SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY. The methodology used in developing the amendment to the certified CY 2019 capitation rates for effective dates of July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 is outlined below. Appendix 1 contains a summary of July 2019 capitation rate changes.
SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY groups and tools The tasks related to communication and dissemination in the project involve all the members of the Consortium, so all the partners should work and contribute to dissemination tasks according to the agreements and the DOA. Nevertheless, FHA, as project coordinator, is the final element in charge of the dissemination, being invested in elaborating and contributing the dissemination plan, promoting the collaboration of all the partners and finally monitoring and compiling the dissemination and communication activities of the project. The message to be disseminated related to the project, activities and results is different depending on the target to be achieved To policy makers and regulators, the message is oriented to explain the potential markets of hydrogen together with the benefits and needs of the electrolysers connected to the grid to enable a higher penetration of RE in the energy mix of the power grid. The potential benefits of XX XXX working to balance the grid or providing grid services have to be communicated to RE stakeholders, DSOs and TSOs, including new business models. The results disclosed by the consortium regarding technology, framework and market, shall be shared in forums oriented to hydrogen stakeholders and technology providers, in order to pave the way to the deployment of hydrogen technologies. The participation in the communication events and activities promoted by the FCH 2 JU will be of key importance to reach these stakeholders On the other hand, a more general message related to the introduction of RE and hydrogen, minimising the impact of the energy production and improving the impact on economy and social environment, has to be disseminated to the general public. The additional goal at this point is to reduce the existing resistance to these new technologies and motivating early adopters. Furthermore, the information obtained through the continuous monitoring of the external projects will also serve as feedback to define specific stakeholders from the different groups.
SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY. The methodology used in developing the amendment to the certified CY 2017 capitation rates is outlined below.
SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY. The methodology used in developing the amendment to the certified CY 2021 capitation rates is outlined below.
SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY. The methodology used in developing the amendment to the certified CY 2021 capitation rates is outlined below. Appendix 1 contains a summary of CY 2021 MyCare Opt-Out capitation changes.
SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY. ODJFS contracted with Milliman to develop the CY 2008 ABD actuarially sound capitation rates. The actuarially sound capitation rates were developed from historical claims and enrollment data for the fee for service (FFS) population. The FFS population is considered a comparable population to the population to be enrolled with the health plans. The historical experience was converted to a per member per month (PMPM) basis and stratified by region and category of service. The historical experience was trended forward using projected trend rates to a center point of July 1, 2008 for the 2008 calendar year contract period. The historical experience was adjusted to reflect adjustments to the utilization and average cost per service that would be expected in a managed care environment. Appendix 1 contains a chart outlining the methodology that was used to develop the CY 2008 capitation rates for the ABD populations. Appendix 2 contains the actuarial certification regarding the actuarial soundness of the capitation rates. Appendix 3 contains the CY 2008 capitation rates by region, including the segmentation of the administrative cost allowance between guaranteed and at-risk components. DETAILS OF METHODOLOGY
SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY. ODJFS contracted with Milliman to develop the CY 2008 ABD actuarially sound capitation rates. The actuarially sound capitation rates were developed from historical claims and enrollment data for the fee for service (FFS) population. The FFS population is considered a comparable population to the population to be enrolled with the health plans. The historical experience was converted to a per member per month (PMPM) basis and stratified by region and category of service. The historical experience was trended forward using projected trend rates to a center point of July 1, 2008 for the 2008 calendar year contract period. The historical experience was adjusted to reflect adjustments to the utilization and average cost per service that would be expected in a managed care environment. Appendix 1 contains a chart outlining the methodology that was used to develop the CY 2008 capitation rates for the ABD populations. Appendix 2 contains the actuarial certification regarding the actuarial soundness of the capitation rates. Appendix 3 contains the CY 2008 capitation rates by region, including the segmentation of the administrative cost allowance between guaranteed and at-risk components. DETAILS OF METHODOLOGY