We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Review Hearing Sample Clauses

Review Hearing. At the time and place set for the review hearing, the Owner shall be given an opportunity to be heard. If the City Manager finds, based upon substantial evidence, that the Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City Manager may recommend that the City Council terminate this Agreement notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, or modify this Agreement and impose such conditions as are reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the City. The decision of the City Council shall be final, subject only to judicial review pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5.
Review HearingThe teacher shall be granted a hearing with the- Board of Education to review the suspension unless the teacher agrees, in writing, to waive his/her right to such a hearing. Hearing dates shall be promptly scheduled. The teacher shall be given written notice of the time and place of the hearing at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the hearing, providing, however, that nothing herein shall require a delay of the implementation of the suspension pending such Board review.
Review Hearing. Within fifteen days after final decision or disagreement has been announced on any Grievance properly processed under the Grievance Procedure, either party shall notify the other party of its intent to submit the matter in dispute to an third party with AGREEMENT experience in grievance arbitration. In layoff grievances, the matter in dispute will be submitted to such party by mutual agreement only. The requesting party shall endeavour to schedule the hearing within ten days. The third party will convene a Hearing at which the parties will outline the cases to be presented at Arbitration, and will advise the parties of the decision that the third party will render as an Arbitrator on facts as presented. This opinion will be non-binding; but if the party to whom this opinion is adverse elects to continue to Arbitration, that party shall pay to the other party, in consideration of the estimated cost for two days of legal expenses, if the Arbitration Decision is also adverse. This review process shall be in parallel with, and shall not delay, arbitration of the matter.
Review HearingThe employee shall be granted a hearing before the Board of Education or a committee thereof to review the suspension if the employee makes a written request for such hearing to the Superintendent within five (5) days of receipt of the written notice of suspension. He/she shall have the right to be represented at the hearing by legal counsel or other representative, present witnesses on his behalf and cross-examine any witness who testifies against him/her. 13.4.4.1. Upon receipt of a request for a review hearing, a hearing date shall be promptly scheduled and the employee shall be given written notification of the time and place of the hearing at least seven (7) days prior to the review, as determined by the date of the notification letter. The notification shall set forth the procedure to be followed at the review hearing as stated below.
Review Hearing. Within fifteen days after a final decision or disagreement has been announced on any Grievance properly processed under the Grievance Procedure, either party shall notify the other party of its intent to submit the matter in dispute to an agreed third party with experience in grievance arbitration. In layoff grievances, the matter in dispute will be submitted to such third party by mutual agreement only. The requesting party shall endeavour to schedule the arbitration hearing within ten days. The third party will convene a Hearing at which the parties will outline the cases to be presented at Arbitration, and will advise the parties of the decision that the third party will render as an Arbitrator on facts as presented. n,, This opinion will be non-bindi but if the party to whom this opinion is adverse elects to continue to Arbitration, that party shall pay to the other party, in consideration of the estimated cost for two days of legal expenses, if the Arbitration Decision is also adverse.
Review Hearing. At the time and place set for the review hearing, the Owner shall be given an opportunity to be heard. If the Planning Commission finds, based upon substantial evidence, that the Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the Planning Commission may terminate this Agreement notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, or modify this Agreement and impose such conditions as are reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the City. The Owner may appeal any determination of the Planning Commission to the City Council in accordance with the City’s DHSMC. The decision of the City Council shall be final, subject only to judicial review pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5.

Related to Review Hearing

  • Hearing The grievance shall be heard by a single arbitrator and both parties may be represented by such person or persons as they may choose and designate, and the parties shall have the right to a hearing at which time both parties will have the opportunity to submit evidence, offer testimony, and make oral or written arguments relating to the issues before the arbitrator. The proceeding before the arbitrator shall be a hearing denovo.

