The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee Article 6 (continued) members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post-Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five working days, to fulfill committee obligations. A minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation package prior to the report being finalized and signed. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate. 1) The faculty chair will serve on area evaluations and facilitate the Pre-Observation Meeting. In the event that a faculty chair cannot serve, an area does not have a chair, or the faculty chair is the evaluee, the Educational Administrator will meet with the faculty in the area to select a suitable substitute. 2) Faculty Evaluators will participate in all components of the evaluation as peer experts: 3) The Educational Administrator:
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee Article 6 (continued) members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post-Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five working days, to fulfill committee obligations. A minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation package prior to the report being finalized and signed. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate.
1) The faculty chair will serve on area evaluations and facilitate the Pre-Observation Meeting. In the event that a faculty chair cannot serve, an area does not have a chair, or the faculty chair is the evaluee, the Educational Administrator will meet with the faculty in the area to select a suitable substitute.
2) Faculty Evaluators will participate in all components of the evaluation as peer experts:: • Attend all committee meetings. • Review the Evaluation Packet and other materials. • Make arrangements for an observation date. • Complete the observation and observation form appropriate to assignment. • Complete Form B/FT as appropriate. • Give the evaluee timely feedback upon completion of the observation (prior to the post-observation meeting). • Sign the final report confirming the majority opinion.
3) The Educational Administrator:: • Provides direction to evaluee on expectations and suitability of initial paperwork. • Provides direction to evaluee on expectations and initial process. • Determines the timeline following contract specifications. • Coordinates the paperwork inherent in the process. • Completes an observation and observation form appropriate to the assignment. • Gives the evaluee timely feedback upon completion of the observation (prior to the Post-Observation Meeting). • Completes administrative assessment Form Q/FT. • Coordinates the evaluation team as it jointly completes the Evaluation Team Summary (attached to form A/FT), based upon the majority opinion of the group. • Types summary report. • After consultation with the evaluation committee, makes a recommendation on continued employment of the faculty member to the President or designee.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee Article 6 (continued) members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post-Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five working days, to fulfill committee obligations. Any committee member(s) A may submit a minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation Evaluation package Package prior to the report being finalized and signed. A minority statement is a separate written statement presented by member(s) of a committee who disagree with the majority. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate.
1) The faculty chair will serve on area evaluations and facilitate the Pre-Observation Meetingand the Summary Evaluation Meetings. In the event that a faculty chair cannot serve, an area does not have a chair, or the faculty chair is the evaluee, the Educational Administrator will meet with the faculty in the area to select a suitable substitute.
2) Faculty Evaluators will participate in all components of the evaluation as peer experts:
3) The Educational Administrator:: • Attend all committee meetings. • Review the Evaluation Packet and other materials.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement