The Tasking Process Sample Clauses

The Tasking Process. The work programme for the Regional Transformation Team will be influenced by the outputs from national tasking and threat group processes, alongside emerging recommendations from national reviews and HMICFRS inspections, and products emerging from the 4P Team, JSTAC and the Insight Teams, following the developing evidence base and intelligence requirements. This should ensure that effort of the Regional transformation teams is targeted against high harm and high impact areas, or areas flagged as causing disproportionate challenges to Forces either nationally or within their region. Modern Slavery is an area of significant interest for ministers, policy officials and law enforcement decision-makers. It is likely that there will be a significant appetite for tasking and reporting that could threaten to overwhelm the capacity of the Modern Slavery Regional Transformation Team. Additionally, one of the lessons learnt from the previous implementation of Regional Transformation Teams involves the breadth of tasking from ROCUs to coordinators outside of the programme’s main tasking. The Parties agree that additional tasking by ROCUs may detract from driving Programme priorities, as such all work must be undertaken under the guidance of the Modern Slavery Police Transformation Unit National Delivery Coordinator/Regional Analyst Manager. Each ROCU Host Force shall procure that the Regional Transformation Teams will operate on both the 'push' and 'pull' models of coordination and support, taking the initiative to service the individual demand and need from the forces in their region and provide the support they judge to be important and timely (the 'push' model), whilst also providing coordination in response to tasking from the Police Transformation Programme (the 'pull' model). Each ROCU Host Force shall procure that the Regional Transformation Teams act as conduits for forces and ROCUs to task into the Police Transformation Programme, especially around particularly ‘difficult’ problems their region are grappling with. These models are outlined in process charts, below:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Tasking Process. The work programme for the Police and Crime Commissioners workstream will be influenced by the outputs from the NATMSN meetings and the MS Programme Board. This should ensure that effort of the coordinator is targeted against high harm and high impact areas, or areas flagged as causing disproportionate challenges to PCCs either nationally or within their region. West Yorkshire PCC shall procure that the NATMSN coordinator shall be tasked through the West Yorkshire OPCC project lead, who will balance requests from PCCs in England & Wales with requests from national agencies and the MSPTU. All requests for support from the NATMSN coordinator can be submitted through the central network email address.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
The Tasking Process. The work programme for the Regional Coordination Team will be influenced by the outputs from the What Works Team, HMIC, the JSTAC and the National Insight Teams, following the developing evidence base and intelligence requirements. This should ensure that effort of the Regional Co-ordinators is targeted against high harm and high impact areas, or areas flagged as causing disproportionate challenges to Forces either nationally or within their region. Modern Slavery is an area of significant interest for ministers, policy officials and law enforcement decision-makers. It is likely that there will be a significant appetite for tasking and reporting that could threaten to overwhelm the capacity of the Modern Slavery Regional Co-ordination Team. Additionally, one of the lessons learnt from the previous implementation of CSE Regional Coordinators involves the breadth of tasking from ROCUs to coordinators outside of the programmes’ main tasking. The Parties agree that additional tasking by ROCUs may detract from driving Police Transformation Programme priorities, as such all work must be undertaken under the guidance of the Modern Slavery Police Transformation Unit DCI, Head of Operations and Development. Each ROCU Host Force shall procure that the Regional Co-ordinators will operate on both the 'push' and 'pull' models of coordination and support, taking the initiative to service the individual demand and need from the forces in their region and provide the support they judge to be important and timely (the 'push' model), whilst also providing coordination in response to tasking from the Police Transformation Programme (the 'pull' model). Each ROCU Host Force shall procure that the Regional Co-ordinators act as conduits for forces and ROCUs to task into the Police Transformation Programme, especially around particularly ‘difficult’ problems their region are grappling with. The introduction of a Task Commissioning pro-forma will enable the setting of specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Timely (SMART) tasking activity and maximising the consistency of tasking nationally. This audit trail will also support the evaluation of the roles activity. These models are outlined in process charts, below:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
The Tasking Process. Modern Slavery is an area of significant interest for ministers, policy officials and law enforcement decision-makers. It is likely that there will be a significant appetite for reporting that could threaten to significantly overwhelm the National Insight Team's staffing levels. Consequently, the National Insight Teams activity and assessment must be formally commissioned through the Transformation Programme and the workload managed by the Head of Insight & Analysis. The Lead Force shall procure that the National Insight Team will operate on both a ‘pull’ and ‘push’ model of knowledge production. Specialists within the team will recommend the production of reporting based upon material they are exposed to in the normal course of their duties (the ‘push’ model). Customers and stakeholders will request reporting to address key operational and policy concerns (the ‘pull’ model). These models are outlined in process charts below: The Lead Force shall procure that the production of a commissioning pro-forma which will be conducted by commissioning bodies in close liaison with the Head of Insight & Analysis, enabling the setting of meaningful and answerable terms of reference and maximising the chance that commissions will be cleared. This audit trail will also support the evaluation of the teams’ activity. The Lead Force shall procure that products will be issued through the Transformation Programme official channels with appropriate handling conditions. In principle, learning will be shared as widely as is feasible, in consultation with the Forces/Agencies supplying material. This may require the production of sanitised products for wider dissemination via Polka.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3

Related to The Tasking Process

  • Benchmarking Process 2.2.1 The Supplier shall produce and send to the Authority for Approval, a draft plan for the Benchmark Review.

