Studies and Analysis Which Provide the Basis for the PM&E Measure Sample Clauses

Studies and Analysis Which Provide the Basis for the PM&E Measure. In developing this PM&E measure and the Xxxxx Fork River Native Salmonid Restoration Plan (Restoration Plan) (Xxxxxxxxxxxx and Xxxxx 1998), the CFRT and the FWG developed, reviewed, and used a large number of fish resource and fish passage related studies, reports, and other information (e.g. as provided in memoranda or other communications by contractors/consultants to the group). These include WWP conducted or contracted studies of historic and current fish species occurrence and abundance (CES 1998a, 1998b; NDT 1994; Xxxxx and Xxxxxx 1993; WWP 1995a, 1995b, 1996a, 1996b), several of which focused specifically on adfluvial, native salmonid populations and their habitat (CES 1998b; Xxxxx and Xxxxxx, 1993; WWP 1996); numerous state and multi-agency reports specific to the restoration of bull trout in the Lake Pend Oreille-lower Xxxxx Fork River system (MBTSG 1996a; PBTTAT 1998), in other areas of the Xxxxx Fork River ( MBTSG 1996b, 1996c, 1996d), or for bull trout restoration in general terms in Idaho or Montana waters (State of Idaho 1996); an evaluation of the suitability of the lower Xxxxx Fork River as a migratory corridor for adfluvial species (Beak 1998); and a preliminary engineering assessment of the feasibility and potential options for providing fish passage at Cabinet Gorge Dam (Xxxxxxxxxxxx 1997a, 1997b). Identification and discussion of the fish passage issue began at the earliest stages of the Xxxxx Fork Collaborative Relicensing Process, including initial stage consultation comments, early NEPA scoping by FERC staff, and at the initial meetings of both the CFRT and FWG. Discussions of the issue have occurred at the majority of FWG meetings since. The FWG reached final consensus on the plan at their June 25, 1998 meeting, and approved recommending the PM&E measure for implementation to the CFRT.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Studies and Analysis Which Provide the Basis for the PM&E Measure. Most of the information providing the basis for this PM&E measure was provided to the FWG by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) personnel at work group meetings beginning in April of 1997. Related information on the current status of LPO- CFR bull trout populations and threats posed by intentional or incidental harvest and the effects of land use activities can be found in various state restoration plans (State of Idaho 1996), status reports (MBTSG 1997, PBTTAT 1998), and documents prepared by or for Washington Water Power (WWP 1996, Xxxxx and Xxxxxx 1993). In addition to the IDFG verbal descriptions of the magnitude and potential impacts to bull trout of illegal harvest based on the results of their current enforcement activities, they also showed the FWG a video (June 11-12, 1997 meeting) of an interview with an individual apprehended for illegal harvest (video property of IDFG, Boise, ID). That video confirmed their descriptions of the extent of such activities and the vulnerability of bull trout when in the spawning streams. IDFG also provided the FWG with cost projections for the anticipated program and was also able to secure matching funds for the first two years of this effort, beginning in 1998. The FWG agreed at it’s July 29-30, 1997 meeting that Idaho’s proposal to implement the program in 1998 should be forwarded to the Xxxxx Fork Relicensing Team (CFRT) as a recommended interim PM&E measure to be funded by WWP immediately. The CFRT accepted and approved the FWG recommendation (at the January 28-29, 1998 CFRT meeting) and WWP provided the two years of interim funding to Idaho Fish and Game as noted below. Later, the FWG approved this PM&E for developing and funding a longer term Bull Trout Protection and Public Education Project at their May 14, 1998 meeting as outlined below. Both Idaho and Montana have provided input into determining an adequate level of WWP funding to effectively implement the program within both states, which is also reflected below.
Sample 1
Studies and Analysis Which Provide the Basis for the PM&E Measure. Early in the consultation process, the FWG considered the potential mitigation benefits of protecting habitat and improving conditions in LPO-CFR tributary streams. Information on the positive results from local landowner and stakeholder driven Watershed Councils was presented to the FWG, and discussed at their April 30-May 1, 1997 and June 11-12, 1997 meetings (FWG meeting summaries). The success of The Elk Creek Watershed Council, a group active along a tributary to Cabinet Gorge Reservoir, was highlighted as a site-specific example of the benefits of such groups (pers. comm. of X. Xxxxxx, FWG member). Lack of initial financial resources and assistance was identified as an obstacle to the potential formation of additional Watershed Councils on those LPO-CFR tributaries where local interests are or would otherwise be supportive. The FWG agreed at it’s June 11-12, 1997 meeting to recommend to the Xxxxx Fork Relicensing Team (CFRT) a PM&E measure providing for support and/or facilitation of the formation of additional Watershed Councils along tributaries to the lower Xxxxx Fork River or Lake Pend Oreille.
Sample 1
Studies and Analysis Which Provide the Basis for the PM&E Measure. As noted above, although there has been a substantial focus on water quality conditions in the upper Xxxxx Fork River basin, relatively little data was available for waters in the project area prior to WWP’s investigations. Xxxxx and Xxxxx (1985) provides data on metals contamination in river sediments, including some sampling in the project reservoirs. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1992), Xxxxxx (1985, 1992), and Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx (1988) provide relatively recent summaries of the available information concerning water quality in the Montana portion of the Xxxxx Fork River, conclusions concerning the relative status of various portions of the river, and alternatives and plans for addressing water quality concerns. Most recently, WWP has contracted for or conducted several limnological studies during 1993 - 1995 (ND&T 1994; WWP 1995, 1996) that provide substantial new information on nutrients and productivity in the lower Xxxxx Fork River and also included some analysis of metals contamination in reservoir sediments and two tributary mouths (as background indicators) (ND&T 1994). Finally, as part of the collaborative consultation process, the Water Resources Work Group (WRWG) has obtained substantial additional analysis and evaluation of nutrient, productivity, and metals information from their consultants (Beak 1997, 1998; Xxxxx 1997; WRWG meetings, early 1997 through Dec. 9, 1997), and has continued to discuss these issues and appropriate measures for addressing them through their May 13, 1998 meeting. Specific to this protection, mitigation, and enhancement (PM&E) measure, the WRWG began discussing coordination of it’s monitoring needs with the activities of the Tri-State Implementation Council (TSIC) in early 1997 (WRWG Meeting Summary, April 10-11, 1997). The TSIC is an interstate body (Montana, Idaho, Washington) tasked with monitoring significant trends in the Xxxxx Fork - Pend Oreille watershed, with the goal of recommending measures to improve water quality. The TSIC was in the final stages of developing and implementing a Xxxxx Fork River Nutrients Monitoring Program, and was interested in the participation and support of the WRWG and WWP. Given similarity of data needs and a desire to avoid duplicative efforts, the WRWG requested the TSIC consider an additional sampling station to better define conditions in each of the two reservoirs and an expansion of their analysis on the lower river to include metals. The TSIC agreed to sampli...
Sample 1
Studies and Analysis Which Provide the Basis for the PM&E Measure. Water quality monitoring in 1994 indicated relatively high levels of phosphorus (i.e. nutrients) and phytoplankton production in Cabinet Gorge Reservoir during the September 1994 sampling (WWP 1995; Beak 1997). There was no clear explanation for these “elevated” levels (Beak Consultants, Inc. - X. Xxxxxxx pers. comm. to Water Resources Work Group [WRWG] at April 10-11, 1997 meeting). The WRWG discussed the potential for remobilization of sediment nutrients in Xxxxx Reservoir during periods of stratification (i.e. low oxygen conditions at deeper depths) as a possible causative factor. They also discussed the desirability of additional monitoring of Xxxxx Reservoir stratification and the associated conditions in the hypolimnion (e.g. near bottom). The WRWG also discussed at several meetings during 1997 the issue of metals accumulation in Xxxxx Reservoir sediments. They had a summary report prepared on available information for metals contamination in the lower Xxxxx Fork River and the potential influences of the projects (Xxxxx 1997). Following review of the available information and Xx. Xxxxx’x summary report, the WRWG identified the possibility that potential anoxic (i.e. low oxygen) conditions could result in the remobilization of sediment metals as an issue warranting further study. The WRWG had Xxx Xxxxxxx, Beak Consultants Inc. (Beak), develop a sampling protocol for evaluating the issue of nutrient and/or metals remobilization in Xxxxx Reservoir (WRWG meeting of September 11, 1997, October 23, 1997, and as agreed to on May 13, 1998). The WRWG agreed that evaluations during three years of stratified conditions would be sufficient to determine the effect of reservoir stratification.
