Summary of Reviewer Replies Sample Clauses

Summary of Reviewer Replies. ‌ The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see section 5.4 for details). ▪ Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, US Forest Service ▪ Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ▪ Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, NOAA Fisheries
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of Reviewer Replies. The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see Section 9.4 for details). • Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, North Cascades Conservation Council • Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, USDA-FS The following reviewers replied but had no comments. • XxXxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Washington Department of Natural Resources • Xxxxx Xxxx, Town of Concrete • Xxx Xxxxxxxx, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office
Summary of Reviewer Replies. ‌ The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see section 9.4 for details).  Xxxxx Xxxxx, Skagit County Parks and Recreation  Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife The following reviewers replied but had no comments.  Xxx Xxxxxxxx, WA Recreation and Conservation Office  Xxxxx Xxxx, Town of Concrete  Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, USDA-FS  Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, North Cascades Conservation Council  Xxxx Xxxxxx, Whatcom County Sheriff’s Office
Summary of Reviewer Replies. ‌ The following reviewers sent comments to PSE (see section 9.4 for details). • Xxx-Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Upper Skagit Indian Tribe • Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, USDA Forest Service (comments provided on 11/30 and 12/09) The following reviewers replied but had no comments. • Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, North Cascades Conservation Council • XxxXxxxx Xxxxx, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • XxXxx Xxxxxxxxx, Washington Department of Natural Resources
Summary of Reviewer Replies. The following reviewers sent comments to PSE about the BLRP (see Section 9.4 for details).  Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, North Cascades Conservation Council  XxxXxxxx Xxxxx, US Fish and Wildlife Service The following reviewers replied but had no comments.  XxXxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Washington Department of Natural Resources  Xxxxx Xxxx, Town of Concrete  Xxx Xxxxxxxx, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office  Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Sauk-Suiattle Tribal Community  Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, USDA-FS

Related to Summary of Reviewer Replies

  • Invoice Submittal DEO shall reimburse Subrecipient in accordance with Section 6, above. In accordance with the Funding Requirements of s. 215.971(1), F.S. and Section 21 of this Agreement, Subrecipient and its subcontractors may only expend funding under this Agreement for allowable costs resulting from obligations incurred during this Agreement. To be eligible for reimbursement, costs must be in compliance with laws, rules and regulations applicable to expenditures of State funds, including, but not limited to, the Reference Guide for State Expenditures (xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/Division/AA/Manuals/documents/ReferenceGuideforStateExpenditures.pdf).

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

  • REPORT SUBMISSION 1. Copies of reporting packages for audits conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F-Audit Requirements, and required by PART I of this form shall be submitted, when required by 2 CFR 200.512, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) as provided in 2 CFR 200.36 and 200.512

  • Review of Submittals A/E and ODR review is only for conformance with the design concept and the information provided in the Contract Documents. Responses to submittals will be in writing. The approval of a separate item does not indicate approval of an assembly in which the item functions. The approval of a submittal does not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for any deviation from the requirements of the Contract unless the Contractor informs the A/E and ODR of such deviation in a clear, conspicuous, and written manner on the submittal transmittal and at the time of submission, and obtains the A/E’s and Owner’s written specific approval of the particular deviation.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Invoice Submission The Contractor shall accept payment of invoices via EFT. Invoice submission information shall be contained in each individual Order. Payment of invoices will be made by the payment office designated in each individual Order.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • NOTIFICATIONS AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS Unless otherwise stated in writing after the Effective Date, all notifications and reports required under this IA shall be submitted to the following entities: OIG: Administrative and Civil Remedies Branch Office of Counsel to the Inspector General Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Xxxxx Building, Room 5527 000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 LFAC: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, DPM 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xx. X-000 Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Email: xx.xxxxx@xxxxx.xxx Unless otherwise specified, all notifications and reports required by this IA may be made by electronic mail, overnight mail, hand delivery, or other means, provided that there is proof that such notification was received. Upon request by OIG, LFAC may be required to provide OIG with an additional copy of each notification or report required by this IA in OIG’s requested format (electronic or paper).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.