Renewal Review Process Sample Clauses

Renewal Review Process. The School shall be subject to a rigorous, objective evaluation process in order to renew this Contract. The Renewal Review Process shall occur in the final school year of the current term of this Contract. Such process shall include multiple measures of progress towards the Performance Objectives as well as compliance with the other terms and requirements of this Contract. The School shall be required to submit a renewal application as part of such process, in form and substance acceptable to the District. In addition, the School may be required to participate in review meetings, discussions, and/or school visits conducted by the District. Schools rated as “Accredited on Watch,” “Accredited on Priority Watch,” or “Accredited on Probation” on the DPS School Performance Framework must meet the mutually agreed upon performance benchmarks in their entirety (if applicable), as determined by the District, and also demonstrate a capacity for ongoing school improvement in order to receive a contract renewal.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Renewal Review Process. Each School shall be subject to a rigorous, objective evaluation process in order to renew its school attachment approval. The Renewal Review Process shall occur in the final school year of the current term of the previous resolution of approval. Such process shall include multiple measures of progress towards the Performance Objectives as well as compliance with the other terms and requirements of this Contract. The Network shall be required to submit a renewal application for the School as part of such process, in form and substance acceptable to the District. In addition, the Network may be required to participate in review meetings, discussions, and/or school visits conducted by the District. Schools rated as “Accredited on Watch,” “Accredited on Priority Watch,” or “Accredited on Probation” on the DPS School Performance Framework must meet the mutually agreed upon performance benchmarks in their entirety (if applicable), as determined by the District, and also demonstrate a capacity for ongoing school improvement in order to receive a contract renewal.
Sample 1Sample 2
Renewal Review Process. The School shall be subject to a rigorous, objective evaluation process in order to renew this Contract. The Renewal Review Process shall occur in the final school year of the term of this Contract. Such process shall include multiple measures of progress towards the Performance Objectives (cited in Section
Sample 1Sample 2
Renewal Review Process. The School shall be subject to a rigorous, objective evaluation process in order to renew this Contract. The Renewal Review Process shall occur in the final school year of the current term of this Contract. Such process shall include multiple measures of progress towards the Performance Objectives (cited in Section 11.A and 11.B of this Contract) as well as compliance with the other terms and requirements of this Contract. The School shall be required to submit a renewal application as part of such process, in form and substance acceptable to the District. In addition, the School may be required to participate in review meetings, discussions, and/or school visits conducted by the District. Schools rated as “Accredited on Watch,” “Accredited on Priority Watch,” or “Accredited on Probation” on the DPS School Performance Framework must meet the mutually agreed upon performance benchmarks identified in 11.A in their entirety (if applicable), as determined by the District, and also demonstrate a capacity for ongoing school improvement in order to receive a contract renewal.
Sample 1
Renewal Review Process. Each School shall be subject to a rigorous, objective evaluation process in order to renew its school attachment approval. The Renewal Review Process shall occur in the final school year of the current term of the previous resolution of approval. Such process shall include multiple measures of progress towards the Performance Objectives as well as compliance with the other terms and requirements of this Contract. The Network shall be required to submit a renewal application for the School as part of such process, in form and substance acceptable to the District. The District shall only consider the final State SPF rating for the School. In addition, the Network may be required to participate in review meetings, discussions, and/or school visits conducted by the District. Schools rated as “Improvement,” “Priority Improvement,” “Turnaround,” or “Insufficient Data'' on the Colorado School Performance Framework must meet the mutually agreed upon performance benchmarks in their entirety (if applicable), as determined by the District, and also demonstrate a capacity for ongoing school improvement in order to receive a contract renewal. If these benchmarks are not met, the determination of whether the school is making adequate progress will be determined through the renewal process. The District shall comply with C.R.S. § 22-30.5-110 and all other provisions of the Charter Schools Act regarding renewal, non-renewal, and revocation.
Sample 1

Related to Renewal Review Process

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • REVIEW OF WORK The Consultant shall permit the City, its agents and/or employees to review, at any time, all work performed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement at any stage of the work;

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Scope of Work For the 2022/2023 Grant Period, the Provider will maintain a victim services program that will be available to provide direct services to victims of crime who are identified by the Provider or are presented to the Provider, as specified in the Provider’s 2022/2023 Grant Application as approved by the OAG and incorporated herein by reference.

  • Annual Review The Board of Directors during the Contract Period shall review annually, or at more frequent intervals which the Board of Directors determines is appropriate, the Executive’s compensation and shall award the Executive additional compensation to reflect the Executive’s performance, the performance of the Company and competitive compensation levels, all as determined in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

  • Training Plan 19.6.1 An apprentice shall be a party to an individual Training Plan. 19.6.2 The Training Plan sets out the training that the apprentice will do both on – the – job and off – the – job. The Training Plan also sets out how the Registered Training Organisation (RTO) will ensure the apprentice will receive quality training – both on – the – job and off – the – job. 19.6.3 The Training Plan reflects the choices made by the employer and the apprentice in relation to:-

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!