Research-Based Instructional Strategies Sample Clauses

Research-Based Instructional Strategies. Developing instructional strategies and delivery that:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Research-Based Instructional Strategies. (RBISs)‌ RBISs are practices or pedagogies instructors may use that have been empirically shown to increase student learning. Numerous physics RBISs exist, including the Open Source Tutorials (Elby et al., 2008) and ISLE labs (Etkina & Heuvelen, 2001) used in UCF’s mini-studios. Additional RBISs are Peer Instruction (Xxxxx & Xxxxxx, 1999), Context-Rich Problems (X. Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxxx, 1992), and Interactive Lecture Demonstrations (Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx, 1997). For more examples of RBISs, see Table I of Henderson, Dancy, and Xxxxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxx’x study on the use of RBISs in introductory physics (2012).
Research-Based Instructional Strategies. Developing instructional strategies and delivery that: accommodate the emotional, cognitive, social and psychomotor needs of learners; increase the learner's ability to remember, connect, demonstrate, and apply what they have learned; are appropriate to the performance standards; increase the learner's ability to integrate what has been previously learned; provide knowledge of diverse cultures, knowledge of students' developmental levels and learning styles. Staff Development Assumptions: staff development supports student learning and achievement; staff development supports the alignment between student outcomes, curriculum, effective instruction and assessment; staff development activities will be conducted with minimal disruption in the learning process for students; staff development supports effective teaching and learning, effective organization development, leadership development and improvement of student performance based on individual school and District goals; staff development is based on current research about best practices and adult learning and encourages ongoing reflective practice and collegial support;

Related to Research-Based Instructional Strategies

  • Research Use The Requester agrees that if access is approved, (1) the PI named in the DAR and (2) those named in the “Senior/Key Person Profile” section of the DAR, including the Information Technology Director and any trainee, employee, or contractor1 working on the proposed research project under the direct oversight of these individuals, shall become Approved Users of the requested dataset(s). Research use will occur solely in connection with the approved research project described in the DAR, which includes a 1-2 paragraph description of the proposed research (i.e., a Research Use Statement). Investigators interested in using Cloud Computing for data storage and analysis must request permission to use Cloud Computing in the DAR and identify the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) or providers and/or Private Cloud System (PCS) that they propose to use. They must also submit a Cloud Computing Use Statement as part of the DAR that describes the type of service and how it will be used to carry out the proposed research as described in the Research Use Statement. If the Approved Users plan to collaborate with investigators outside the Requester, the investigators at each external site must submit an independent DAR using the same project title and Research Use Statement, and if using the cloud, Cloud Computing Use Statement. New uses of these data outside those described in the DAR will require submission of a new DAR; modifications to the research project will require submission of an amendment to this application (e.g., adding or deleting Requester Collaborators from the Requester, adding datasets to an approved project). Access to the requested dataset(s) is granted for a period of one (1) year, with the option to renew access or close-out a project at the end of that year. Submitting Investigator(s), or their collaborators, who provided the data or samples used to generate controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy and who have Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and who meet any other study specific terms of access, are exempt from the limitation on the scope of the research use as defined in the DAR.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Dissemination of Research Findings and Acknowledgement of Controlled-Access Datasets Subject to the NIH GDS Policy It is NIH’s intent to promote the dissemination of research findings from use of controlled-access dataset(s) subject to the NIH GDS Policy as widely as possible through scientific publication or other appropriate public dissemination mechanisms. Approved Users are strongly encouraged to publish their results in peer-reviewed journals and to present research findings at scientific meetings.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • Background and Instructions History of Agreement- This agreement has been drafted by the Texas Student Privacy Alliance (TXSPA). The Alliance is a collaborative group of Texas school districts that share common concerns around student and data privacy. The Texas K-12 CTO Council is the organization that sponsors the TXSPAand the TXSPA is the Texas affiliate of the national Student Data Privacy Consortium (SDPC). The SDPC works with other state alliances by helping establish common data privacy agreements unique to the jurisdiction of each state. This Texas agreement was drafted specifically for K-12 education institutions and included broad stakeholder input from Texas school districts, statewide associations such as TASB, TASA, and TASBO, and the Texas Education Agency. The purpose of this agreement is to set standards of both practice and expectations around data privacy such that all parties involved have a common understanding of expectations. This agreement also provides a mechanism (Exhibit E- General Offer of Terms) that would allow an Operator to extend the ability of other Texas school districts to be covered under the terms of the agreement should an Operator sign Exhibit E. This mechanism is intended to create efficiencies for both Operators and LEAs and generally enhance privacy practices and expectations for K-12 institutions and for companies providing services to K-12 institutions.

  • BOOKS AND INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS The total cost of books and instructional materials for school district students participating as part of this CCAP agreement will be borne by school district. COURSE NAME TEXT COST OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS COST

  • Additional Information for Product Development Projects Outcome of product development efforts, such copyrights and license agreements. • Units sold or projected to be sold in California and outside of California. • Total annual sales or projected annual sales (in dollars) of products developed under the Agreement. • Investment dollars/follow-on private funding as a result of Energy Commission funding. • Patent numbers and applications, along with dates and brief descriptions.  Additional Information for Product Demonstrations: • Outcome of demonstrations and status of technology. • Number of similar installations. • Jobs created/retained as a result of the Agreement.

  • Use of Project Development Security Buyer shall be entitled to draw upon the Project Development Security posted by Seller for Daily Delay Damages until such time as the Project Development Security is exhausted. Buyer shall also be entitled to draw upon the Project Development Security for any damages arising upon Buyer’s declaration of an Early Termination Date.

  • Curriculum and Instruction 7.1 The Board and the Association recognize the importance of adequate teaching reference materials and adequate and appropriate instructional materials and equipment in maintaining a high level of professional performance in the educational process.

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.