Request for Input. The content of this document has been culled from literature and resources on the Internet. To anchor this in more than our own real life partnerships, we want you to be a part of this conversation! Please provide us with your feedback so we can improve this document to suit your needs by contacting Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx at Xxxxx.Xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx or Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx at Xxxxx.Xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx. If you want some direction for providing feedback, there is a document feedback form at the end of the document you can use. Thank You! Data Sharing: Creating Agreements Contents Request for Input 1 Background 3 Framework 5 The Data Life Cycle 6 Data Management Plan 7 Data Sharing Agreement 9 Element 1: Strong Partnership with Clear Communication 9 Element 2: Clear Process 10 Example Step-by-Step Process for Creating a Data Sharing Agreement 10 Element 3: Well-Developed Content 11 Annotated Bibliography of Resources 15 Agreement Templates 15 Data Management Plan Resources 16 Partnership Building Resources 17 References 18 Document Feedback Form 20 Data Sharing: Creating Agreements
Request for Input. 24.1 The Xxxxxxx Regional Education Association will be asked for input in an advisory capacity to help devise evaluation procedures that may be adopted by the school district.
Request for Input. This ANPRM seeks input on the following areas: OSHA’s triggers for medical removal of workers with elevated BLLs and their return to lead- exposed work; OSHA’s requirements for medical surveillance and management of lead-exposed employees; several additional provisions and compliance protocols that are undergoing public review in State Plans’ ongoing work to update their occupational lead standards; and the costs and effectiveness of lead exposure identification and control strategies. This Request for Input section includes a series of questions on the OSHA standards’ requirements and possible revisions to them, followed by a series of questions on employers’ requirements, which may in some cases be more protective than OSHA standards. While the questions pertaining to current requirements are primarily addressed to employers, OSHA will review and consider all information submitted in response to these questions. This section includes questions about several provisions of OSHA’s lead standards that are addressed in recent or proposed changes to State Plan lead standards in Michigan, Washington State, and California. As previously discussed, in January 2019 MIOSHA revised its lead standards for general industry and construction, changing the BLL at which an employee is required to be removed from lead exposure and the BLL at which an employee may be returned to lead exposure. Cal/OSHA has held advisory meetings to discuss a variety of potential changes to its lead standards and has published a draft of possible amendments to the existing regulations in general industry and construction operations. 6 7 Washington DOSH is also developing a variety of updates to DOSH’s occupational lead standards.8 For several lead standard provisions that State Plans have made or proposed changes to, this section describes the changes in the relevant State Plan(s) and requests input on whether similar revisions to federal lead standards should be considered. The State Plan changes and proposals include revisions to state blood lead triggers for medical removal protection and return to work; permissible exposure limits; and several ‘‘safe harbor’’ protocols that employers in certain industries, or who meet specified requirements, may opt to use as alternatives to complying with the main rule. Several questions in this section also relate to recommendations made by the 6 California’s most recent discussion draft and other materials related to the advisory meetings are availabl...
