Standard decisions Sample Clauses

Standard decisions. Unless stated otherwise in this Consortium Agreement, the General Assembly shall decide by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of the votes cast (abstentions not counting) for all decisions concerning the implementation of the Action and the execution of this Consortium Agreement, for the following matters: - Approval of management procedures (incl. Quality Management Plan, settlement of payments, reporting procedures, internal communication procedures); - Approval of procedures for dissemination and publication; - Approval of procedures for preparing the reporting required under the Grant Agreement; - Approval of annual reports to Commission; - Approval of settlement of payments; - Approval to grant specific Access Rights to Parties/Linked Third Parties providing subcontractors; - Decision to delegate additional responsibilities to those already planned in 6.5.3 to the Programme Management Office; - Decision on transfer of tasks of a Defaulting Party and cessation of a defaulting Party as set out in 4.2; - Decision on the consequences in case of a Force Majeure as set out in 5.5; Evolution of the Parties - Approval of a new Party to the Consortium and approval of the settlement on the conditions of the accession of such a new Party; - Withdrawal of a Party from the Consortium and approval of the settlement on the conditions of the withdrawal respecting legitimate interests of all Parties; - Identification of a breach by a Party of its obligations under this Consortium Agreement or the Grant Agreement; - Declaration of a Party to be a Defaulting Party; - Remedies to be performed by a Defaulting Party; - Termination of a Defaulting Party’s participation in the Consortium and measures relating thereto - Proposal to the Commission for a change of the Coordinator; - Proposal to the Commission for suspension of all or part of the Action; - Proposal to the Commission for termination of the Action and the Consortium Agreement; Content, finances and intellectual property rights - Proposals of changes to Annex I and II of the Grant Agreement to be agreed by the Commission; - Approval of the Consortium Annual Work plan; - Modifications to Attachment 1 (Background Included); - Modifications to Attachment 7 (Internal funding rates) - Additions to Attachment 3 (List of Third Parties for simplified transfer according to Section 8.3.2). - Approval of non-disclosure agreement templates
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Standard decisions. With the exception of 1.2.6.2 (see below), the General Assembly shall decide by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of the votes cast (abstentions not counting) for all decisions, including but not limited to the following matters: Preparation and approval of the signature version of the Consortium Agreement Preparation and approval of the Grant Proposal
Sample 1

Related to Standard decisions

  • Impartial Decisions The Design Professional is the interpreter of the conditions of the Construction Contract and the judge of its performance, in the first instance. The Design Professional shall side neither with the Owner nor with the Contractor, but shall use its powers to enforce performance by both.

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when:

  • Written Decisions Decisions rendered at Level One which are unsatisfactory to the aggrieved person and all decisions rendered at Levels Two and Three of the grievance procedure shall be in writing setting forth the decision and the reasons therefore, and shall be transmitted promptly to all parties in interest and to the Association.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) The City and the Union encourage the use of the City’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Program or other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes to resolve non-contractual workplace conflicts/disputes. Participation in the program or in an ADR process is entirely voluntary and confidential.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Negotiation; Alternative Dispute Resolution The Parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to the performance of services under this Agreement. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute, then, pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Section 21.36, Contractor may submit to the Contracting Officer a written request for administrative review and documentation of the Contractor's claim(s). Upon such request, the Contracting Officer shall promptly issue an administrative decision in writing, stating the reasons for the action taken and informing the Contractor of its right to judicial review. If agreed by both Parties in writing, disputes may be resolved by a mutually agreed-upon alternative dispute resolution process. If the parties do not mutually agree to an alternative dispute resolution process or such efforts do not resolve the dispute, then either Party may pursue any remedy available under California law. The status of any dispute or controversy notwithstanding, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with the Agreement and the written directions of the City. Neither Party will be entitled to legal fees or costs for matters resolved under this section.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.