Sample 1

Related to Studies and Analysis Which Provide the Basis for the PM&E Measure

  • Sampling and Analysis The Seller has sole responsibility for quality control of the coal and shall forward its “as loaded” quality to the Buyer as soon as possible. The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer and the results thereof shall be accepted and used for the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or using standards mutually acceptable to both parties. Samples for analyses shall be taken by any ASTM standards or standards mutually acceptable to both parties, and may be composited and shall be taken with a frequency and regularity sufficient to provide reasonably accurate representative samples of the deliveries made hereunder. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or mutually agreeable changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the time of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer; one (l) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary; one (1) part shall be retained by Buyer (LG&E) until the twenty-fifth (25th) of the month following the month of unloading (the “LG&E Disposal Date”) or Buyer (KU) until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (the “KU Disposal Date”), the LG&E Disposal Date and the KU Disposal Date are collectively the “Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date; and one part (“Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the tenth (10th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests a Referee Sample analysis before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder. The Monthly Weighted Averages shall be determined by utilizing the individual shipment analyses. If any dispute arises before the Disposal Date, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, a dispute shall be deemed not to exist and Buyer’s analysis shall prevail and the analysis of the Independent Lab shall be disregarded if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount equal to or less than: (i) 0.50% moisture (ii) 0.50% ash on a dry basis (iii) 100 Btu/lb. on a dry basis (iv) 0.10% sulfur on a dry basis. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount more than the amounts listed above, then the analysis of the Independent Lab shall prevail and Buyer’s analysis shall be disregarded. The cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by Seller to the extent that Buyer’s analysis prevails and by Buyer to the extent that the analysis of the Independent Lab prevails.

  • Certain Calculations and Tests (a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, but subject to Sections 1.10(b) and (c) and Section 1.11, all financial ratios and tests (including the Total Leverage Ratio, the First Lien Leverage Ratio, the Secured Leverage Ratio, the Interest Coverage Ratio and the amount of Consolidated Total Assets and Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA) contained in this Agreement that are calculated with respect to any Test Period during which any Subject Transaction occurs shall be calculated with respect to such Test Period and each such Subject Transaction on a Pro Forma Basis. Further, if since the beginning of any such Test Period and on or prior to the date of any required calculation of any financial ratio or test (i) any Subject Transaction has occurred or (ii) any Person that subsequently became a Restricted Subsidiary or was merged, amalgamated or consolidated with or into the Borrower or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or any joint venture since the beginning of such Test Period has consummated any Subject Transaction, then, in each case, any applicable financial ratio or test shall be calculated on a Pro Forma Basis for such Test Period as if such Subject Transaction had occurred at the beginning of the applicable Test Period (it being understood, for the avoidance of doubt, that solely for purposes of (x) calculating compliance with Section 6.12(a) and (y) calculating the First Lien Leverage Ratio for purposes of the definitions of “Applicable Rate” and “Commitment Fee Rate”, in each case, no Subject Transaction occurring after the end of the relevant Test Period shall be taken into account). (b) For purposes of determining the permissibility of any action, change, transaction or event that requires a calculation of any financial ratio or test (including, without limitation, Section 6.12(a), any First Lien Leverage Ratio test, any Secured Leverage Ratio test, any Total Leverage Ratio test and/or any Interest Coverage Ratio test, the amount of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and/or Consolidated Total Assets), such financial ratio or test shall be calculated at the time such action is taken (subject to Section 1.11), such change is made, such transaction is consummated or such event occurs, as the case may be, and no Default or Event of Default shall be deemed to have occurred solely as a result of a change in such financial ratio or test occurring after the time such action is taken, such change is made, such transaction is consummated or such event occurs, as the case may be. (c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, with respect to any amounts incurred or transactions entered into (or consummated) in reliance on a provision of this Agreement (including any covenant or the definition of “Incremental Cap”) that does not require compliance with a financial ratio or test (including, without limitation, Section 6.12(a), any First Lien Leverage Ratio test, any Secured Leverage Ratio test, any Total Leverage Ratio test and/or any Interest Coverage Ratio test) (any such amounts, the “Fixed Amounts”) substantially concurrently with any amounts incurred or transactions entered into (or consummated) in reliance on a provision of this Agreement (including any covenant or the definition of “Incremental Cap”) that requires compliance with a financial ratio or test (including, without limitation, Section 6.12(a), any First Lien Leverage Ratio test, any Secured Leverage Ratio test, any Total Leverage Ratio test and/or any Interest Coverage Ratio test) (any such amounts, the “Incurrence-Based Amounts”), it is understood and agreed that the Fixed Amounts shall be disregarded in the calculation of the financial ratio or test applicable to the Incurrence-Based Amounts.

