Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Awards (SoTLs). SoTLs recognize discovery, reflection, and 2537 using evidence-based methods to research effective teaching and student learning. While the 2538 implementation of SoTL outcomes may result in teaching excellence and increased teaching effectiveness, 2539 this award recognizes scholarly efforts beyond teaching excellence. The University shall make available up 2540 to five SoTL awards. 2541 (d) Applications for Incentive Awards. Applications shall be completed on-line. These awards shall be 2542 made according to the criteria or procedures listed on the Faculty Excellence website
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Awards (SoTLs). SoTLs use discovery, 95 reflection, and evidence-based methods to research effective teaching and student learning. While 96 the implementation of SoTL outcomes can result in teaching excellence and increasing teaching 97 effectiveness, this award recognizes not teaching excellence but scholarly efforts. For academic 98 year 2016-2017, the University shall make available up to ten (10) SoTL awards. The number of 99 SoTL awards shall decline by one per year to a new baseline of five SoTL awards is established in 100 the 2021-2022 academic year. 101 102 (d) Applications for Incentive Awards. Until the Office of Faculty Excellence is able 103 to make applications electronic, applications shall be compiled as follows:
(1) iIn a binder with a 1” diameter ring. Binder and divider pockets shall remain 105 empty. Applications shall include the sections listed below compiled on 8.5” x 11” paper, 12 point 106 font, and with 1” margins on all sides. 107 (2) Cover page, including name, job title, department, college, and duration 108 covered by the application. 109 (2)(3) Table of contents, with section numbers. 110 (3)(4) Only the relevant portion (i.e., teaching for TIP, research for RIA and SoTL, 111 and service for SPA) of theThe Annual Chair’s Evaluations or equivalent for the time period 112 represented in the application. The Department Chair shall provide the number of faculty evaluated 113 in each year during that time period, the number of faculty in each category (Outstanding, Above 114 Satisfactory, etc.), and the department/unit’s AESP. 115 (4)(5) A narrative limited to five pages that presents evidence of outstanding 116 achievements within the award program. The narrative may contain relevant materials associated 117 with an Annual Evaluation, as summarized in Article 10.1(d). Information may be summarized in 118 tables and figures. Additional materials (e.g., published works, images of artwork, audio files of 119 musical performances) may be referenced in the narrative and provided in appendices. 120 (5)(6) Appendices that verify information included in the narrative and must be cited 121 within itthat narrative.
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. (SoTL) human subject research conducted by Relying Institution for which Relying Institution submits an application under the “Broad SoTL Protocol” at the Reviewing Institution. This Agreement is effective upon the date of last signature and will remain effective for five (5) years at which time the Agreement may be renewed by both parties. The Reviewing IRB will follow the University of Maryland, College Park Human Research Protections Policies and Procedures for reporting its findings and actions to appropriate officials at the Relying Institution. Relevant minutes of IRB meetings will be made available to the Relying Institution upon request. The Relying Institution remains responsible for ensuring compliance with the Reviewing IRB determinations and with the terms of the Reviewing IRB OHRP-approved FWA. This document must be kept on file by both parties and provided to OHRP upon request. Agreed to by: Signature of Signatory Official (IRB): Date: Print Full Name: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx Institutional Title: Director – Human Research Protection Program Signature of Signatory Official (IRB): Date: Print Full Name: Institutional Title: APPENDIX A: Terms and Conditions