Stakeholder Consultation. Stakeholder involvement is valued and a strength of the Arkansas planning effort. Public and private stakeholders are participating through various activities facilitated by HBEPD staff and contractors. Key activities/stakeholder involvement strategies are listed below: Steering Committee - 2011 Begun in May 2011, a 21-member Steering Committee appointed by the Insurance Commissioner met for two hours bi-weekly to coordinate planning efforts and make recommendations to the Commissioner, legislators and Governor about development of a State-run Exchange. Local and First Data Consultants assumed facilitation duties for the Steering Committee. Meeting summaries can be found on the Exchange Planning website at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/Steering.html. Comprised of two liaisons to each of six workgroups, two representatives of the major contractors (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences [UAMS] and First Data), Governor’s Office, Arkansas Center for Health Improvement (home of AR Surgeon General), AR Department of Human Services (DHS) Director, and two legislators (one Democrat; one Republican), the Steering Committee met until November 15, 2011 when it recommended that efforts to plan a State-run Exchange cease. Steering Committee - 2012 Commissioner Xxxxxxxx appointed a new Steering Committee in March to make recommendations relative to FFE Partnership development in Arkansas. Diverse committee members include representatives from government (Executive agency leaders, Governor’s office, Legislature), private industry (health insurance and health care), and consumer advocacy groups (individual and small business). An orientation was held in April and the Steering Committee meets monthly to discuss planning/implementation issues, manage collaboration among the FFE planning efforts, provide active and visible leadership, approve or disapprove recommendations from the Plan Management or Consumer Assistance Advisory Committees to forward to the Commissioner, and xxxxxx support for FFE implementation and sustainability. First Data serves a facilitation role. Meetings are open and Interactive Video is used for distant participation. Monthly progress reports and meeting summaries can be found at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/. Six Workgroups 2011 Six workgroups each met monthly in 2011: Community Leaders, Consumers, Information Technology, Outreach/ Education/ Enrollment, Providers, and State Agencies. These groups chartered in April, 2011 to discuss issues, strategies, ...
Stakeholder Consultation. Developing a strong relationship with stakeholders is a vital component of a successful exchange. We have been building communications with stakeholders throughout the planning process, and we will continue to do so as we are moving into the development and design phase of the exchange. Washington State understands the critical nature of building an exchange that focuses on the needs of individuals and small businesses, as well as creating an environment that is desirable for insurance carriers, providers and brokers. We are proposing using establishment grant funding to continue to build a structure that welcomes the feedback of various stakeholders. We are proposing to hold another round of these meetings after the state’s legislation is passed to discuss the next steps represented by the new exchange law, as well as the approach this grant is taking. The stakeholders have already helped to inform this application and our proposed application. We would like to continue to use their feedback to help us going forward. Washington State is fortunate to have secured the transitional bridge waiver to receive federal matching funds for our Basic Health program. As part of that waiver, we have the opportunity to use that program as a demonstration to prepare for the transition to 2014. One of the requirements for the waiver is to identify a process for defining documentation for an American Indian/Native American individual. This definition will be needed for those AI/NAs coming into the exchange, and this gives us the opportunity to address this earlier than perhaps we might have otherwise. We will work closely with our partners in Medicaid and AIHC, who have together developed a work group to address the definitions. This will ensure the definitions and processes will work for the exchange moving forward. In addition, Washington State is planning on engaging in formal Consultation with the 29 Tribes. This will provide us with feedback from the leaders of the Tribes and demonstrate our commitment to working together to ensure the exchange works for American Indians. We will also send any documents, materials or updates on the exchange to the 29 Tribes to ensure they are receiving information directly from the state, as well as from AIHC. We feel this multi-faceted approach addresses both the formal Consultation process, while also interacting on a more detailed level to ensure the Tribes are part of the exchange development process.
Stakeholder Consultation. A key element of the work of the project included consultation with stakeholders. This was achieved through the use of an internet consultation and through meetings.