  • Annual Reports on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria (a) On or before March 1 of each year commencing in March 2018, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Operating Advisor and, if it has made (or is required to make) an Advance during the applicable calendar year, the Trustee, each at its own expense, shall furnish (and each of the preceding parties, as applicable, (i) with respect to any Servicing Function Participant of such party that is a Mortgage Loan Seller Sub-Servicer, shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such Servicing Function Participant to furnish, and (ii) with respect to any other Servicing Function Participant of such party (other than any party to this Agreement), shall cause such Servicing Function Participant to furnish) (each Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Operating Advisor, any Servicing Function Participant and, if it has made (or is required to make) an Advance during the applicable calendar year, the Trustee, as the case may be, a “Reporting Servicer”) to the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, the Serviced Companion Loan Holders (or, in the case of a Serviced Companion Loan that is part of an Other Securitization Trust, the applicable Other Depositor and Other Exchange Act Reporting Party), the Operating Advisor (only in the case of a report furnished by the Special Servicer) and the Depositor, a report on an assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria (together with a copy thereof in XXXXX-Compatible Format, or in such other format as otherwise agreed upon by the Depositor, the Certificate Administrator, the applicable Other Depositor, the applicable Other Exchange Act Reporting Party and the applicable Certifying Servicer) that complies in all material respects with the requirements of Item 1122 of Regulation AB and contains (A) a statement by such Reporting Servicer of its responsibility for assessing compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, (B) a statement that such Reporting Servicer used the Servicing Criteria to assess compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, (C) such Reporting Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of the end of and for the preceding calendar year, including, if there has been any material instance of noncompliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, a discussion of each such failure and the nature and status thereof and (D) a statement that a registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on such Reporting Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of and for such period. Copies of all compliance reports delivered pursuant to this Section 10.09 shall be provided to any Certificateholder, upon the written request thereof, by the Certificate Administrator. Each such report shall be addressed to the Depositor and each Other Depositor (if addressed) and signed by an authorized officer of the applicable company, and shall address each of the Relevant Servicing Criteria specified on a certification substantially in the form of Exhibit O to this Agreement delivered to the Depositor on the Closing Date. Promptly after receipt of each such report, (i) the Depositor and each Other Depositor may review each such report and, if applicable, consult with the each Reporting Servicer as to the nature of any material instance of noncompliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, and (ii) the Certificate Administrator shall confirm that the assessments, taken individually address the Relevant Servicing Criteria for each party as set forth on Exhibit O to this Agreement and notify the Depositor of any exceptions. For the avoidance of doubt, the Trustee shall have no obligation or duty to determine whether any such report (other than any such report furnished by the Trustee or any Servicing Function Participant of the Trustee) is in form and substance in compliance with the requirements of Regulation AB. (b) On the Closing Date, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Trustee and the Operating Advisor each acknowledge and agree that Exhibit O to this Agreement sets forth the Relevant Servicing Criteria for such party. (c) No later than the end of each fiscal year for the Trust, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Operating Advisor and, if it has made (or is required to make) an Advance during such fiscal year, the Trustee shall notify the Certificate Administrator, the Depositor, each Other Exchange Act Reporting Party and each Other Depositor as to the name of each Servicing Function Participant utilized by it, and the Certificate Administrator shall notify the Depositor and each Other Depositor as to the name of each Servicing Function Participant utilized by it, during such fiscal year, and each such notice will specify what specific Servicing Criteria will be addressed in the report on assessment of compliance prepared by such Servicing Function Participant. When the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Trustee (if applicable), the Operating Advisor and any Servicing Function Participant submit their assessments pursuant