School Performance Framework Sample Clauses

School Performance Framework a. The AUTHORIZER has developed Academic and Operational scorecards to measure the CHARTER SCHOOL’s performance. The scorecards shall collectively constitute the AUTHORIZER’s School Performance Framework (hereinafter, the “FRAMEWORK”), which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated into this Agreement by reference. The CHARTER SCHOOL shall annually Meet Expectations on the FRAMEWORK. The FRAMEWORK shall supersede and replace any and all assessment measures, educational goals and objectives, financial operations metrics, and organizational performance metrics set forth in the Application and not explicitly incorporated into the FRAMEWORK. The specific terms, form and requirements of the FRAMEWORK, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are determined by the AUTHORIZER and will be binding on the CHARTER SCHOOL. b. The AUTHORIZER shall monitor and periodically report on the CHARTER SCHOOL’s progress in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set out in the FRAMEWORK. Such reporting shall take place at least annually. c. The CHARTER SCHOOL’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the FRAMEWORK shall provide the basis upon which the AUTHORIZER will decide whether to renew the CHARTER SCHOOL at the end of the Charter term or upon the 5-year review. d. The Parties intend that, where this Charter references or is contingent upon state or federal accountability laws, that the CHARTER SCHOOL be bound by any applicable laws, or modification or amendments to such laws, upon the effective date of said laws, or any modifications or amendments thereto. The specific terms, form and requirements of the FRAMEWORK may be modified or amended to the extent required to align with changes to applicable state or federal accountability requirements, as set forth in law. In the event that any such modifications or amendments are required, the AUTHRIZER will use its best efforts to apply such expectations for charter school performance in a manner consistent with those set forth in the FRAMEWORK initially established in the Charter. e. In addition to any requirements set forth in the FRAMEWORK, AUTHORIZER may designate an AUTHORIZER representative or representatives to enter the premises of CHARTER SCHOOL during or outside of school hours, on a scheduled or unscheduled basis, to monitor whether SPONSOR is operating CHARTER SCHOOL in compliance with applicable law and with the terms a...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
School Performance Framework. The School Performance Framework will be a part of the basis, along with the requirements of 70 O.S. § 3-137 (B), (C) & (D), upon which the SBE will decide whether to renew the Contract at the end of its term. The SBE shall comply with the Act’s requirements on charter renewals.
Sample 1Sample 2
School Performance Framework a. Annually, the School and Commission must set performance targets designed to help the School meet applicable federal, state, and Commission expectations. Once agreed upon, those performance targets shall be incorporated into the contract through amendment. b. The School shall annually Meet Standards or Exceed Standards on the Commission’s Charter School Performance Framework set out in chapter 108-30 WAC, the requirements contained in chapter 28A.710 RCW, and the School specific performance measures, in Appendix 7, and as set out in this Contract. The parties recognize that the specific indicators, measures, metrics, and targets associated with the Performance Framework are in the process of being established. In developing these indicators, measures, metrics, and targets the Commission will obtain input from stakeholders including, at a minimum, Schools with whom it has a contract. Ultimate authority for defining specific terms, form and requirements of the Performance Framework, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, is retained by the Commission and will be binding on the School. c. The Commission will monitor and periodically report on the School’s progress in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set out in the Performance Framework. Such reporting will take place at least annually in the format specified by the Commission. d. The School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in chapter 108-30 WAC, the requirements contained in chapter 28A.710 RCW, and the School specific performance measures set out in this Contract shall provide one basis upon which the Commission will base its decisions to renew, revoke, terminate or take other action on the Contract. e. The Parties intend that, where this Contract references or is contingent upon state or federal laws, that they be bound by any applicable modification or amendments to such laws upon the effective date of said modifications or amendments. The specific terms, form and requirements of the Performance Framework may be modified or amended to the extent required to align with changes to applicable state or federal accountability requirements, as set forth in law. In the event that any such modifications or amendments occur, the Commission will use best efforts to apply expectations for school performance in a manner consistent with those set forth in the Performance Framework as initially established in the ...
Sample 1
School Performance Framework. In conducting its annual review of each School’s performance, the District will consider the School’s results on the School Performance Framework. The School Performance Framework measures a School’s attainment on the four key performance indicators identified in the Education Accountability Act of 2009 (article 11 of title 22): Academic Achievement: The Academic Achievement Indicator reflects how a School's students are doing at meeting the state's proficiency goal: the percentage of students who met or exceeded expectations on Colorado's standardized assessments. Academic Growth: The Academic Growth Indicator reflects academic progress using the Colorado Growth Model. This Indicator reflects 1) normative growth: how the academic progress of the students in this School compared to that of other students statewide with a similar state assessment score history in that subject area, and 2) adequate growth: whether this level of growth was adequate for the typical (median) student in this School to reach proficiency in three years or by the 10th grade, whichever comes first, as measured by the state assessment. Academic Growth Gaps: The Academic Growth Gaps Indicator reflects the academic progress of historically disadvantaged student subgroups and students below proficient. It disaggregates the Growth Indicator into student subgroups, and reflects their normative and adequate growth. The subgroups include students eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch, minority students, students with disabilities (IEP status), English Language Learners, and students who scored at the below proficient level. Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness: The Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness Indicator reflects the preparedness of students for college or jobs upon graduation. This Indicator reflects student graduation rates, dropout rates, and average Colorado ACT composite scores in 2016 and the average Colorado SAT composite scores in 2017. Based on State identified measures and metrics, Schools receive a rating on each of these performance indicators that evaluates if they have exceeded, met, approached, or not met the state’s expectations. These performance indicators are then combined to arrive at an overall evaluation of a School’s performance.
