Table S3. Regression results for resting state connectome similarity exploring the unique effects of abuse and neglect (N = 76 dyads). Unstandardized B (SE) Standardized β p F df p R2 5.02 4, 71 .001 .22 Abuse -.060 (.032) -.225 .046 Neglect -.022 (.032) -.063 .489 Parent Age -.001 (.001) -.099 .442 Age Difference -.005 (.002) -.330 .013
Table S3. Median difference in FeNO and FEV1/FVC and mean difference in FEV1 and FEF25-75 in schoolchildren with wheeze when reported by (A) children,
Table S3. 2. Significantly differentially expressed genes identified using edgeR analysis of Pre- ADT Bxs and Post-ADT RPs. pg. 58
Table S3. Internal consistency, intra and inter-rater agreement of relevant typical findings a. Typical findings Xxxxx’x kappa coefficient (range) Overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient Multifocal GGO 0.757-0.848 0.941 Rounded GGO 0.649-0.849 0.922 Crazy-paving 0.363-0.774 0.866 Perilobular pattern 0.309-0.768 0.839 Abbreviations: GGO, ground glass opacities. Please, refer to table 2 to assess prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of typical CT findings.
Table S3. Category Statistics of 3-Facet RSM (Integrated Data, All Scorers) Score N Average Measure Expected Measure Outfit Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx Threshold (SE) 0 3437 -2.20 -2.18 1.0 - 1 2054 -0.99 -0.91 0.9 -0.98 (.03) 2 2446 0.17 -0.02 1.7 -0.63 (.03) 3 2617 0.82 0.88 0.9 0.35 (.03) 4 3124 2.06 2.08 1.0 1.26 (.03) Note. The Average Measure is the average Xxxxx person ability measure of all examinees who received a particular score on the rating scale, while the Expected Measure is model-predicted average Xxxxx person ability measure of examinees who receive a particular score. Outfit indicates the degree to which unexpected observations are present for a score; values near 1.0 are ideal. Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx thresholds indicate the point in the examinee ability continuum at which two adjacent categories are equally probable.
Table S3. E. coli contamination in public drains by local sanitation coverage Within 50m of drain sample (n = 58) Within 100m of drain sample (n = 72) Main effect of modela βb SE(β) βb SE(β) Public toiletc 0.26 0.35 0.46 0.25 Any HH sanitation -8.74 x 10-2 6.80 x 10-2 -7.77 x 10-3 7.06 x 10-2 Contained HH sanitation -4.35 x 10-2 7.92 x 10-2 6.64 x 10-2 7.11 x 10-2 Minimally-shared HH sanitation ≤ 5 HHs/toilet -0.11 8.26 x 10-2 -4.08 x 10-2 7.82 x 10-2 ≤ 30 people/toilet -0.13 7.81 x 10-2 -2.27 x 10-2 7.97 x 10-2 aAll models are adjusted for neighborhood (Alajo as reference), population density around the location of the sample, and seas on of sample collection (rainy/dry). bEstimate is for a 10% increase in sanitation coverage within the specified radius. cPresence or absence of public toilet within 50 or 100m. Table S4: Adenovirus, NoV GI, and NoV GII contamination in public drains by local sanitation coveragea Within 50m of drain sample (n = 58) Within 100m of drain sample (n = 72) Main effect of model Adenovirus OR (95% CI)b GI norovirus OR (95% CI)b GII norovirus OR (95% CI)b Adenovirus OR (95% CI)b GI norovirus OR (95% CI)b GII norovirus OR (95% CI)b Public toiletc 0.42 (0.09, 2.02) 0.15 (0.00, 1.34)d 1.41 (0.28, 7.46) 0.56 (0.15, 2.12) 0.32 (0.04, 1.43) 0.79 (0.23, 2.65) Any HH sanitation 0.65 (0.44, 0.97)† 0.95 (0.65, 1.40) 0.91 (0.66, 1.25) 0.77 (0.53, 1.12) 1.06 (0.70, 1.61) 0.80 (0.56, 1.13) Contained HH sanitation 0.76 (0.50, 1.16) 1.19 (0.77, 1.84) 0.77 (0.52, 1.14) 0.99 (0.68, 1.44) 1.01 (0.69, 1.49) 0.83 (0.59, 1.19) Minimally-shared HH sanitation ≤ 5 HHs/toilet 0.82 (0.52, 1.28) 1.22 (0.76, 1.94) 0.98 (0.67, 1.44) 0.92 (0.62, 1.36) 1.24 (0.80, 1.95) 0.80 (0.55, 1.17) ≤ 30 people/toilet 0.67 (0.43, 1.07) 0.94 (0.62, 1.43) 1.01 (0.72, 1.43) 0.79 (0.53, 1.18) 0.69 (0.40, 1.19) 0.87 (0.59, 1.29) aAll models are adjusted for neighborhood (Alajo as reference), population density around the location of the sample, and season of sample collection (rainy/dry). bEstimate is for a 10% increase in sanitation coverage within the specified radius. cPresence or absence of public toilet within 50 or 100m. destimated by Firth approximation Table S5: Adenovirus, NoV GI, and NoV GII contamination in public drains by sanitation coverage clustera 50m vicinity of drain sample (n = 58) 100m vicinity of drain sample (n = 72) Adenovirus GI norovirus GII norovirus Adenovirus GI norovirus GII norovirus Main effect of model OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95%...
Table S3. Age-adjusted Incidence Rates and Incidence Rate Ratios of High Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma by Race/Ethnicity for 2004–2009 (Period 1) and 2010–2015 (Period 2) N IR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) P value Overall 2004-2009 7,251 1.44 (1.41,1.48) 1.00 2010-2015 NHW 6,795 1.16 (1.13, 1.19) 0.80 (0.78, 0.83) <0.0001 2004-2009 5,234 1.48 (1.44, 1.52) 1.00 2010-2015 NHB 4,567 1.17 (1.13, 1.20) 0.79 (0.76, 0.82) <0.0001 2004-2009 806 1.80 (1.68, 1.94) 1.00 2010-2015 NHO 791 1.42 (1.32, 1.53) 0.79 (0.71, 0.87) <0.0001 2004-2009 565 1.18 (1.08, 1.28) 1.00 2010-2015 Hispanic 675 1.09 (1.01, 1.18) 0.93 (0.83, 1.04) 0.2098 2004-2009 646 1.10 (1.01, 1.19) 1.00 2010-2015 762 0.97 (0.90, 1.04) 0.88 (0.79, 0.98) 0.0254 Rates are per 100,000 and age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. Standard Population. Abbreviations: IR, incidence rate; IRR, incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval; NHW, non-Hispanic White; NHB, non-Hispanic Black; NHO, non-Hispanic Other.
