Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmes. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion ...
Timelines and reports. 2.2.1 Planned date for submission of project proposal/protocol:
2.2.2 Planned deadline for ethics application (if applicable):
2.2.3 Progress reports should be written every by the student.
2.2.4 An annual progress report must be submitted by the supervisor for all students to HREC and for all doctoral students an annual progress report should also be submitted to the Doctoral Office (General Policies and Rules: Calendar Part 1).
2.2.5 Expected date of submission of final thesis/dissertation/research assignment:
2.2.6 Supervisor(s) should receive the final version of the student’s thesis/dissertation/research assignment date. days/weeks before submission
2.2.7 Supervisors are required to suggest possible examiners for the evaluation of a student’s thesis/dissertation/research assignment to the Postgraduate Programme Committee. This should be done with sufficient time for the Faculty Board to approve the examiners before the thesis/dissertation/research assignment is sent for examination.
2.2.8 Supervisors are required to indicate that the thesis/dissertation/research assignment is ready for submission for examination to the relevant administrative office (Doctoral Office/ Faculty Administrator/Officer).
2.2.9 Students should not know who their examiners are and may not communicate directly with the examiners (prior to the oral).
Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral candidate and primary supervisor will develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period. The doctoral candidate must document the course of the project in regular reports to the thesis committee (bi-annually); as described in section 2.a., each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xx/en/research_funding/principles_dfg_funding/good_scientific_practice/ xxxxx://xxx.xx/fileadmin/user_upload/gremien/Regulations-governing-the-Principles-for-safeguarding-good-academic-practice.pdf Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice including the FAIR principles: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral candidates must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through guidance of the supervisor and the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral candidates in this RTG. An introductory online course is freely available at: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/courses/good-research-practices-during-the-doctorate Supervisors will emphasise the importance of good data documentation for replicability of studies. They will encourage and support the sharing of raw data and analysis scripts in reliable repositories with high data persistence standards. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in...
Timelines and reports. 2.2.1 Planned date for submission of project proposal/protocol:
2.2.3 Planned deadline for ethics application (if applicable):
2.2.5 Progress reports should be written every by the student.
2.2.6 An annual progress report must be submitted by the supervisor for all students to HREC (General Policies and Rules: Calendar Part 1).
2.2.7 Expected date of submission of final thesis/dissertation/research assignment:
2.2.8 Supervisor(s) should receive the final version of the student’s thesis _ days/weeks before submission date.
2.2.9 Supervisors and students should take note of the timelines for submitting a research master’s thesis in the FMHS, as follows:
2.2.9.1 All students should send a completed and signed intention-to-submit form to xxx-xxxxxx@xxx.xx.xx 6 months before finally submitting a thesis for examination;
2.2.9.2 Supervisors are required suggest examiners to be nominated to the CPR in a report of the relevant Postgraduate Programme Committee 6 months prior to submission, to allow sufficient time for the Faculty Board to approve the examiners before the thesis is sent for examination;
2.2.9.3 Submissions are welcome from February to July, and no later than 30 August, with a view to possible December graduation;
2.2.9.4 Submissions are welcome in September and October, and no later than 30 November, with a view to possible March graduation;
2.2.9.5 Timelines are dependent on punctual and positive submissions from all parties.
2.2.10 Supervisors are required to indicate that the master’s thesis is ready for submission for examination by supplying a completed and signed Thesis Release Form to accompany the submission to the Tygerberg Doctoral Office (xxx-xxxxxx@xxx.xx.xx).
2.2.11 Students should not know who their examiners are and may not communicate directly with the examiners (prior to the oral).
Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate the doctoral student has to create a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure that a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period is allowed (usually three to four years). The PhD student is obliged to document the course of the project in regular reports to the Thesis Committee (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline.