  • Bidding Process 3.1. Bidding shall generally commence based on the sequence of the lot being shown on the PAH Website. However the Auctioneer has the right to vary the sequence without having to give prior notice to the intended bidders.

  • Ordering Process 6.4.1 CLEC, or CLEC's agent, shall act as the single point of contact for its End User Customers' service needs, including without limitation, sales, service design, order taking, Provisioning, change orders, training, maintenance, trouble reports, repair, post-sale servicing, Billing, collection and inquiry. CLEC's End User Customers contacting Qwest in error will be instructed to contact CLEC; and Qwest's End User Customers contacting CLEC in error will be instructed to contact Qwest. In responding to calls, neither Party shall make disparaging remarks about each other. To the extent the correct provider can be determined, misdirected calls received by either Party will be referred to the proper provider of local Exchange Service; however, nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit Qwest or CLEC from discussing its products and services with CLEC's or Qwest's End User Customers who call the other Party seeking such information.

  • Hiring Process i. School District and Teach For America will collaborate in good faith to facilitate the efficient hiring of individual Teachers, in accordance with the School District’s established District hiring practices.

  • CONTRACTOR STAFF WITHIN AUTHORIZED USER AGREEMENT The provisions of this section shall apply unless otherwise agreed in the Authorized User Agreement. All employees of the Contractor, or of its Subcontractors, who shall perform under an Authorized User Agreement, shall possess the necessary qualifications, training, licenses, and permits as may be required within the jurisdiction where the Services specified are to be provided or performed, and shall be legally entitled to work in such jurisdiction. All Business Entities that perform Services under the Contract on behalf of Contractor shall, in performing the Services, comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws concerning employment in the United States. Staffing Changes within Authorized User Agreement

  • CONTRACTOR NAME CHANGE An amendment is required to change the Contractor's name as listed on this Agreement. Upon receipt of legal documentation of the name change the State will process the amendment. Payment of invoices presented with a new name cannot be paid prior to approval of said amendment.

  • Technical Safeguards 1. USAC and the Department will process the data matched and any data created by the match under the immediate supervision and control of authorized personnel to protect the confidentiality of the data, so unauthorized persons cannot retrieve any data by computer, remote terminal, or other means.

  • Authorized User’s Statement of Work A competitive Mini-Bid is required for every transaction under this Centralized Contract. An Authorized User must prepare a detailed Statement of Work using Appendix F, Attachment 1, Mini-Bid Template. The Authorized User must distribute the Mini-Bid to all qualified Vendors per Lot(s) (unless a Vendor has removed itself from consideration via the Appendix F, Attachment 5, Mini-Bid Participation Interest Template). Contact information, organized by Lot, will be available on the OGS website for this Contract. An Authorized User shall conduct its Mini-Bid in accordance with the requirements set forth in Appendix F, Attachment 2, How to Use this Contract. The following terms and conditions shall apply to each Mini-Bid issued by an Authorized User:  An Authorized User may require the execution of unique forms, such as Confidentiality Non- Disclosure agreements; and  An Authorized User is required to make tentative award and non-award notifications to each Contractor who submitted a response to the Mini-Bid. Additionally, the minimum time, excluding the date of release, between issuance of the Mini-Bid by the Authorized User to the Mini-Bid Opening is as follows:  Xxx 0 Xxxx-Xxxx: Xxxx (0) Xxxxxxxx Xxxx  Xxx 0 Mini-Bids: Ten (10) Business Days

  • Out of Scope Services Axon is only responsible to perform the professional services described in the Quote and this Appendix. Any additional professional services are out of scope. The Parties must document scope changes in a written and signed change order. Changes may require an equitable adjustment in the charges or schedule.

  • Working Procedure Assist in the definition and analysis of vehicle system requirements. Prepare technical specification sheets. Evaluate vendor proposals to ensure the specifications are met. Assist in the generation and checking of test reports. May conduct and witness factory acceptance tests, dynamic performance tests and may provide support for commissioning of vehicles at customers' premises. Perform other related duties as required.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!