to Section 10.09(a) of this Agreement, such parties will also at such time include the assessment (and related attestation pursuant to Section 10.10 of this Agreement) of each Servicing Function Participant engaged by it. The fiscal year for the Trust shall be January 1 through and including December 31 of each calendar year. (d) In the event the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Trustee (if it has made, or is required to make, an Advance during the applicable period) or the Operating Advisor is terminated or resigns pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, such party shall provide, and each such party shall cause (or, if the Servicing Function Participant is a Mortgage Loan Seller Sub-Servicer, shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause) any Servicing Function Participant of such party to provide (and the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Certificate Administrator shall, with respect to any Servicing Function Participant that resigns or is terminated under any applicable servicing agreement, cause such Servicing Function Participant (or, in the case of each Servicing Function Participant that is a Mortgage Loan Seller Sub-Servicer, shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such Servicing Function Participant) to provide) an annual assessment of compliance pursuant to this Section 10.09, coupled with an attestation as required in Section 10.10 of this Agreement with respect to the period of time that the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Trustee (if it has made, or is required to make, an Advance during such period of time) or the Operating Advisor was subject to this Agreement or the period of time that the applicable Servicing Function Participant was subject to such other servicing agreement. With respect to each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan serviced under the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement, the Certificate Administrator shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain, and upon receipt deliver to the Depositor, an annual report on assessment of compliance as described in this Section and an attestation as described in Section 10.10 from the related Outside Servicer, Outside Special Servicer, Outside Custodian, Outside Trustee and Outside Paying Agent or Outside Certificate Administrator and in form and substance similar to the annual report on assessment of compliance described in this Section 10.09 and the attestation described in Section 10.10.

  • Duration of processing and erasure or return of data Processing by the data importer shall only take place for the duration specified in Annex I.

  • Inspections and Tests 26.1 The Supplier shall at its own expense and at no cost to the Procuring Entity carry out all such tests and/or inspections of the Goods and Related Services as are specified in the SCC. 26.2 The inspections and tests may be conducted on the premises of the Supplier or its Subcontractor, at point of delivery, and/or at the Goods' final destination, or in another place in Kenya as specified in the SCC. Subject to GCC Sub-Clause 26.3, if conducted on the premises of the Supplier or its Subcontractor, all reasonable facilities and assistance, including access to drawings and production data, shall be furnished to the inspectors at no charge to the Procuring Entity. 26.3 The Procuring Entity or its designated representative shall be entitled to attend the tests and/or inspections referred to in GCC Sub-Clause 26.2, provided that the Procuring Entity bear all of its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with such attendance including, but not limited to, all travelling and board and lodging expenses. 26.4 Whenever the Supplier is ready to carry out any such test and inspection, it shall give a reasonable advance notice, including the place and time, to the Procuring Entity. The Supplier shall obtain from any relevant third party or manufacturer any necessary permission or consent to enable the Procuring Entity or its designated representative to attend the test and/or inspection. 26.5 The Procuring Entity may require the Supplier to carry out any test and/or inspection not required by the Contract but deemed necessary to verify that the characteristics and performance of the Goods comply with the technical specifications codes and standards under the Contract, provided that the Supplier's reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the carrying out of such test and/or inspection shall be added to the Contract Price. Further, if such test and/or inspection impedes the progress of manufacturing and/or the Supplier's performance of its other obligations under the Contract, due allowance will be made in respect of the Delivery Dates and Completion Dates and the other obligations so affected. 26.6 The Supplier shall provide the Procuring Entity with a report of the results of any such test and/or inspection. 26.7 The Procuring Entity may reject any Goods or any part thereof that fail to pass any test and/or inspection or do not conform to the specifications. The Supplier shall either rectify or replace such rejected Goods or parts thereof or make alterations necessary to meet the specifications at no cost to the Procuring Entity, and shall repeat the test and/or inspection, at no cost to the Procuring Entity, upon giving a notice pursuant to GCC Sub- Clause 26.4. 26.8 The Supplier agrees that neither the execution of a test and/or inspection of the Goods or any part thereof, nor the attendance by the Procuring Entity or its representative, nor the issue of any report pursuant to GCC Sub-Clause 26.6, shall release the Supplier from any warranties or other obligations under the Contract.

