Sponsor’s Past Performance Sample Clauses

Sponsor’s Past Performance. The Sponsor, the Habitat Agency, is a JPA composed of the City of Gilroy, City of Xxxxxx Hill, City of San Xxxx, and County of Santa Xxxxx, and is governed by two decision-making bodies: a Governing Board and an Implementation Board. The Governing Board is composed of JPA elected officials. The Implementation Board is represented by all Habitat Plan Permittees, including the JPA Member jurisdictions plus Valley Water and Santa Xxxxx Valley Transportation Authority. The Habitat Agency is led by an Executive Officer and supported by staff including—but not limited to—a Program Manager, Land Management Specialist, Senior Conservation Biologist, and Management Budget Analyst. The Habitat Agency also engages the part-time services of support staff and consultants. The Habitat Agency oversees implementation of all aspects of the Habitat Plan, including planning, design, construction, monitoring, and reporting of Restoration activities undertaken in support of the Habitat Plan, and will oversee implementation of the ILF Program. Because the Habitat Agency is a relatively new entity (formed in 2013), as an agency, it has only a modest track record of Aquatic Resources mitigation accomplishments. Nonetheless, it has planned and implemented three Restoration projects in the past 5 years and is currently in planning for two additional projects to be in construction by 2023. In addition, the Habitat Agency has successfully implemented the Habitat Plan over the last 7 years, maintaining an annual budget of approximately $5M and tracking and reporting annually on countless criteria as required by the HCP/NCCP. Furthermore, the individuals comprising the Habitat Agency have extensive experience planning, designing, managing, and implementing Mitigation Projects. The Habitat Agency will operate the ILF Program, including the maintenance of site-specific ledgers and annual reporting requirements. The Sponsor will utilize its own experienced staff along as well as contract with experienced contractors to design, permit, construct, monitor, and maintain the mitigation sites enrolled in this ILF Program.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Sponsor’s Past Performance

  • Past Performance The Government will evaluate the contractor's performance on the NETCENTS-2 Orders provided in Exhibit B, CDRL B001. The PCO will determine the quality of the work performed based on an integrated assessment of data obtained in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS) and information obtained from Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with customers, program managers and/or contracting officers for NETCENTS-2 task orders. Based on the contractor performance records above, the PCO will determine if there is an expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the required efforts under the unrestricted Application Services contract.

  • Continuing Performance Each party is required to continue to perform its obligations under this contract pending final resolution of any dispute arising out of or relating to this contract, unless to do so would be impossible or impracticable under the circumstances.

  • OUTCOME IF GRANTEE CANNOT COMPLETE REQUIRED PERFORMANCE Unless otherwise specified in this Statement of Work, if Grantee cannot complete or otherwise comply with a requirement included in this Statement of Work, HHSC, at its sole discretion, may impose remedies or sanctions outlined under Contract Attachment C, Local Mental Health Authority Special Conditions, Section 7.09 (Remedies and Sanctions).

  • Excuse for Nonperformance or Delayed Performance Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, Contractor/Vendor shall not be in default by reason of any failure in performance of this contract in accordance with its terms (including any failure by Contractor/Vendor to make progress in the prosecution of the work hereunder which endangers such performance) if Contractor/Vendor has notified the Commission or designee within 15 days after the cause of the delay and the failure arises out of causes such as: acts of God; acts of the public enemy; acts of the State and any other governmental entity in its sovereign or contractual capacity; fires; floods; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; strikes or other labor disputes; freight embargoes; or unusually severe weather. If the failure to perform is caused by the failure of a subcontractor to perform or to make progress, and if such failure arises out of causes similar to those set forth above, Contractor/Vendor shall not be deemed to be in default, unless the services to be furnished by the subcontractor were reasonably obtainable from other sources in sufficient time to permit Contractor to meet the contract requirements. Upon request of Contractor, the Commission or designee shall ascertain the facts and extent of such failure, and, if such officer determines that any failure to perform was occasioned by any one or more of the excusable causes, and that, but for the excusable cause, Contractor’s progress and performance would have met the terms of the contract, the delivery schedule shall be revised accordingly, subject to the rights of the State under the clause entitled (in fixed-price contracts, “Termination for Convenience,” in cost-reimbursement contracts, “Termination”). (As used in this Paragraph of this clause, the term “subcontractor” means subcontractor at any tier).

  • Service Performance All Services provided by the Agency shall be performed in a diligent, safe, courteous, and timely manner in accordance with this Contract and the Associated federal requirements.

  • Excused Performance 6.1 Notwithstanding the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event, in which case Clause 17 will govern, BT will not be liable for any failure or delay to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement (including any of its obligations to meet any Service Levels) to the extent that BT’s failure or delay in performing arises as a result of:

  • Full Performance The Owner and the Contractor hereby agree to the full performance of the Contract Documents.

  • EVALUATING PERFORMANCE 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out -

  • Product Performance Contractor hereby warrants and represents that the Products acquired by the Authorized User under the terms and conditions of this Contract conform to the specifications, performance standards and documentation in the Authorized User Agreement., and the documentation fully describes the proper procedure for using the Products. Contractor further warrants and represents that if the Products acquired by the Authorized User pursuant to an Authorized User Agreement under this Contract include software application development, software application customization, software programming, software integration or similar items (“Software Deliverables”) then such Software Deliverables shall be free from defects in material and workmanship and conform with all requirements of the Contract and Authorized User Agreement for the warranty period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the completed project (“Project warranty period”). Contractor also warrants that the Products, in the form provided to the Authorized User, do not infringe any copyright, trademark, trade secret or other right of any third party.

  • POOR PERFORMANCE Authorized Users should notify NYSPro Customer Services promptly if the Contractor fails to meet the requirements of the contracts resulting from this solicitation. Performance which does not comply with requirements or is otherwise unsatisfactory to the Authorized User should also be reported to Customer Services: Office of General Services Tel: 000-000-0000 New York State Procurement Fax: 000-000-0000 Customer Services Email: xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxx.xx.xxx 00xx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, XX 00000

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!