Sample 1
School Performance Framework. In collaboration with OP, the District Superintendent or designee shall develop a School Performance Framework (“SPF”) by which all charter schools, including the School, and programs will be evaluated for purpose of progress monitoring. The metrics specified in the SPF will be congruent the outcome goals specified in Addendum A-3. The SPF will inform District decisions related to campus replacement, restart, or closure; however, the Parties agree that failure to satisfy metrics established by the SPF is not a permissible basis for termination of this Agreement and that OP’s rights under this contract may not be abridged as a consequence of such failure. Rather, Paragraphs 4.05 and 4.06 provide the exclusive bases on which the District may unilaterally terminate this Agreement.
Sample 1
School Performance Framework. The performance provisions of this contract are based on a performance framework that clearly sets forth the academic and operational performance indicators, measures, and metrics that will guide the Commission’s evaluations of each public charter school. In addition to state and federal accountability standards, the performance framework should include specific provisions, indicators, measures, and metrics for: • Student academic proficiency, which includes, but is not limited to, performance on state standardized assessments. • Student academic growth, which includes, but is not limited to, performance on state standardized assessments. • Achievement gaps in both proficiency and growth between major student subgroups. • Attendance. • Recurrent enrollment from year to year. • Postsecondary readiness for high school. • Financial performance and sustainability. • Governing Board performance and stewardship, including compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and terms of the charter contract. The performance framework requires the disaggregation of all student performance data by major student subgroups (including gender, race, poverty status, special education status, English learner status, and gifted status). The Commission shall have the authority to collect, analyze, and report all data from state assessments for the School’s students in accordance with the performance framework. The parties acknowledge and agree that the education records of students enrolled in a School are governed by the requirements of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”), 20 U.S.C. §1232g, and its corresponding regulations. The parties will safeguard personally identifiable information from education records in their possession by developing and adhering to data governance procedures that safeguard against unauthorized access or disclosure of such records in accordance with said law.
Sample 1
School Performance Framework. The performance provisions of this contract are based on a performance framework that clearly sets forth the academic and operational performance indicators, measures, and metrics that will guide the Commission’s evaluations of each public charter school. In addition to state and federal accountability standards, the performance framework should include specific provisions, indicators, measures, and metrics for: See Application, pages 28 – 33, including Attachment #3. • Student academic proficiency, which includes, but is not limited to, performance on state standardized assessments. • Student academic growth, which includes, but is not limited to, performance on state standardized assessments. • Achievement gaps in both proficiency and growth between major student subgroups. • Attendance. • Recurrent enrollment from year to year. • Postsecondary readiness for high school. • Financial performance and sustainability. • Governing Board performance and stewardship, including compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and terms of the charter contract. The performance framework requires the disaggregation of all student performance data by major student subgroups (including gender, race, poverty status, special education status, English learner status, and gifted status). Where the framework has not yet been developed, another approach is to include language along the lines of the following: A set of performance frameworks (singularly, “Performance Framework,” and collectively, the “Performance Frameworks”), shall be incorporated into the Charter as an exhibit. The Performance Frameworks shall supersede and replace any and all assessment measures, education goals and objectives, financial operations metrics, and organization performance metrics set forth in the Application and not explicitly incorporated into the Performance Frameworks. The specific terms, form and requirements of the Performance Frameworks, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are maintained and disseminated by the Authorizer and will be binding on the School. Material amendments to the Performance Frameworks shall require approval by the Authorizer. The Commission shall have the authority to collect, analyze, and report all data from state assessments for the School’s students in accordance with the performance framework. The parties acknowledge and agree that the education records of students enrolled in a School are governed by the requirements of the F...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to School Performance Framework

  • KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • School Performance The School shall achieve an accountability designation of Good Standing or Honor on each of the three sections of the Performance Framework. In the event the School is a party to a third party management contract which includes a deficit protection clause, the School shall be exempt from some or all measures within the financial portion of the Performance Framework. In accordance with Charter School Law, the Authorizer shall renew any charter in which the public charter school met all of the terms of its performance certificate at the time of renewal.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P=Performance Indicator E=Explanatory Indicator M=Monitoring Indicator 2022/23 Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 ≥1 Total Margin (P) 0 ≥0 Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from Home and Community Care Support Services (HCCSS) Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a Quality and Resident Safety Indicators Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Annual Performance Bonus During the Employment Term, the Executive shall be entitled to participate in the STIP, with such opportunities as may be determined by the Chief Executive Officer in his sole discretion (“Target Bonuses”), and as may be increased (but not decreased, except for across-the-board reductions generally applicable to the Company’s senior executives) from time to time, and the Executive shall be entitled to receive full payment of any award under the STIP, determined pursuant to the STIP (a “Bonus Award”).

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!