information from the proposed publication or disclosure, upon request by the receiving Party. Any publication subject to this Section 6.4 shall include an acknowledgment of the contributions of each Party, in accordance with customary scientific norms.
Pre-Publication Review. A. The Parties anticipate that some of Contractor's Developers assigned to the Project may wish to publish technical developments and/or research findings generated in the course of this Agreement. On the other hand, the Parties recognize that a principal objective of this Agreement is to provide business advantages to Participant. In order to reconcile publication and business concerns, the Parties agree to a review procedure as follows:
