Termination and Results of Termination 24.1. Without prejudice to the Company’s rights under this Agreement to terminate it immediately without prior notice to the Client, each Party may terminate this Agreement by giving at least three (3) Business Days Written Notice to the other Party.
Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.
Financial Conditions Section 4.01. (a) The Recipient shall maintain or cause to be maintained a financial management system, including records and accounts, and prepare financial statements in a format acceptable to the Bank, adequate to reflect the operations, resources and expenditures in respect of the Project and each Sub-project (including its cost and the benefits to be derived from it).
Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).
Narrative Results i. A description of Xxxxxxx’x billing and coding system(s), including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing.
Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.
Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of the three Federal benefit programs that are the subject of this agreement: Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., (Xxxxxxxxxx GI Bill — Selected Reserve); Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. (Xxxxxxxxxx GI Bill — Active Duty); and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C. (Post-9/11 GI Bill). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guardsmen, reservists, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1. and 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Bill — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Bill — Selected Reserve, and the Post-9/11 GI Bill programs; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Bill — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Bill — Selected Reserve, and the Post-9/11 GI Bill program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last 26 years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer-based system of records. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically is minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in an estimated annual savings of $25,173,410 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $15,486,912. A cost-benefit analysis is provided at Attachment 1. In the 37 years since the inception of the first of these three Federal benefit programs, the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these programs have remained significant. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the large number of persons eligible for the three Federal benefit programs.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. The Recipient shall: • Develop a data collection plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect at least six months of data, including: o Throughput, usage, and operations data o Normal operating hours, up time, down time, and explanations of variations o Feedstock supply summary o Maximum capacity of the new fuel production system in diesel gallon equivalents (DGE) and ordinary units o Gallons of gasoline and/or diesel fuel displaced (with associated mileage information), along with value converted into DGE o Record of wastes from production processes (wastewater, solid waste, criteria emissions, etc.) o Expected air emissions reduction, for example: Non-methane hydrocarbons Oxides of nitrogen Non-methane hydrocarbons plus oxides of nitrogen Particulate Matter Formaldehyde o Duty cycle of the current fleet and the expected duty cycle of future vehicle acquisitions, if applicable o Specific jobs and economic development resulting from this project o Levelized cost of fuel and finished fuel price o Analysis of total facility costs, operation and maintenance costs, marginal abatement costs • Comply with the Petroleum Industry Information Reporting Act (PIIRA) and complete CEC Form M810E and CEC Form M13 on a monthly basis for submission to the California Energy Commission’s PIIRA Data Collection Unit. • Provide a written record of registering with the Low Carbon Fuel Standard and Renewable Fuel Standard programs. • Identify any current and planned use of renewable energy at the facility. • Describe any energy efficiency measures used in the facility that may exceed Title 24 standards in Part 6 of the California Code Regulations. • Provide data on potential job creation, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of expected future expansion. • Provide a quantified estimate of the project’s carbon intensity values or provide an Air Resources Board approved pathway carbon intensity. • Estimate annual life-cycle greenhouse gas emission reduction. • Compare any project performance and expectations provided in the proposal to Energy Commission with actual project performance and accomplishments. • Collect data, information, and analysis described above and include in the Final Report.
Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used: