Public Interest Determination. Entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest. The parties have complied with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16, including making copies available to the public of this Final Judgment, the Competitive Impact Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States’s responses to comments. Based upon the record before the Court, which includes the Competitive Impact Statement and any comments and response to comments filed with the court, entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest. Date:llllllll Court approval subject to procedures of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16. lllllllllllllllllll United States District Judge. United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. and Bowater Incorporated, Defendants; Case No.:llll. Case: 1:07–cv–01912, Assigned To: Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx X., Assign Date: 10/23/2007, Description: Antitrust. Plaintiff United States of America (‘‘United States’’), pursuant to section 2(b) of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (‘‘APPA’’ or ‘‘Xxxxxx Act’’), 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), files this Competitive Impact Statement relating to the proposed Final Judgment submitted for entry in this civil antitrust proceeding.
I. Nature and Purpose of the Proceeding
Public Interest Determination. 14. The Minister shall consider the following when determining whether the adverse effects within federal jurisdiction and the adverse direct or incidental effects are, in light of the factors referred to in the IAA and the extent to which those effects are significant, in the public interest – or when referring this determination to the Governor in Council:
(a) the impact assessment report, including the proposed potential conditions and recommended conclusions;
(b) the views of the Cree Nation Government and the Impacted Cree First Nations; and
(c) the implementation of any mitigation measures to address such effects, having regard to items (a) and (b).
15. If the Joint Committee members cannot agree on the recommended conclusions as to the extent of the adverse effects within federal jurisdiction and the adverse direct or incidental effects and the extent to which those effects are significant, the Joint Committee shall meet with the President of the Agency and the Executive Director of the Cree Nation Government with a view to seeking consensus before finalizing the impact assessment report.
16. If the Joint Committee members are unable to reach consensus, they shall ensure that any non- consensus views are clearly and fairly articulated in decision materials submitted to the Minister.
17. The Minister shall provide the Cree Nation Government with written reasons for the determination made by the Minister under subsection 60(1) or section 62 of the IAA, including, if applicable, an explanation as to why certain views of the Cree Nation Government cannot be accommodated.
Public Interest Determination. Entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest. The parties have complied with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16, including making copies available to the public of this Final Judgment, the Competitive Impact Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States’s responses to comments. Based upon the record before the Court, which includes the Competitive Impact Statement and any comments and response to comments filed with the Court, entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest.
Public Interest Determination. Entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest. The parties have complied with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16, including making copies available to the public of this Final Judgment, the Competitive Impact Statement, and any comments thereon and the United States’s responses to comments. Based upon the record before the Court, which includes the Competitive Impact Statement and any comments and response to comments filed with the Court, entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest. Date: llllllllllllllll Court approval subject to procedures of Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16. lllllllllllllllllll United States District Judge [FR Doc. 2014–18744 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am] In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 7, 2012, applicable to workers of Bay Area News Group East Bay, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of California Newspapers Partnership, Walnut Creek, California. The Department’s notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on August 23, 2012 (Volume 77 FR page 51066). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers’ firm is engaged in activities related to the production of newspapers. The worker group is engaged in advertisement production, including graphic design. New information from the company revealed that the subject firm has relocated from 0000 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx, California to 000 Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the firm who were adversely affected by a shift in production of newspapers to a foreign country. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to also include the workers of 000 Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–81,756 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Bay Area News Group East Bay, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of California Newspapers Partnership, 0000 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx and 000 Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 15, 2011 through August 7, 2014, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of ...
Public Interest Determination. Not withstanding the provisions of § 200.402
(a) (concerning the closing of Commis sion meetings), but subject to the pro visions of § 200.409(a) (respecting the right of certain persons to petition for the closing of a Commission meeting), the Commission may conduct any meet ing or portion of a meeting in public where the Commission determines, in its discretion, that the public interest rend ers it appropriate to open such a meeting.
Public Interest Determination. The Secretary shall make the public interest determination under subsection (a) sepa- rately for each proposed project to be undertaken within the bound- aries described in subsection (a), using reasonable discretion, not later than 150 days after the date of submission of appropriate plans for the proposed project.