Stakeholder Consultation. Section 1311(d)(6) of the Affordable Care Act requires that each Exchange consult with a variety of key stakeholders in the planning, establishment and ongoing operation of Exchanges. For example, Stakeholder input should be considered in the development of legislative options and drafts of enabling legislation, Exchange design and approach, and Exchange operational issues, among numerous other topics, including coordination with State health information exchanges. Successful Exchanges will undertake multi-faceted outreach to inform the public of their services and coverage options and will work closely with a variety of stakeholders including, but not limited to advocates for consumers, patients, employees, unemployed individuals, self employed individuals, and other consumers likely to be Exchange enrollees as well as consumers likely to be eligible for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions, representatives of small businesses, health insurance issuers, State HIT Coordinators, State Medicaid offices, State human services agency, and health care providers. In the spirit of Executive Order 13175 the Secretary is anticipating requiring each State that has one or more federally recognized Tribe(s) located within its borders to provide documentation that it has (1) established a process of consultation with such Tribe(s) regarding the start up and ongoing operation of the Exchanges; (2) implemented that process; and (3) assurance that it will continue to conduct and document such Tribal consultations for Exchange matters. Further guidance will be provided on this and other Indian specific issues. States are encouraged to review and adapt to procedures for State Medicaid consultation. States have the option to subcontract with Tribes for activities related to their grant. Please clearly identify funding set aside for such consultation in the budget narrative.
Stakeholder Consultation. The Exchange Board is committed to transparency and accountability. As stated above, the Exchange structure, with a public Board subject to state open meeting laws has built in opportunities for stakeholder involvement. The Level I grant will enhance the state’s ability to provide regular forums, supported group meetings and planning sessions to enable more rigorous input from diverse stakeholders. During the period of the Level I grant California will implement the following strategies for stakeholder consultation: ■ Planning groups organized by key issue and project during the development of the business and operational plan; ■ Specifications in all Exchange scopes of work requiring contracting consultants to include and manage a stakeholder process on the specific issue or topic they are reviewing, including identifying the appropriate stakeholders for the topic in consultation with Exchange staff; ■ Webinars, conference calls and other electronic and in-person means to solicit input from a wide and diverse set of stakeholders, including up to five Board meetings or other stakeholder meetings to be held outside of Sacramento with opportunities to receive input from the public and community stakeholders throughout the state; ■ Regular one-on-one meetings between individual and organizational stakeholders, Board members and staff, consistent with public meeting laws, as issues arise; and ■ Sensitivity throughout these activities to linguistic and cultural diversity among partners, stakeholders and potential Exchange enrollees. During the Level I grant, the Exchange will contract with consultants to assist and facilitate stakeholder meetings as issues arise and will also contract for consultants to develop and recommend to the Board specific strategies and approaches to maximize stakeholder input over the long-term operation of the Exchange. The California Exchange will engage in consultation with federally recognized Indian tribes in a manner similar to the process adopted and approved by CMS in California’s Medicaid state plan. California’s Indian health care delivery system consists of a network of primary care clinics funded by the federal Indian Health Services to provide care to American Indians and other underserved populations identified in the clinic charter/mission. There are seven urban Indian health programs operated by non-profit Boards of Directors, and 31 tribally operated health programs, currently participating in the Medi-Cal program. The...
Stakeholder Consultation. In the development of the Youth Attainment and Transitions Website and any other related communications activities the Commonwealth through DEEWR will collaborate with States and Territories via the multilateral governance group established to oversee the development, implementation and ongoing management of all elements of the National Partnership (further detail outlined below). Where appropriate the Commonwealth may also consult with other relevant peak groups and key stakeholders in the development and implementation communications activities. The Commonwealth and State and Territory Governments will have joint responsibility for overseeing the development, implementation and ongoing management of all elements of the Youth Attainment and Transitions National Partnership. This will be achieved across three governance structures, as follows:
Stakeholder Consultation. The California Exchange retains a firm and unwavering commitment to robust stakeholder consultation and active engagement in all aspects of Exchange programs. Stakeholder consultation is built in to the Exchange planning and program processes in all core areas. During the period of the Level I grant (1.2), the California Exchange will employ all of the strategies implemented in Level I (1.1) including: Hosting public Board meetings subject to state open meeting laws and public comment opportunities; Posting all materials and background on issues before the Exchange on the public Exchange website, including public and stakeholder reports and comments received; Providing updates on Exchange activities and opportunities for stakeholder feedback and input via an email distribution list; Engaging in Tribal consultation; Hosting one-on-one and small group meetings with stakeholders, experts and state partner agencies; and Convening topic-specific statewide ad hoc meetings, webinars and local listening sessions. In addition, for the period of the Level I grant (1.2) the California Exchange will finalize and implement a comprehensive stakeholder consultation plan that includes several standing advisory committees to focus on discrete issue areas such as: health plan management, communications and outreach and the SHOP Exchange. During this grant period, the California Exchange will also initiate discussions with tribal organizations to develop and adopt a formal tribal consultation policy.
