Prioritisation of worker exposure scenarios Sample Clauses

Prioritisation of worker exposure scenarios. ‌ Before developing an improved modelling framework for worker exposure within the BROWSE project, it was necessary to define, identify, group and prioritise exposure scenarios for model development. The definition of “workers” was taken as a starting point for defining a worker exposure scenario. EFSA defines workers as ‘persons who, as part of their employment, enter an area that has previously been treated with a PPP or who handle a crop that has been treated with a PPP’ (EFSA, 2010). This definition implies that workers are exposed to PPPs during activities taking place in the treated crop after the application. Hence, a re-entry exposure scenario was defined as a combination of a worker activity and a crop group (e.g. harvesting of orchard fruit). Next, a preliminary inventory of possible worker exposure scenarios was made based on the knowledge and experience of the BROWSE consortium members. The identified scenarios were subdivided according to the crop group and the timing of the activity relative to the harvest: pre-harvest, harvest and post-harvest activities. Since a wide range of exposure scenarios was identified while the available data were limited and not all scenarios were of high concern for human exposure, a prioritisation of those which had to be addressed within the BROWSE project was absolutely necessary. As one of the objectives of the project was to include representatives of all relevant stakeholders and end-users, a stakeholder consultation workshop was organized to gather stakeholders’ opinions about the proposed crop grouping and to identify the scenarios that should be considered as a priority for worker exposure modelling. The results of this workshop have been described in deliverable 4.1. Using the feedback from the stakeholders and taking account of the anticipated frequency and extent of the exposure and the availability of data, the following scenarios were identified as priority scenarios for exposure modelling in work package 2: - Outdoor scenarios • Orchard fruit: harvesting (Figure 1) • Orchard fruit: pruning • Orchard fruit: thinning • Grapes: harvesting (Figure 2) • Grapes: pruning • Grapes: thinning • Soft fruit: harvesting • Sowing of treated seeds - Indoor scenarios • Ornamentals: harvesting (Figure 3) • Fruiting vegetables: harvesting (Figure 4) The scenarios indicated in bold were taken as a first set of priority scenarios. Even though the conceptual and mechanistic model were developed with these scenarios as a...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Prioritisation of worker exposure scenarios

  • Non-discrimination Based on National Origin as evidenced by Limited English Proficiency The Contractor agrees to comply with the non-discrimination requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC Section 2000d, et seq., and with the federal guidelines promulgated pursuant to Executive Order 13166 of 2000, which require that contractors and subcontractors receiving federal funds must assure that persons with limited English proficiency can meaningfully access services. To the extent the Contractor provides assistance to individuals with limited English proficiency through the use of oral or written translation or interpretive services in compliance with this requirement, such individuals cannot be required to pay for such services.

  • UNIFORMS AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT 214. For employees required by the Appointing Officer to wear a uniform, beginning in fiscal year 2006-2007 and continuing for the duration of this Agreement, the City agrees to provide a uniform allowance each year in the amount of eight hundred fifty dollars ($850). The City will pay the uniform allowance in the payroll that includes September 1 of each year. Represented employees must be on duty status or approved leave on each September 1 to be eligible for the uniform allowance. Any eligible employee hired on or after March 1 will receive fifty percent (50%) of the uniform allowance that year.

  • Step 3 – Contract Language Disputes (a) If a grievance concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement, other than a grievance alleging that a disciplinary action (reduction in base pay, demotion, involuntary transfer of more than 50 miles by highway, suspension, or dismissal) was taken without cause, is not resolved at Step 2, the grievant or designated representative may appeal the grievance by submitting it to the Office Manager for the Office of the General Counsel of the Department of Management Services, 0000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxx, Xxxxx 000, Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, 00000-0950, or by email to: Xxxx0Xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx within 15 days following receipt of the decision at Step 2. The grievance shall include a copy of the grievance forms submitted at Steps 1 and 2, together with all written responses and documents in support of the grievance. When the grievance is eligible for initiation at Step 3, the grievance shall be filed on the grievance form contained in Appendix B of this Contract, setting forth specifically the facts on which the grievance is based, the specific provision(s) of the Contract allegedly violated, and the relief requested.

  • Employee Facilities Employee Facilities. Restrooms and attendant facilities shall be provided as required in the orders and regulations of the State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries. A good faith effort will be made by the Employer to provide facilities for employees’ personal belongings.

  • Required Coverages For Generation Resources Of 20 Megawatts Or Less Each Constructing Entity shall maintain the types of insurance as described in section 11.1 paragraphs (a) through (e) above in an amount sufficient to insure against all reasonably foreseeable direct liabilities given the size and nature of the generating equipment being interconnected, the interconnection itself, and the characteristics of the system to which the interconnection is made. Additional insurance may be required by the Interconnection Customer, as a function of owning and operating a Generating Facility. All insurance shall be procured from insurance companies rated “A-,” VII or better by AM Best and authorized to do business in a state or states in which the Interconnection Facilities are located. Failure to maintain required insurance shall be a Breach of the Interconnection Construction Service Agreement.

  • Trunk Group Connections and Ordering 5.2.1 For both One-Way and Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, if Onvoy wishes to use a technically feasible interface other than a DS1 or a DS3 facility at the POI, the Parties shall negotiate reasonable terms and conditions (including, without limitation, rates and implementation timeframes) for such arrangement; and, if the Parties cannot agree to such terms and conditions (including, without limitation, rates and implementation timeframes), either Party may utilize the Agreement’s dispute resolution procedures.

  • WORK STOPPAGES, SECONDARY BOYCOTTS, AND JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES 16.1 There will be during the term of this Agreement and as to any work covered hereby, no slowdown, no stoppage of work, no strike and no lockout, it being the good faith and intention of the parties hereto that by the execution of this Agreement, industrial peace shall be brought about and maintained, that the parties shall cooperate to the end that work may be done efficiently and without interruption. In the case of any violation of this Agreement the Employer and the Union shall be notified immediately.

  • WORK STOPPAGE AND SLOWDOWN Employees within the bargaining unit, MSEA-SEIU and its officers at all levels, agree that they will not instigate, promote, sponsor, condone or engage in any work stoppage, sympathy work stoppage or slowdown.

  • Foreign-Owned Companies in Connection with Critical Infrastructure If Texas Government Code, Section 2274.0102(a)(1) (relating to prohibition on contracts with certain foreign-owned companies in connection with critical infrastructure) is applicable to this Contract, pursuant to Government Code Section 2274.0102, Contractor certifies that neither it nor its parent company, nor any affiliate of Contractor or its parent company, is: (1) majority owned or controlled by citizens or governmental entities of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or any other country designated by the Governor under Government Code Section 2274.0103, or (2) headquartered in any of those countries.

  • Protective Clothing & Equipment While not being part of any issue of protective clothing/equipment, the company shall be required to provide the following protective equipment (SAA approved) for use, when necessary, by employees during the performance of their required duties:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.