Timelines and reports Sample Clauses
The "Timelines and reports" clause establishes the requirements for scheduling and progress documentation within an agreement. It typically sets out deadlines for deliverables, milestones, or project phases, and outlines the frequency and format of status reports that must be provided by one or both parties. By clearly defining when tasks must be completed and how progress is communicated, this clause ensures accountability and transparency, helping to prevent misunderstandings and delays throughout the course of the project or contract.
Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sie hier, um Text einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmes. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion ...
Timelines and reports. 2.2.1 Planned date for submission of project proposal/protocol:
2.2.2 Planned deadline for ethics application (if applicable):
2.2.3 Progress reports should be written every by the student.
2.2.4 An annual progress report must be submitted by the supervisor for all students to HREC and for all doctoral students an annual progress report should also be submitted to the Doctoral Office (General Policies and Rules: Calendar Part 1).
2.2.5 Expected date of submission of final thesis/dissertation/research assignment:
2.2.6 Supervisor(s) should receive the final version of the student’s thesis/dissertation/research assignment date. days/weeks before submission
2.2.7 Supervisors are required to suggest possible examiners for the evaluation of a student’s thesis/dissertation/research assignment to the Postgraduate Programme Committee. This should be done with sufficient time for the Faculty Board to approve the examiners before the thesis/dissertation/research assignment is sent for examination.
2.2.8 Supervisors are required to indicate that the thesis/dissertation/research assignment is ready for submission for examination to the relevant administrative office (Doctoral Office/ Faculty Administrator/Officer).
2.2.9 Students should not know who their examiners are and may not communicate directly with the examiners (prior to the oral).
Timelines and reports. In the beginning of his/her scientific work, the PhD student should compile an exposé (thesis concept paper) with a timeline that allows a successful completion of the PhD thesis within the period agreed (usually about three years). The PhD student should wherever applicable document his/her progress in written reports. An updated time line should be part of each report. [Name of the Doctorade Candidate] will participate in the RTG program and the PhD Program [“Neurosensory Science and Systems”]. [Name of the Doctorade Candidate] will take part in the PhD program courses and events to an adequate extent. At German universities and research institutions, freedom of science in research, teaching and studies is guaranteed. This freedom is associated with responsibility for fostering the fundamental values and norms of good scientific practice, for realizing them in the researcher’s daily activity and for defending them. The successful application of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for the high standard of achievement in the scientific system. The recommendations on fundamentals for good scientific work are as follows: Awareness of principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truth maintain absolute priority in scientific work. The PhD student should be aware of all principles of good scientific practice. The information can be obtained through the participation in an adequate course offered by the Graduate School of the Faculty V and/or the daily activities of the research group. The principles of good scientific practice are to be looked up by the PhD student (e.g. at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/download/gute_wiss._praxis_web.pdf). PhD Students have to learn about good scientific practice in a corresponding Workshop. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Each PhD student is personally responsible for his/her own work. A working group or unit usually has one group leader. The group leader carries the responsibility for the work and the conditions for facilitating an effective cooperation and coordination of the members. All members of a working group must be able to rely on each other since mutual trust is the basis for all conversations, discussions and even confrontations. Cooperation in scientific working groups must allow the findings to be communicated, critically discussed and integrated into a common level of knowledge and experience. Scientific misconduct: Misconduct, including the p...
Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the Thesis Committee _________________________ (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Oldenburg and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/goodscientificpractice/ ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_0198.pdf Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this in...
Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate the doctoral student has to create a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure that a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period is allowed (usually three to four years). The PhD student is obliged to document the course of the project in regular reports to the Thesis Committee (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline.
Timelines and reports. 2.2.1 Planned date for submission of project proposal/protocol:
2.2.3 Planned deadline for ethics application (if applicable):
2.2.5 Progress reports should be written every by the student.
2.2.6 An annual progress report must be submitted by the supervisor for all students to HREC (General Policies and Rules: Calendar Part 1).
2.2.7 Expected date of submission of final thesis/dissertation/research assignment:
2.2.8 Supervisor(s) should receive the final version of the student’s thesis _ days/weeks before submission date.
2.2.9 Supervisors and students should take note of the timelines for submitting a research master’s thesis in the FMHS, as follows:
2.2.9.1 All students should send a completed and signed intention-to-submit form to ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇ 6 months before finally submitting a thesis for examination;
2.2.9.2 Supervisors are required suggest examiners to be nominated to the CPR in a report of the relevant Postgraduate Programme Committee 6 months prior to submission, to allow sufficient time for the Faculty Board to approve the examiners before the thesis is sent for examination;
2.2.9.3 Submissions are welcome from February to July, and no later than 30 August, with a view to possible December graduation;
2.2.9.4 Submissions are welcome in September and October, and no later than 30 November, with a view to possible March graduation;
2.2.9.5 Timelines are dependent on punctual and positive submissions from all parties.
2.2.10 Supervisors are required to indicate that the master’s thesis is ready for submission for examination by supplying a completed and signed Thesis Release Form to accompany the submission to the Tygerberg Doctoral Office (▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇).
2.2.11 Students should not know who their examiners are and may not communicate directly with the examiners (prior to the oral).