Stakeholder Consultation. In the 2008-2009 school year, the District underwent an extensive process to develop a long-term strategic plan for both the educational and operational aspects of the School District. The educational plan focuses on what students, staff, parents and the community believe is most important in education. The operational plan focuses on creating efficiencies in order to make the necessary changes to improve student achievement, given the projected decline in enrolment and increased costs of operating. In the 2009-2010 school year, the District underwent further consultation, addressing each of the stakeholder groups in seven communities. The Board of Education is currently in the process of developing goals and setting a strategic direction for the District, both educationally and operationally. This plan takes the stakeholder consultation, operational efficiencies and budgetary constraints into consideration to determine sustainable, educationally sound plans for the next ten years. •AXIS Family Resources •Big Brothers and Sisters •Boys and Girls Club •Canadian Mental Health Association •Child Development Centre •Communities That Care •Denisiqi Services Society •Early Childhood Networks/ Tables •Family Enrichment Centre •First Nations Education Council •Friendship Centre •Interdisciplinary Child and Youth Teams •Interior Health •Knucwentwecw Society •Ministry for Children and Family Development •PAC and SPC •Parents •RCMP •Social Planning Councils •Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx University •Three Corners Health •University of Northern BC •Women's Contact Centre Community Supports •Aboriginal Enhancement Plan •Career Programs Coordinator •Community Literacy Plan •CommunityLINK Programs •Comprehensive SChool Health •District Literacy Framework •District Teacher Leaders •Early Learning Initiatives •Professional Learning Communities •Reading Strategies •Student Support Services •This District Plan •Vulnerable Student Supports District Supports •Altnernate and Transition Programs •Building Resilient Learners Plan: A •First Nations language, culture, liaison, classroom support •Learning Community, Reading Strategies, Learning Support and English as a Second Dialect/Language Teachers School Supports
Stakeholder Consultation. The procedure will be consulted with JCC colleagues, before submission to the Policies and Procedures Review Committee for approval.
Stakeholder Consultation. The INTAROS Stakeholder Task Team has in 2020-21 focused on: • Successful dialog meetings were performed with 12 European Research Infrastructures revealing a good insight in their Arctic engagement, strategies and priorities for in situ observation, data management, focus on best practices, technology development, cooperation and coordination among themselves, funding situation and willingness to engage in future Arctic Observing System. • More than 100 sensor and instrument manufacturers were invited to respond to a web-based technology survey – disappointingly on 16 companies responded. The survey showed that there are a group of sensor and instrument manufacturers that have experience, capability and interest in participating in innovation of new technology in the harsh Arctic environment. • The marine and maritime management authorities expressed great interest in gaining environmental data from the Arctic region. Especially timeseries and trends are of importance, but also data in support of reliable ecosystem modelling was highlighted Details can be found in: xxxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxx.xx/sites/xxxxxxx.xxxxx.xx/files/D1.7%20Stakeholder%20activities%20year%204- 5-Final-sub.pdf INTAROS launched in August a Revised Requirement Report aiming at: • Capitalise on INTAROS achievements • Take note of recently articulated user need from the EU and international organisations • Define more concrete requirements for the identified essential variables • Address gaps in the present observing system Requirements for in situ observations address resolution in space and time, quality and timeliness. Users of data generally have clearly articulated needs for time resolution, quality and timeliness, while defining the spatial resolution gives rise to serious considerations because: • There is a need to find a balance between what ideally would be “nice to have” and what is feasible to achieve from a technical, logistic and especially economic point of view • There is still a debate among scientists on how to address the spatial resolution: o A gridded format with fixed horizontal and vertical distances between observation points o Identifying key location with great impact and representativeness Requirements for atmospheric, ocean and land essential variables has been identified and discussed using the WMO OSCAR and Copernicus Systems – both using a gridded approach – as a baseline for a critical review. The performed requirement and gap analysis results in the following ...