  • Contractor Hearing Board 1. If there is evidence that the Contractor may be subject to debarment, the Department will notify the Contractor in writing of the evidence which is the basis for the proposed debarment and will advise the Contractor of the scheduled date for a debarment hearing before the Contractor Hearing Board. 2. The Contractor Hearing Board will conduct a hearing where evidence on the proposed debarment is presented. The Contractor and/or the Contractor’s representative shall be given an opportunity to submit evidence at that hearing. After the hearing, the Contractor Hearing Board shall prepare a tentative proposed decision, which shall contain a recommendation regarding whether the Contractor should be debarred, and, if so, the appropriate length of time of the debarment. The Contractor and the Department shall be provided an opportunity to object to the tentative proposed decision prior to its presentation to the Board of Supervisors. 3. After consideration of any objections, or if no objections are submitted, a record of the hearing, the proposed decision, and any other recommendation of the Contractor Hearing Board shall be presented to the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors shall have the right to modify, deny, or adopt the proposed decision and recommendation of the Contractor Hearing Board. 4. If a Contractor has been debarred for a period longer than five (5) years, that Contractor may after the debarment has been in effect for at least five (5) years, submit a written request for review of the debarment determination to reduce the period of debarment or terminate the debarment. The County may, in its discretion, reduce the period of debarment or terminate the debarment if it finds that the Contractor has adequately demonstrated one or more of the following: (1) elimination of the grounds for which the debarment was imposed; (2) a bona fide change in ownership or management; (3) material evidence discovered after debarment was imposed; or (4) any other reason that is in the best interests of the County. 5. The Contractor Hearing Board will consider a request for review of a debarment determination only where (1) the Contractor has been debarred for a period longer than five (5) years; (2) the debarment has been in effect for at least five (5) years; and (3) the request is in writing, states one or more of the grounds for reduction of the debarment period or termination of the debarment, and includes supporting documentation. Upon receiving an appropriate request, the Contractor Hearing Board will provide notice of the hearing on the request. At the hearing, the Contractor Hearing Board shall conduct a hearing where evidence on the proposed reduction of debarment period or termination of debarment is presented. This hearing shall be conducted and the request for review decided by the Contractor Hearing Board pursuant to the same procedures as for a debarment hearing. 6. The Contractor Hearing Board’s proposed decision shall contain a recommendation on the request to reduce the period of debarment or terminate the debarment. The Contractor Hearing Board shall present its proposed decision and recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors shall have the right to modify, deny, or adopt the proposed decision and recommendation of the Contractor Hearing Board.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Hearings Within the time period specified in Section 8.4(d), the matter shall be presented to the arbitrator at a hearing by means of written submissions of memoranda and verified witness statements, filed simultaneously, and responses, if necessary in the judgment of the arbitrator or both the parties. If the arbitrator deems it to be essential to a fair resolution of the dispute, live cross-examination or direct examination may be permitted, but is not generally contemplated to be necessary. The arbitrator shall actively manage the arbitration with a view to achieving a just, speedy and cost-effective resolution of the dispute, claim or controversy. The arbitrator may, in his or her discretion, set time and other limits on the presentation of each party's case, its memoranda or other submissions, and refuse to receive any proffered evidence, which the arbitrator, in his or her discretion, finds to be cumulative, unnecessary, irrelevant or of low probative nature. Except as otherwise set forth herein, any arbitration hereunder will be conducted in accordance with the CPR Rules for Non-Administered Arbitration of Business Disputes then prevailing (except that the arbitration will not be conducted under the auspices of the CPR and the fee schedule of the CPR will not apply). Except as expressly set forth in Section 8.8(b), the decision of the arbitrator will be final and binding on the parties, and judgment thereon may be had and will be enforceable in any court having jurisdiction over the parties. Arbitration awards will bear interest at an annual rate of the Prime Rate plus 2% per annum. To the extent that the provisions of this Agreement and the prevailing rules of the CPR conflict, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Arbitration Hearing An Arbitration Hearing will be held within thirty (30) days after the Administrative Conference if no discovery is taken, or within thirty (30) days after the close of discovery, unless all parties and the Panel agree to extend the Arbitration Hearing date, or unless the parties agree in writing to waive the Arbitration Hearing. The parties may mutually agree on the location of the Arbitration Hearing. If the parties fail to agree, the Arbitration Hearing shall be held in Chicago, Illinois, or at such other location determined by the Presiding Arbitrator to be most convenient to the participants. The Panel will determine the date(s) and time(s) of the Arbitration Hearing(s) after consultation with all parties and shall provide reasonable notice thereof to all parties or their representatives.

  • Final Approval Hearing “Final Approval Hearing” shall mean the hearing at which the Court will consider and finally decide whether to enter the Final Judgment.

  • Public Hearing If the Grantee fails to respond to the Violation Notice received from the Grantor, or if the default is not remedied within the cure period set forth above, the Board shall schedule a public hearing if it intends to continue its investigation into the default. The Grantor shall provide the Grantee at least twenty (20) days prior written notice of such hearing, which specifies the time, place and purpose of such hearing, notice of which shall be published by the Clerk of the Grantor in a newspaper of general circulation within the Grantor in accordance with subsection 15.8 hereof. At the hearing, the Board shall give the Grantee an opportunity to state its position on the matter, present evidence and question witnesses, after which it shall determine whether or not the Franchise shall be revoked. The public hearing shall be on the record and a written transcript shall be made available to the Grantee within ten (10) business days. The decision of the Board shall be made in writing and shall be delivered to the Grantee. The Grantee may appeal such determination to an appropriate court, which shall have the power to review the decision of the Board de novo. The Grantee may continue to operate the Cable System until all legal appeals procedures have been exhausted.

  • Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.