  • Minimum Site Requirements for TIPS Sales (when applicable to TIPS Sale). Cleanup: When performing work on site at a TIPS Member’s property, Vendor shall clean up and remove all debris and rubbish resulting from their work as required or directed by the TIPS Member or as agreed by the parties. Upon completion of work, the premises shall be left in good repair and an orderly, neat, clean and unobstructed condition. Preparation: Vendor shall not begin a project for which a TIPS Member has not prepared the site, unless Vendor does the preparation work at no cost, or until TIPS Member includes the cost of site preparation in the TIPS Sale Site preparation includes, but is not limited to: moving furniture, installing wiring for networks or power, and similar pre‐installation requirements. Registered Sex Offender Restrictions: For work to be performed at schools, Vendor agrees that no employee of Vendor or a subcontractor who has been adjudicated to be a registered sex offender will perform work at any time when students are, or reasonably expected to be, present unless otherwise agreed by the TIPS Member. Vendor agrees that a violation of this condition shall be considered a material breach and may result in the cancellation of the TIPS Sale at the TIPS Member’s discretion. Vendor must identify any additional costs associated with compliance of this term. If no costs are specified, compliance with this term will be provided at no additional charge. Safety Measures: Vendor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of employees on the worksite, and shall erect and properly maintain all necessary safeguards for protection of workers and the public. Vendor shall post warning signs against all hazards created by the operation and work in progress. Proper precautions shall be taken pursuant to state law and standard practices to protect workers, general public and existing structures from injury or damage. Smoking: Persons working under Agreement shall adhere to the TIPS Member’s or local smoking statutes, codes, ordinances, and policies.

  • Services and Information for Persons with Limited English Proficiency A. Grantee shall take reasonable steps to provide services and information both orally and in writing, in appropriate languages other than English, to ensure that persons with limited English proficiency are effectively informed and can have meaningful access to programs, benefits and activities. Meaningful access may entail providing language assistance services, including oral interpretation and written translation, if necessary. More information can be found at xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/. B. Grantee shall identify and document on the client records the primary language/dialect of a client who has limited English proficiency and the need for translation or interpretation services and shall not require a client to provide or pay for the services of a translator or interpreter. C. Grantee shall make every effort to avoid use of any persons under the age of 18 or any family member or friend of the client as an interpreter for essential communications with a client with limited English proficiency, unless the client has requested that person and using the person would not compromise the effectiveness of services or violate the client’s confidentiality and the client is advised that a free interpreter is available.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Geographic Area and Sector Specific Allowances, Conditions and Exceptions The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant. Where the Employer does work which falls under the following headings, the Employer agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • Right to Review Tax Returns Upon request, each party shall make available to the other party the portion of Pre-Separation Period Tax Returns that relates to the ALC Group that the first party is responsible for preparing under this Article III.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!